Court-sanctioned Discrimination Committees

High Court's decision to uphold the residential screening law - intended to keep Arabs out of small communities - will have a chilling effect on battle against discrimination.

Haaretz.
Haaretz Editorial
Send in e-mailSend in e-mail
Adel Kaadan outside his home in the town of Katzir, which challenged his right to live there because he is Arab.
Adel Kaadan outside his home in the town of Katzir, which challenged his right to live there because he is Arab.Credit: Moran Mayan / Jini
Haaretz.
Haaretz Editorial

The decision of the High Court of Justice to reject several petitions against a law allowing one type of small rural community to screen applicants using an admissions committee is yet another expression of a worldview that prefers passivity to judicial activism, and whose leading practitioner is Supreme Court President Asher Grunis. This narrow 5-4 ruling by an expanded panel of justices is liable to have a chilling effect on the battle against various kinds of discrimination in Israel. Granted, the law’s drafters intended it to be used primarily to keep Arabs out of such intentional communities, which in Hebrew are called yishuvim kehilati’im, or community settlements. But the law will also affect other groups whose members are seen as threatening the rather homogenous social fabric of these communities.

The admissions committee law, which was enacted in 2011, allows small communities in the Negev or the Galilee built on state lands to condition membership on the approval of a screening committee. Under the law, the committee may reject candidates deemed unsuitable to the “social life” or the “sociocultural fabric” of the community. In contrast to other discriminatory laws, which the state is responsible for carrying out, in this case the legislature placed the power to discriminate in the hands of ordinary citizens.

According to Grunis, it is too early to know how the law will be applied in practice, and therefore, the arguments raised in the petitions are “hypothetical and theoretical claims.” But Justice Salim Joubran, writing for the minority, wrote that the admissions committees are nothing but “a mechanism for enshrining and perpetuating a discriminatory situation.”

Admissions committees in community settlements rejected undesirable applicants, mainly Arabs, even before the law went into effect, and judging from a few recent incidents very little has changed. The protections that were added to the law are insufficient to ensure that vague admissions criteria will not be used to perpetrate unacceptable discrimination. But the deeper problem pertains to the very existence of such a screening mechanism.

In his ruling, Grunis noted that “At present, the court does not have a sufficient factual basis for a decision.” It must be hoped that future petitioners will return to the court in order to examine the validity of the law in practice, and that yishuvim kehilati’im will eschew discrimination in creating an appropriate composition in these communities.

Click the alert icon to follow topics:

Comments

SUBSCRIBERS JOIN THE CONVERSATION FASTER

Automatic approval of subscriber comments.
From $1 for the first month

Already signed up? LOG IN

ICYMI

The Orion nebula, photographed in 2009 by the Spitzer Telescope.

What if the Big Bang Never Actually Happened?

Relatives mourn during the funeral of four teenage Palestinians from the Nijm family killed by an errant rocket in Jabalya in the northern Gaza Strip, August 7.

Why Palestinian Islamic Jihad Rockets Kill So Many Palestinians

בן גוריון

'Strangers in My House': Letters Expelled Palestinian Sent Ben-Gurion in 1948, Revealed

AIPAC

AIPAC vs. American Jews: The Toxic Victories of the 'pro-Israel' Lobby

Bosnian Foreign Minister Bisera Turkovic speaks during a press conference in Sarajevo, Bosnia in May.

‘This Is Crazy’: Israeli Embassy Memo Stirs Political Storm in the Balkans

Hamas militants take part in a military parade in Gaza.

Israel Rewards Hamas for Its Restraint During Gaza Op