Opinion |

Why Vaccinating Children for Coronavirus Is a Bad Idea

אפרת שור
Efrat Schurr
Send in e-mailSend in e-mail
An NHS pharmacy technician simulates the preparation a coronavirus vaccine, during a staff training session ahead of the vaccine's rollout next week, at the Royal Free Hospital in London on December 4, 2020.
An NHS pharmacy technician simulates the preparation a coronavirus vaccine, during a staff training session ahead of the vaccine's rollout next week, at the Royal Free Hospital in London, 2020.Credit: YUI MOK - AFP
אפרת שור
Efrat Schurr

I’m an Israeli pediatrician who treats thousands of children a year. Every mother and every father who knows me knows my opinion of the routine vaccinations administered to children. The parents who refuse and reject them get a learned, well-reasoned, motivational talk from me every time we meet – even if they came in to ask me to care of an ingrown toenail on one of their kid's feet. Ask them.

I’m obsessive. I argue and cite statistics, and if necessary, I scare them with horror stories of youngsters who have contracted measles and whooping cough and meningitis, from my days working in intensive care in Shaare Zedek Medical Center in Jerusalem.

And in the end there’s always the punch line: A vaccination is a life-saving medicine. It is the medicine that has been researched more than any other medicine in the world, Otherwise I wouldn’t have made my way to the baby clinic about 30 times to vaccinate my four daughters.

Before a vaccine is administered in a routine fashion, it is tested in clinical trials, in a process that includes many regulatory stages that are designed to ensure its safety and effectiveness for years to come. And even then, there are sometimes mishaps. In 1977, for example, a triple vaccination (against diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus) from a defective batch left several children blind, deaf and disabled forever.

True, I reply to the slanderers: Vaccinations, like any medicine, can have side effects – pains at the site of injection, or fever. The more severe side effects are very rare.

If I know that the benefit of a vaccine is greater than the possible harm it can do – I will recommend it. And if I don’t know – I won’t recommend it, nor will I be vaccinated, and nor will I vaccinate my four daughters.

A demonstrator holding an anti-COVID-19 vaccine placard takes part in a protest march at the Westfield shopping centre in Stratford, east London on December 5, 2020.Credit: JUSTIN TALLIS - AFP

The most important rule in medicine is “First do no harm.” That means that I, as a doctor, am obligated to weigh the benefit versus the possible harm of every medical treatment, for every boy and girl, in order to make a well-considered decision before I recommend or don’t recommend a vaccination for the coronavirus. We must check:

How many children have died from COVID-19 in Israel?

How many children have been hospitalized because of COVID-19 in Israel?

How many children have had to go on ventilators because of COVID-19?

How many children remained disabled because of COVID-19?

How many? None. No children at all.

A British technician practicing preparation of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, Dec. 4, 2020. U.S. and Israeli health authorities are deviating from accepted regulatory rules. Credit: Yui Mok/Pool Photo via AP

On the other hand: What is the possible harm from such a vaccination?

I don’t yet know.

On how many children has the vaccine been tested?

I haven’t found any statistics.

For how long did they keep track of children who received the vaccination?

I don’t know.

But I do know that in order to save zero children from the harm inflicted by the pandemic, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and the Israeli Health Ministry in its wake, are willing to deviate from accepted regulatory rules, and to approve an impressive abbreviation of the testing time and administer a fast-tracked vaccine to everyone.

I hear that in the coming months the vaccines will be arriving and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is already thinking of how to force all of us to be vaccinated and considering which sanctions to impose if we don't agree.

My logic says that in order to save zero children a year I’m not willing to recommend to any parent in the world to prick their child and introduce a substance that has not really been tested on kids the way it should be and as long as necessary.

Because let’s assume that in a few weeks or months from now we suddenly see damage in youngsters who received the vaccine. What will we say then? “Well, at least we saved zero children”?

Dr. Efrat Schurr is a pediatrician, the mother of four daughters.

Click the alert icon to follow topics:



Automatic approval of subscriber comments.
From $1 for the first month

Already signed up? LOG IN


Charles Lindbergh addressing an America First Committee rally on October 3, 1941.

Ken Burns’ Brilliant ‘The U.S. and the Holocaust’ Has Only One Problem

The projected rise in sea level on a beach in Haifa over the next 30 years.

Facing Rapid Rise in Sea Levels, Israel Could Lose Large Parts of Its Coastline by 2050

Tal Dilian.

As Israel Reins in Its Cyberarms Industry, an Ex-intel Officer Is Building a New Empire

Queen Elizabeth II, King Charles III and a British synagogue.

How the Queen’s Death Changes British Jewry’s Most Distinctive Prayer

Newly appointed Israeli ambassador to Chile, Gil Artzyeli, poses for a group picture alongside Rabbi Yonatan Szewkis, Chilean deputy Helia Molina and Gerardo Gorodischer, during a religious ceremony in a synagogue in Vina del Mar, Chile last week.

Chile Community Leaders 'Horrified' by Treatment of Israeli Envoy

Queen Elizabeth attends a ceremony at Windsor Castle, in June 2021.

Over 120 Countries, but Never Israel: Queen Elizabeth II's Unofficial Boycott