Obama’s Wise Decision to Back Down

The lesson of embracing a diplomatic solution over a military one can be applied to Iran as well.

Haaretz Editorial
Send in e-mailSend in e-mail
Haaretz Editorial

President Barack Obama, who brandished a massive sword over Bashar Assad's head in recent weeks, returned it to its sheath Wednesday. In due course he may draw it again to strike the Syrian regime, but the chance of this is diminishing.

Obama realized that the saber-rattling isn't that effective when the sword he is brandishing is a double-edged one. Without solid support from inside and out, implementing the military option could do more harm than good. All the more so since the sword was presented in advance as a weapon not intended to decapitate Assad, but only to punish him for using chemical weapons against civilians and to send a message about America's resolve at enforcing a behavior code.

Obama's speech to the American nation, which turned against him across the board – from the Congress to the Pentagon, from the masses to his own wife – marked more than anything else the limits of military intervention. This intervention was ultimately suspended - at least until a new speech. Thus, a limited strike, from afar, without boots on the ground and without any intention of toppling Assad, lest the responsibility for managing the chaos in Damascus be placed on Washington, was aborted. Due to the objections to an operation of such limited scope, one which Obama was dragged into and one which contradicts the platform he had back when he was a senator, the president jumped at the diplomatic opportunity offered by the Russians. There's nothing wrong with that – any plan to solve the crisis must be agreed upon, in broad terms, by the leading powers.

The U.S. president's general direction is commendable – preferring diplomatic means over military ones. If Assad's chemical weapons are subjected to international inspection and gradually dismantled, then the main goal of the Americans will be achieved, with even greater efficiency than through a military operation. A strike would hit those responsible for using the weapons, but would not touch the chemical warfare stockpile itself, which could then be dispersed and harm the Syrian people.

The combination of contained military power and diplomatic leverage, exercised mainly by Assad's chief patron Russian President Vladimir Putin, is more practical than a military strike with no strategic follow-up plan.

It is also a lesson that can be applied to the Iranian nuclear issue. A broad international front – American, Russian and Chinese, without the prominence of Israel – must set realistic, not messianic goals and do so without the urge to pull the trigger, if it is to prod the Iranian leadership into making sober decisions.

U.S. President Barack Obama and Russia’s President Vladimir Putin (left) shake hands at a G-20 summit last year. Obama jumped at Russia's diplomatic proposal.Credit: AP

Click the alert icon to follow topics:



Automatic approval of subscriber comments.
From $1 for the first month

Already signed up? LOG IN


Charles Lindbergh addressing an America First Committee rally on October 3, 1941.

Ken Burns’ Brilliant ‘The U.S. and the Holocaust’ Has Only One Problem

The projected rise in sea level on a beach in Haifa over the next 30 years.

Facing Rapid Rise in Sea Levels, Israel Could Lose Large Parts of Its Coastline by 2050

Tal Dilian.

As Israel Reins in Its Cyberarms Industry, an Ex-intel Officer Is Building a New Empire

Queen Elizabeth II, King Charles III and a British synagogue.

How the Queen’s Death Changes British Jewry’s Most Distinctive Prayer

Newly appointed Israeli ambassador to Chile, Gil Artzyeli, poses for a group picture alongside Rabbi Yonatan Szewkis, Chilean deputy Helia Molina and Gerardo Gorodischer, during a religious ceremony in a synagogue in Vina del Mar, Chile last week.

Chile Community Leaders 'Horrified' by Treatment of Israeli Envoy

Queen Elizabeth attends a ceremony at Windsor Castle, in June 2021.

Over 120 Countries, but Never Israel: Queen Elizabeth II's Unofficial Boycott