Editorial |

Listen to Eisenkot, Not to Bennett

There are partners who are willing to help Israel and the Palestinians. The government must advance sustainable plans before and instead of rushing into war

Haaretz.
Haaretz Editorial
Send in e-mailSend in e-mail
Send in e-mailSend in e-mail
Gadi Eisenkot chats with his predecessor Benny Gantz during a visit to the Western Wall, February 16, 2015.
Gadi Eisenkot chats with his predecessor Benny Gantz during a visit to the Western WalCredit: Gil Cohen-Magen/AFP Photo
Haaretz.
Haaretz Editorial

A puzzling dialogue is taking place between the Israeli military and the country’s political leadership. The push by certain politicians for a comprehensive war of choice in order to end the incendiary kites and balloons being launched from the Gaza Strip into Israel has so far been stopped by the army, but it’s doubtful that it can withstand the pressure of the warmongers.

Until recently the Israel Defense Forces and Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Gadi Eisenkot have made it clear that there is no military solution to the struggle being waged by 2 million Palestinians against the closure and the dire hardship of the Strip. The IDF urged the government to adopt a lenient policy, to allow goods to enter the territory and Gazans to leave for work in Israel and the West Bank. That, in order to at least remove the economic catalyst for the uprising. This wise advice was thrown out in the battle for political prestige being fought between leaders of the right.

The army apparently recognizes the limits of its power to persuade the cabinet to listen to reason, so it is trying its hand at political persuasion. Paradoxically, the IDF is forced, in violation of its own position, to ask the government to actually increase the economic pressure on the Gaza Strip in order to convey an additional message to Hamas — as a last measure before war. It’s doubtful the government has any remaining economic punishments to impose, after closing the Kerem Shalom crossing and restricting the goods allowed to enter the Strip to staple products and medicines.

The army doesn’t set policy, but it repeatedly sends a clear message: The closure will not be effective in stopping the confrontations, and kites and fire balloons are not a cause for war (Amos Harel, Haaretz Wednesday). It is good for Israelis to hear this position, in light of comments by bloodthirsty politicians such as Habayit Hayehudi Chairman Naftali Bennett, who at a recent security cabinet meeting suggested to the chief of staff that he drop a bomb on groups launching kites and balloons. “It’s against my operational and moral positions,” Eisenkot replied.

Those chomping at the bit for a military operation to end the attacks from the Gaza Strip “once and for all” should recall the previous glorious campaigns such as Operation Pillar of Defense and Operation Protective Edge. They provided periods of calm but did not eliminate the roots of the conflict.

There are partners who are willing to help Israel and the Palestinians to reach understandings over the confrontation in the Gaza Strip. Sustainable plans that could yield long-term quiet are on the table. After the end of every military operation or war that Israel conducts in Gaza, those same plans will be on the agenda. The government must advance these plans before and instead of rushing into war. The Israeli public doesn’t need a grand show that begins with a horrifying display of force and ends with destruction and the loss of life.

The above article is Haaretz’s lead editorial, as published in the Hebrew and English newspapers in Israel.

Click the alert icon to follow topics:

Comments

SUBSCRIBERS JOIN THE CONVERSATION FASTER

Automatic approval of subscriber comments.
From $1 for the first month

SUBSCRIBE
Already signed up? LOG IN

ICYMI

Charles Lindbergh addressing an America First Committee rally on October 3, 1941.

Ken Burns’ Brilliant ‘The U.S. and the Holocaust’ Has Only One Problem

The projected rise in sea level on a beach in Haifa over the next 30 years.

Facing Rapid Rise in Sea Levels, Israel Could Lose Large Parts of Its Coastline by 2050

Tal Dilian.

As Israel Reins in Its Cyberarms Industry, an Ex-intel Officer Is Building a New Empire

Queen Elizabeth II, King Charles III and a British synagogue.

How the Queen’s Death Changes British Jewry’s Most Distinctive Prayer

Newly appointed Israeli ambassador to Chile, Gil Artzyeli, poses for a group picture alongside Rabbi Yonatan Szewkis, Chilean deputy Helia Molina and Gerardo Gorodischer, during a religious ceremony in a synagogue in Vina del Mar, Chile last week.

Chile Community Leaders 'Horrified' by Treatment of Israeli Envoy

Queen Elizabeth attends a ceremony at Windsor Castle, in June 2021.

Over 120 Countries, but Never Israel: Queen Elizabeth II's Unofficial Boycott