Opinion

IfNotNow Hijacked Our Birthright Trip

Our trip was shattered by premeditated walk-out in which we, unwillingly, became part of the media spectacle that their activists had sought from the start. This is our side of the story

Eight Birthright participants who walked off their tour to visit the Sumreen family, under threat of eviction from their home in Silwan, East Jerusalem, July 15, 2018.
Olivier Fitoussi

Standing on a stone floor near an open balcony, we first-time visitors to Jerusalem with Birthright-Taglit closed our eyes, entrusting our hands and safety to friends. We rounded the corner and formed a small crowd at the edge of the balcony, opening our eyes to one of the holiest and certainly most iconic views in Judaism: the Western Wall. 

With gasps, tears, hugs, and quiet comradery, we took the time to truly appreciate the significance of where we stood. For many, this was the moment we finally began to feel we were home. 

Illustration: Birthright-Taglit participants at the Western Wall
תגלית

But that is all it was - just a moment - before it was shattered by a live-streamed, politically motivated, and carefully planned announcement by six members of our trip. 

They announced they would be leaving the trip to visit a Palestinian family. The activists said that their questions about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict had not been answered during the first few days of the trip, and they were appalled at the way Birthright had hidden the truth from them and presented a biased, right-wing agenda. 

>> Principled Activists or Entitled Brats? What's Wrong With the Birthright Walk-outs | Analysis >> Birthright's So Scared of Arabs It's Banned Them | Opinion 

This is not an accurate portrayal of our trip. Their speech gave them the media attention they were seeking, but it was filled with misrepresentation and distortion. We, the remaining participants of Taglit Israel Outdoors Bus 428, are here to set the record straight.

Throughout their abbreviated participation, these protesters used every opportunity to vocalize their viewpoints, using group discussions, evening relaxation time, bus rides, and hiking rest stops to share their emotionally-charged rhetoric about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict with the group. 

At first, most of us were receptive to their questions – we considered them an important dialogue to include in a trip well-known to be heavily funded by right-wing American donors and the Israeli government. 

When one activist stressed the need to include conversations about the conflict in our trip, our group leaders generously allowed her to lead a dialogue on the evening of our first full day, during which we discussed and debated the topic for hours. From the first day, the trip schedule had been altered to make space for their ideas.

Many of us, like the activists, had come to Israel intending to ask difficult questions as a meaningful and integral part of our experience. After the first night, one of us even volunteered to lead an effort to pen a group letter to Birthright expressing our disappointment at the lack of importance given to the Palestinian crisis on the trip. 

The rhetoric flowing from select group members, however, quickly became unreasonably aggressive and directed at our tour guide, who never avoided the topic, silenced their speech, or seemed to take offense at their disregard for his perspective. He answered each question calmly, patiently, and to the best of his ability, providing an extraordinarily neutral view of the conflict and acknowledging his bias as a former IDF soldier when necessary. 

When questions became incessant and repetitive, our guide repeatedly reminded the group that our schedule included a geopolitical discussion with a professor of Middle Eastern history later in the week, and that the professor would be better equipped to answer some of their specific questions. In fact, during that lecture, the professor answered questions in an open and honest way and encouraged us to do our own research and fact-checking on the information he presented us with. 

However, the activists did not stick around long enough to attend that discussion. Nor did they make any effort to connect with or ask questions of the seven Israelis who accompanied our trip, having lived in the midst of the conflict throughout their entire lives. 

The narrative being portrayed in the media, and the carefully selected scenes from a particularly frustrating bus ride, do not fully capture our group’s willingness, even eagerness, to discuss the conflict. 

>> IfNotNow Is So Noisy About the Occupation. Why Is It So Quiet About Israel's Right to Exist? | Opinion >> After Giving Them the Finger, Birthright Co-founder Slams ‘Stupid Left-wing Jews’ at Protest 

It became apparent only after the walk-off that everything had been premeditated. Four of the six protesters had already been working prior to the trip with IfNotNow, an activist group with the goal of changing how Birthright presents the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. 

It did not matter that the reality of our group and our tour guide did not match with the traumatic, partisan experience that IfNotNow led them to believe they would have - part of that "preparation" suggesting their tour guide would be crudely pro-Israel, and even Islamophobic. The genuine efforts of our guide and our group leaders to create space for dialogue were not enough for them. 

IfNotNow activists talking with young Birthright participants at JFK airport, New York City, July 30, 2018.
Gili Getz

So, at our most vulnerable moment, they pulled out their cameras and turned us into a media spectacle for political gain. They filmed us without our consent and sent videos of our group to news outlets to be broadcast to the world. 

When our guide expressed that he understood their decision and asked for ten minutes to follow procedure and contact Birthright’s office to prepare for their departure, they refused and stormed off. After their departure, they presented an incorrect narrative to the media, asserting that they could not grapple with the fact that Birthright refused to bring Palestinian perspectives to the table. 

Yet, we all knew what we had signed up for; we saw the itinerary ahead of time and agreed to Birthright’s terms. Our tour guide said it best: Birthright is paid for by the Israeli government and that government is not going to allow an anti-Israel activist to speak to the group. We came on the trip with the knowledge that we would be seeing Israel as the Israeli government wants it to be seen. 

Furthermore, we were brought to Israel to connect with our Jewish heritage and to bolster the Israeli economy, not to solve a major geopolitical conflict in ten days. We were Israel’s guests and we were not "owed" anything on this all-expense-paid trip. 

It is not wrong to challenge the narrative you are presented with, to ask difficult questions, and to seek out multiple opinions. 

Emil Salman

However, these activists took advantage of the trip and took spots away from others in order to stage a political stunt, and then pretended that the structure of the trip surprised them. 

The activists had many options to see the other side of the conflict and to promote change. They could have, as our own tour guide encouraged them to do, extended their trip to visit the West Bank and hear from Palestinians. This would have allowed them to remain on the trip for its entire duration and calmly encourage further dialogue and education about the conflict within our group. They could have written a letter to Birthright, as our group had planned, to express their discomfort with the program’s omission of the Palestinian perspective. 

>> U.S. Jews Have Enabled Israel's Occupation. Now We Must End It | Opinion >> It's Only About Them: U.S. Jews' Outrage on the Wall, Silence on the Occupation Is Obscene | Opinion >> U.S. Jewish Liberals Won’t Be Manning the Anti-occupation Barricades Anytime Soon | Opinion

If they had not isolated themselves, they could have worked within the system to gain support and create a network of Birthright alumni who could push for future change to the trip’s itinerary. Instead, they left and took their viewpoint with them. 

They were not interested in seeing both sides of the conflict, as they claimed. They came on the trip with clear "right and wrong" sides in their heads and refused to hear anything that might contradict their ironclad opinions. Instead of responsibly hearing from both sides, they chose to hear a one-sided narrative from the Palestinian perspective. 

Fostering discourse and political debate is a positive thing; many of us writing this letter have differing political opinions. Judaism has always included critical thinking and the importance of discussion in its teachings. One of the fundamentals of being a good Jew is to be inquisitive. We are taught to ask questions and to debate, but also to be open-minded. 

We support the activists’ right to speak their beliefs, but we do not support the method by which they were expressed. We wish they had chosen to stay on our trip and had continued the conversation that we began on our first night in a more productive and friendly way. 

Sara Lodgen is a higher education professional from Boston, MA. She works and travels in Israel extensively and was a participant on Israel Outdoors Bus 428. 

Ben Fields works and studies higher education access and studied World Politics with a focus on peace and conflict studies as well as education. He was also a participant on Israel Outdoors Bus 428.

Full list of signatories to this article (alphabetical order by last name), all of whom were participants in the Birthright-Taglit trip of Bus 428 starting July 10, 2018:

Rachel Barron

Joshua Barza

Elijah Bloom

Spencer Campbell

Emily Cobert

Eva Cutler

Ben Fields

Danielle Ginsburg

Evan Harris

Elizabeth Kahen

Michaela Kaplan

Andrew Kaufman 

Sara Lodgen

Josh Moore

Dan Sherman

Leanna Smith 

Hayley Targe

Sam Tolkin

Avital Tsivkin

Charlotte Weiss