Debate Analysis |

Despot Trump’s Treachery Against America

Donald Trump capped his entire despotic and poisonous race for the White House with his refusal to accept the final results of the U.S. elections. If even one American Jew votes for him, it will be one too many.

Samuel G. Freedman
Samuel G. Freedman
Send in e-mailSend in e-mail
Republican nominee Donald Trump gestures during the final presidential debate in Las Vegas, Nevada on October 19, 2016.
Republican nominee Donald Trump gestures during the final presidential debate in Las Vegas, Nevada on October 19, 2016. Credit: Robyn Beck, AFP
Samuel G. Freedman
Samuel G. Freedman

During the Democratic convention in 1924, the nativist and populist William Jennings Bryan gazed across the floor of Madison Square Garden at the supporters of Al Smith, the first Roman Catholic to pursue the presidency. “You are not the future of our country,” Bryan declared.

As we now know, in the fullness of time, Bryan was completely wrong. The immigrants and children of immigrants whom Smith represented, very much including American Jews, formed the political majority of the United States from 1932 for decades onward.

Being a voter and citizen during the ascent of a homegrown fascist, I try to take comfort from this historical example. Donald Trump’s hateful campaign and authoritarian rhetoric have tested my patriotic faith in American exceptionalism, including my lifelong belief that anti-Semitism has shrunken to the province of a deviant fringe of our society.

The Republican nominee amply displayed his abrasive, baleful, treacherous traits during this third and final presidential debate. Not that anyone should have been taken by surprise. Absent any evidence, Trump propounded the notion that the November 8 election is “rigged” and subject to massive “voter fraud,” all but inviting a Constitutional crisis in the former case and vigilante violence in the latter.

During the debate, in response to moderator Chris Wallace’s question about accepting the election result, Trump truculently shot back, “I’ll keep you in suspense.” And keep in mind that Wallace is the voice of Fox News, an auxiliary of the Republican Party and the Tea Party movement, hardly the stereotype of the “liberal media.”

Trump’s answers last night were the familiar vague boasts, augmented by bizarre mistakes, like using a term for the African-American “Great Migration” from the rural South to the urban North as his phrase for the exodus of Syrian refugees from that nation’s civil war.

Then again, Trump probably lumps African Americans and Muslims into his bucket of pariahs. Considering his fervent support from the Jew-haters of the alt right, Trump has perhaps done more than anyone to restore the black-Jewish alliance of the Civil Rights Movement and to establish a Muslim-Jewish coalition that can survive disagreement over the Israel-Palestine issue.

America is my country, and, despite efforts made to the contrary, an ignorant, dangerous demagogue cannot be seen as the Jewish choice simply because he mouths a few belligerent talking points that happen to include opposing the Iran deal.

If even one American Jew votes for Donald Trump, it will be one too many. His Jewish apologists, from Dennis Prager to Ari Fleischer to the Republican Jewish Coalition, indeed his Jewish son-in-law Jared Kushner, should be viewed as nothing less than enablers.

As the debate made abundantly clear, this current election is not a reasonable variation on a normative theme – not Nixon vs. Humphrey, Reagan vs. Mondale, not W. vs. Kerry. It is an existential moment in the life of America, in which even a flawed, often unappealing Democratic centrist is the firewall against the real-life reenactment of Philip Roth’s alt-history novel “The Plot Against America.”

At one point last night, addressing a question about border control, Trump said perhaps the only true thing he has in his entire despotic and poisonous race for the White House. But, being just as clueless as William Jennings Bryan nearly a century ago, I suspect he didn’t recognize the real meaning of his words, coming from someone flourishing the power of destruction. And those words were: “We either have a country or we don’t.”

Samuel G. Freedman, the author of books including “Jew vs. Jew,” is a regular contributor to Haaretz. Follow him on Twitter: @SamuelGFreedman

Click the alert icon to follow topics:

Comments

SUBSCRIBERS JOIN THE CONVERSATION FASTER

Automatic approval of subscriber comments.
From $1 for the first month

Already signed up? LOG IN

ICYMI

Charles Lindbergh addressing an America First Committee rally on October 3, 1941.

Ken Burns’ Brilliant ‘The U.S. and the Holocaust’ Has Only One Problem

The projected rise in sea level on a beach in Haifa over the next 30 years.

Facing Rapid Rise in Sea Levels, Israel Could Lose Large Parts of Its Coastline by 2050

Tal Dilian.

As Israel Reins in Its Cyberarms Industry, an Ex-intel Officer Is Building a New Empire

Queen Elizabeth II, King Charles III and a British synagogue.

How the Queen’s Death Changes British Jewry’s Most Distinctive Prayer

Newly appointed Israeli ambassador to Chile, Gil Artzyeli, poses for a group picture alongside Rabbi Yonatan Szewkis, Chilean deputy Helia Molina and Gerardo Gorodischer, during a religious ceremony in a synagogue in Vina del Mar, Chile last week.

Chile Community Leaders 'Horrified' by Treatment of Israeli Envoy

Queen Elizabeth attends a ceremony at Windsor Castle, in June 2021.

Over 120 Countries, but Never Israel: Queen Elizabeth II's Unofficial Boycott