Left-wing Jewish Alliance Calls on Biden to Reject Antisemitism Definition That Includes anti-Zionism

Progressive Israel Network says International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance enabled Trump administration’s politicization of fight against antisemitism

Ben Samuels
Ben Samuels
Washington
Send in e-mailSend in e-mail
Joe Biden speaks as he announces members of economics and jobs team at his transition headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, January 8, 2021.
Joe Biden speaks as he announces members of economics and jobs team at his transition headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, January 8, 2021. Credit: REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
Ben Samuels
Ben Samuels
Washington

WASHINGTON – A U.S.-based coalition of 10 liberal Zionist organizations is urging the incoming Biden administration not to adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s working definition of antisemitism, citing a potential for misuse.

In a statement issued Tuesday, the Progressive Israel Network – comprising Ameinu, Americans for Peace Now, Habonim Dror North America, Hashomer Hatzair World Movement, Jewish Labor Committee, J Street, New Israel Fund, Partners for Progressive Israel, Reconstructing Judaism and T’ruah – argues that the effort to enshrine the IHRA definition in U.S. law and policy threatens to conflate legitimate criticism of Israel and advocacy for Palestinian rights with antisemitism.

After the Capitol Hill riots, will the blood on Trump's hands stain Israel? LISTEN

“The Biden administration and Congress should reject facile, oversimplified doctrines that can easily be abused,” the statement says. “They should refrain from legislating bans on constitutionally-protected speech and legitimate activism, which often wrongfully target those who harbor no hatred towards Jews, and which make it more difficult to identify and confront genuine instances of antisemitism.”

The working definition, adopted by the IHRA plenary in 2016, states: “Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”

In its statement, the Progressive Israel Network argues that adopting this definition, with its accompanying “contemporary examples” at the state, federal and university level and in corporate governance “has the potential to undermine core freedoms, and in some cases already has.”

According to the coalition, the contemporary examples attached to the working definition enabled the State Department or Secretary Michael Pompeo to declare – in what it calls “a harmful overreach” – that anti-Zionism as well as the global boycott, divestment and sanctions movement against Israel are antisemitism.

The statement calls out two of what the IHRA calls contemporary examples of antisemitism: “The examples regard as antisemitic the claim that ‘the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor’ and the application of ‘double standards’ to Israel ‘by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.’”

The contemporary examples cited in the definition also include Holocaust denial, theories about global Jewish conspiracies and holding Jews collectively responsible for Israeli actions.

“We are advocates for a future of equality, dignity and safety for all Israelis and all Palestinians. As such, we insist that activists, academics and all citizens must have the right to express a wide range of political opinions without fear of being suppressed or smeared by the government. This includes critiques of the legitimacy of Israel’s founding or the nature of its laws and system of government.”

In December Americans for Peace Now, a member of the Progressive Israel Network, refused a request by the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations to adopt the working definition, saying the umbrella organization of 51 groups would be better served “using a scalpel rather than a bulldozer.”

The organization Democratic Majority for Israel, however, urged Biden to adopt the definition. CEO Mark Mellman called the definition "a critical tool that serves as a guide for understanding and fighting antisemitism," adding that critics are "simply wrong on the facts."

Click the alert icon to follow topics:

Comments

SUBSCRIBERS JOIN THE CONVERSATION FASTER

Automatic approval of subscriber comments.

Subscribe today and save 40%

Already signed up? LOG IN

ICYMI

Palestinians search through the rubble of a building in which Khaled Mansour, a top Islamic Jihad militant was killed following an Israeli airstrike in Rafah, southern Gaza strip, on Sunday.

Gazans Are Tired of Pointless Wars and Destruction, and Hamas Listens to Them

Trump and Netanyahu at the White House in Washington, in 2020.

Three Years Later, Israelis Find Out What Trump Really Thought of Netanyahu

German soldier.

The Rival Jewish Spies Who Almost Changed the Course of WWII

Rio. Not all Jewish men wear black hats.

What Does a Jew Look Like? The Brits Don't Seem to Know

Galon. “I’m coming to accomplish a specific mission: to increase Meretz’s strength and ensure that the party will not tread water around the electoral threshold. If Meretz will be large enough, it will be the basis for a Jewish-Arab partnership.” Daniel Tchetchik

'I Have No Illusions About Ending the Occupation, but the Government Needs the Left'

Soldiers using warfare devices made by the Israeli defense electronics company Elbit Systems.

Russia-Ukraine War Catapults Israeli Arms Industry to Global Stage