After anti-Boycott Law Gets Four Fired in Texas, ACLU Files Legal Challenge

The ACLU claims the law, which made recent headlines after a speech therapist was fired for refusing to sign a pledge not to boycott Israel, violates the First Amendment right to free speech

Amir Tibon
Amir Tibon
Washington
Send in e-mailSend in e-mail
FILE Photo: Faiz Shakir, national political director with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU),  in Washington, D.C., U.S., November 7, 2017.
Faiz Shakir, national political director with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), in Washington, D.C., U.S., November 7, 2017.Credit: Bloomberg
Amir Tibon
Amir Tibon
Washington

WASHINGTON - The American Civil Liberties Union announced on Wednesday that it has filed a legal challenge against a law in Texas that prohibits state contractors from boycotting Israel or its settlements in the West Bank. The lawsuit was filed by the organization on behalf of four Texas citizens who had either lost their jobs because of the law, or were “forced” to sign it against their beliefs in order not to lose their income.

The ACLU claims that the anti-boycott law in Texas, which went into effect last year, violates the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. An attorney for the organization explained on Wednesday that “whatever you may think about boycotts of Israel, the bottom line is that political boycotts are a legitimate form of nonviolent protest. The state cannot use the contracting process as an ideological litmus test or to tell people what kind of causes they may or may not support.” The ACLU does not take a position on boycotts of Israel, but it supports the principle that politically motivated boycotts are a protected form of speech.

>>WATCH: Texas speech pathologist fired for refusing to pledge not to boycott Israel

The Texas law being challenged by the ACLU made headlines earlier this week after The Intercept reported that a speech therapist at an elementary school lost her job after she refused to sign a pledge that she doesn’t support boycotts of Israel or “Israeli controlled territories.” The law doesn’t make any distinction between Israel as a country and the settlements it has built in the West Bank since 1967. The speech therapist is filing a separate lawsuit from the one brought forward by the ACLU.

Haaretz Weekly podcast, Episode 8

Last year, the same Texas law caused uproar after citizens who sought relief from hurricane damages were asked to sign a pledge that they oppose boycotts of Israel. At the time, state officials said the law was misinterpreted by local authorities. Over the past year, federal courts have frozen the implementation of two similar laws in Arizona and Kansas, because of constitutional concerns. In Kansas, the law was amended in order to ensure that it will affect only companies, not individual citizens.

Click the alert icon to follow topics:

Comments

SUBSCRIBERS JOIN THE CONVERSATION FASTER

Automatic approval of subscriber comments.
From $1 for the first month

SUBSCRIBE
Already signed up? LOG IN

ICYMI

בנימין נתניהו השקת ספר

Netanyahu’s Israel Is About to Slam the Door on the Diaspora

עדי שטרן

Head of Israel’s Top Art Academy Leads a Quiet Revolution

Charles Lindbergh addressing an America First Committee rally on October 3, 1941.

Ken Burns’ Brilliant ‘The U.S. and the Holocaust’ Has Only One Problem

Skyscrapers in Ramat Gan and Tel Aviv.

Israel May Have Caught the Worst American Disease, New Research Shows

ג'אמיל דקוור

Why the Head of ACLU’s Human Rights Program Has Regrets About Emigrating From Israel

ISRAEL-VOTE

Netanyahu’s Election Win Dealt a Grievous Blow to Judaism