U.S. Officials Dispute Trump's Claim That Beirut Was Attacked

From video and other evidence, experts suggest that fireworks and ammonium nitrate were the fuel that ignited the explosion that rocked the Lebanese capital

The Associated Press
The Associated Press
Send in e-mailSend in e-mail
U.S. President Donald Trump arrives to hold a coronavirus briefing in the Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House in Washington,August 4, 2020.
U.S. President Donald Trump arrives to hold a coronavirus briefing in the Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House in Washington,August 4, 2020. Credit: Jonathan Ernst/Reuters
The Associated Press
The Associated Press

U.S. officials said Wednesday there is no indication the massive explosion in Lebanon that killed at least 100 people was an attack, contradicting President Donald Trump who said American generals told him it was likely caused by a bomb.

The officials, speaking only on condition of anonymity to discuss internal assessments, said that while it’ was not out of the realm of possibility that the blast was deliberately caused, the belief so far is that it was most likely an accident.

From the outset, U.S. officials have said that they did not know the cause of the initial fire and explosions that set off the larger blast. But they say they do believe the reports out of Lebanon claiming a large stockpile of ammonium nitrate left over from a seizure is what exploded.

On Tuesday, Trump offered condolences to the victims and said the United States stood ready to assist Lebanon. “It looks like a terrible attack,” he said.

Trump was asked why he called it an attack and not an accident, especially since Lebanese officials said they had not determined the cause of the explosion. He told reporters at the White House: “It would seem like it based on the explosion. I met with some of our great generals and they just seem to feel that it was. This was not a — some kind of a manufacturing explosion type of a event. ... They seem to think it was an attack. It was a bomb of some kind, yes.”

He repeated the claims on Wednesday, intimating that nobody could say for sure whether the devastating explosion could have been caused by an attack.

From video and other evidence, experts suggest that fireworks and ammonium nitrate were the fuel that ignited the explosion that rocked the Lebanese capital. The scale of the damage — from the area of the explosion at the port of Beirut to the windows blown out miles away — resembled other blasts involving the chemical compound commonly used as an agricultural fertilizer.

The compound typically does not detonate on its own and requires another ignition source. That likely came from a fire that engulfed what initially appeared to be fireworks stored at the port. The Lebanese government said it was putting an unspecified number of Beirut port officials under house arrest pending an investigation into how 2,750 tons of ammonium nitrate came to be stored at the port for years.

U.S. officials said that there were no indications that any of the Americans stationed in Beirut were killed or injured.

Comments