As a member of the faculty at Princeton University and an active participant in the activities of the university’s Center for Jewish Life, I was surprised and disappointed over the mini-crisis last week surrounding the visit by Israel's Deputy Foreign Minister Tzipi Hotovely.
- Hillel Apologizes for Canceling Israeli Deputy FM's Princeton Talk
- Hillel Cancels Princeton Speech by Israeli Deputy FM
- Hillel Threatened to Cut Ties With Israeli Gov't Over Database
- In America, the Right to Boycott Israel Is Under Threat
As I was not advised of or consulted about either her visit or the subsequent postponement – effectively a cancellation – I have some standing to comment on the situation.
The decision to invite Minister Hotovely was the right one, as all elected members of the Israeli government are welcome to speak on our campus. Personal views of the invitee and/or Israeli policies should not figure in the decision to extend an invitation to speak.
The process regarding the invitation was faulty, as it did not follow the Center for Jewish Life’s own procedures. The process also was lacking in not trying to situate the deputy minister’s visit within the context of a series of "Conversations about Peace" that I co-chair with another faculty member, that is designed to bring divergent views to the campus so as to stimulate mutually respectful dialogue.
The protest by some student groups on campus was also a legitimate expression of views and part of what constitutes respectful dissent. The students should have been invited to attend the speech and ask questions, or to protest peacefully outside the speech venue.
The decision to postpone/cancel the visit was wrong, plain and simple. Rabbi Julie Roth, the Center for Jewish Life’s director, regretted that decision almost immediately, as she told me on Monday morning after the fact.
By that time, however, the Israeli Consulate had already reached out to the university Chabad, which agreed to sponsor the talk at the originally scheduled time and venue. The speech took place with a full room and a few quiet protesters outside.
The following day, Tuesday, Rabbi Roth and Eric Fingerhut, head of Hillel International, wrote to publicly express regret for the mistaken decision to cancel the talk and reiterating the Center for Jewish Life’s open-door policy for elected Israeli officials. This apology should have been the end of the affair.
This was totally wrong, and under no circumstances would this have made sense, certainly not after the Center for Jewish Life and Hillel apologized.
Israel works hard to prevent boycotts, and thus no Israeli official should be calling for a boycott of an institution designed to promote Jewish life on campus. Oren now must take the next step: To retract his call for a boycott. Indeed, an apology from him for even raising the idea would also be proper.
The bottom line in this issue is clear: There are many lessons to learn from what happened last week, and I am confident the Center for Jewish Life will assimilate those lessons. I’m proud of the respectful atmosphere on the Princeton campus when discussing the Israel-Palestine dispute and am sure that this will continue when our series of "Conversations about Peace" welcomes former Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad and Israeli Consul General Dani Dayan in the weeks ahead.
Daniel Kurtzer, a professor at Princeton University’s Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, served as the U.S. ambassador to Israel from 2001 to 2005.