The New York Times Editorial Board on Saturday endorsed Hillary Clinton in the race for the Democratic nomination in the U.S. presidential election, calling her "one of the most broadly and deeply qualified presidential candidates in modern history."
- The Jewish guide to the 2016 presidential candidates ahead of the Iowa caucuses
- Everything you wanted to know about the 2016 Iowa caucuses
- State Department admits Clinton's emails contained top secrets
Clinton, who faces a strong challenge from Senator Bernie Sanders, received the endorsement from one of the nation's largest newspapers two days before voters in Iowa hold the first nominating contest for the Nov. 8 election.
The editorial argued that Bernie Sanders "does not have the breadth of experience or policy ideas that Mrs. Clinton offers. His boldest proposals — to break up the banks and to start all over on health care reform with a Medicare-for-all system — have earned him support among alienated middle-class voters and young people. But his plans for achieving them aren’t realistic, while Mrs. Clinton has very good, and achievable, proposals in both areas."
The editorial said that the third Democratic candidate, Martin O’Malley, "is a personable and reasonable liberal who seems more suited for the jobs he has already had — governor of Maryland and mayor of Baltimore — than for president."