The Curious Criminal Investigations of Israeli Politicians

When Attorney General Avichai Mendelblit’s candidacy for attorney general came up, I thought it was a bad idea. It’s not that he’s lacking the skills or the integrity – the personal relationships are the story.

Raviv Drucker
Raviv Drucker
Send in e-mailSend in e-mail
Avichai Mendelblit (right) consults with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a weekly cabinet meeting, September 2015.
Avichai Mendelblit (right) consults with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a cabinet meeting, September 2015.Credit: Ohad Zwigenberg (Pool)
Raviv Drucker
Raviv Drucker

An attorney general is frequently tested by how he handles investigations of public figures. At least three such probes are on Attorney General Avichai Mendelblit’s desk right now.

The investigation into Zionist Union leader Isaac Herzog, as far as is known, focuses on a single donation of 40,000 shekels (about $10,500) to help fund his Labor Party primary campaign against Shelly Yacimovich. This is a simple probe, which was opened a year ago and whose existence is known. Still, Mendelblit has yet to say whether he believes there’s a case here or not.

The attorney general began, as usual, with an “examination,” which quickly became an “investigation.” Why? There didn’t seem to have been any dramatic development; perhaps it was because the examination got publicity. Herzog was last questioned as a possible suspect two months ago and since then nothing has happened. According to leaked information, the case is about to be closed, but the Attorney General’s Office is mum.

One can’t ignore the question marks regarding Minister Arye Dery’s case, either. The covert examination of the Negev and Galilee development minister’s affairs began when the police got information about suspicious money transfers from James Schlaff, brother of Austrian tycoon Martin Schlaff, to Dery’s brother, attorney Shlomo Dery. The Schlaff-Dery connection lit up all the police’s warning lights, which is logical.

But here, too, we go back to Mendelblit’s behavior. Very quickly he announced he was moving from an examination to an investigation. Why? Perhaps it was to allow some type of police action, or perhaps it was simply because the probe was revealed. Dery has yet to be questioned and the issue is hanging over his head. According to leaked information, there is no case, but the Attorney General’s Office is mum.

The deplorable “examination,” a term only used for public figures, is not Mendelblit’s invention, but petitions to the High Court of Justice by MK Miki Rosenthal gave the attorney general an opportunity to do away with it. He did not exploit this opportunity. When it comes to the “examination” of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s affairs, the distortion only becomes clearer.

I remembered how the criminal investigation into the nonprofit associations affiliated with Ehud Barak began. In January 2000 State Comptroller Eliezer Goldberg issued a report alleging that Barak’s associates had channeled illegal contributions to a host of nonprofits. Goldberg sent the report to then-Attorney General Elyakim Rubinstein, who is not known as a quick decision-maker. Yet even as Barak was polishing his speech in response to the report, his bureau was informed that the attorney general had ordered the opening of a criminal investigation. No “examination” required. How curiously simple.

The suspicions against Netanyahu are enough for police to have grilled one of his most prominent fundraisers, Ari Harow, for more than 20 hours, much of that time as a possible suspect. But apparently this is still not enough to move from an examination to an investigation. Why was there enough to move Herzog and Dery from examination to investigation, but not Netanyahu?

When Mendelblit’s candidacy for attorney general came up, I thought it was a bad idea. It’s not that he’s lacking the skills or the integrity – the personal relationships are the story. Mendelblit had been on excellent terms with Herzog, Dery and Netanyahu, and he helped Dery when good-government groups petitioned the High Court against his being appointed a minister at all, and interior minister in particular. Netanyahu appointed him to the post. It’s no surprise that the subjects of these examinations feel free to call him about the examinations against them.

Last week Mendelblit came to the Knesset and admitted that it was complicated to be sitting with Netanyahu on the government’s ongoing work one minute, and the next on the investigations against him. Harow was also friendly with Mendelblit. Would Mendelblit have made the same decisions about his questioning if he hadn’t known him? Would the politicians under investigation dared to have called Menachem Mazuz, now a Supreme Court justice, when he was attorney general?

It could be that the decisions Mendelblit makes in these cases will all be reasonable. Still, it will be hard to convince the public that the same decisions would have been taken if he hadn’t been these people’s friend.

Click the alert icon to follow topics:



Automatic approval of subscriber comments.
From $1 for the first month

Already signed up? LOG IN


בנימין נתניהו השקת ספר

Netanyahu’s Israel Is About to Slam the Door on the Diaspora

עדי שטרן

Head of Israel’s Top Art Academy Leads a Quiet Revolution

Charles Lindbergh addressing an America First Committee rally on October 3, 1941.

Ken Burns’ Brilliant ‘The U.S. and the Holocaust’ Has Only One Problem

Skyscrapers in Ramat Gan and Tel Aviv.

Israel May Have Caught the Worst American Disease, New Research Shows

ג'אמיל דקוור

Why the Head of ACLU’s Human Rights Program Has Regrets About Emigrating From Israel


Netanyahu’s Election Win Dealt a Grievous Blow to Judaism