The Bedouin Threat That Never Was

The Bedouin aren't enemies of the state, no matter how broad the state's current interpretation of 'subversion' is.

Haaretz.
Haaretz Editorial
Send in e-mailSend in e-mail
Arab woman and Israeli police at anti-Prawer demonstration, July 2013.
Arab woman and Israeli police at anti-Prawer demonstration, July 2013.Credit: Ilan Assayag
Haaretz.
Haaretz Editorial

The Prawer Law, which is meant to regularize Bedouin communities in the Negev, has been revealed not only as a threat to the property and way of life of tens of thousands of Bedouin, but also as a security threat to the State of Israel, no less.

After all, had this law never existed, the Shin Bet security service wouldn’t have needed to summon Bedouin social activists who demonstrated against the law to come in for questioning, warn them not to undermine national security, make clear that it had detailed information about them, demand that they give information about their friends and relatives, and subject them to humiliating searches. This is precisely the kind of treatment given to wanted men or suspected terrorists. Fortunately for the demonstrators, the Shin Bet refrained from seeking to put them in administrative detention.

The demonstrations against the Prawer Law – unlike those of the ultra-Orthodox, the Ashdod Port workers, the victims of the Gindi construction company or any other group comprised of Jews – were defined by the state, in its response to a High Court of Justice petition filed by the Association for Civil Rights in Israel, as “violent activity that borders on disturbing the peace, with a subversive, nationalist foundation.” Therefore, it continued, these demonstrations are “within the Shin Bet’s jurisdiction.”

Does the state have any proof of “subversion with a nationalist foundation”? Didn’t the ultra-Orthodox demonstrations against the draft subvert Israel’s security religion, which sees mandatory conscription as one of its national foundations? And in general, how is a citizen to know whether his protest is subversive, nationalist or damaging to national security when the state’s interpretation of these terms is so broad that no one is immune from being summoned to the Shin Bet’s offices? This interpretation is no less dangerous than the fact that the Bedouin activists were summoned to begin with.

In its response to the petition, the state ignores the reason for the Bedouin demonstrations, as well as the fact that the state itself backtracked on implementing the Prawer Law because it discovered that the law had problems. If there’s any threat of a clash between the Bedouin and state institutions, it lies in the law’s problematic provisions, and in the ongoing disregard of the Bedouin demand that their unrecognized villages be recognized, connected to water and electricity and given paved roads and health clinics.

This discriminatory policy rests on the assumption that an entire sector of the population can be treated as vassals at the mercy of their lord, and therefore any protest is by definition meant to undermine his rule and should be considered hostile activity.

The Bedouin aren’t enemies of the state, and their protest is legitimate. The state is entitled to indict people for violence, but it must not turn the Shin Bet into a political agent of the executive branch charged with “chilling” protests. This is a red line that must not be crossed.

Click the alert icon to follow topics:

Comments

SUBSCRIBERS JOIN THE CONVERSATION FASTER

Automatic approval of subscriber comments.

Subscribe today and save 40%

Already signed up? LOG IN

ICYMI

Palestinians search through the rubble of a building in which Khaled Mansour, a top Islamic Jihad militant was killed following an Israeli airstrike in Rafah, southern Gaza strip, on Sunday.

Gazans Are Tired of Pointless Wars and Destruction, and Hamas Listens to Them

Trump and Netanyahu at the White House in Washington, in 2020.

Three Years Later, Israelis Find Out What Trump Really Thought of Netanyahu

German soldier.

The Rival Jewish Spies Who Almost Changed the Course of WWII

Rio. Not all Jewish men wear black hats.

What Does a Jew Look Like? The Brits Don't Seem to Know

Galon. “I’m coming to accomplish a specific mission: to increase Meretz’s strength and ensure that the party will not tread water around the electoral threshold. If Meretz will be large enough, it will be the basis for a Jewish-Arab partnership.” Daniel Tchetchik

'I Have No Illusions About Ending the Occupation, but the Government Needs the Left'

Soldiers using warfare devices made by the Israeli defense electronics company Elbit Systems.

Russia-Ukraine War Catapults Israeli Arms Industry to Global Stage