Analysis

Putin's Syria Victory Lap Teaches Middle Eastern Leaders One Important Lesson

Visiting Syria, Egypt and Turkey in one day, Putin establishes himself as the only world leader with real influence in the Middle East

Russian President Vladimir Putin, center, Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu, right, and Syrian President Bashar Assad visiting the Khmeimim air base in Latakia Province, Syriam December 11, 2017.
Sputnik/Mikhail Klimentyev/Sputnik via Reuters

As Russian President Vladimir Putin landed Monday morning at Khmeimim air base in Syria, the first person to greet him as he stepped onto the tarmac was a Russian military officer. Only then was he approached by Syrian President Bashar Assad, and together they walked down the runway, passing Russian bomber jets and attack helicopters.

To really understand the Middle East - subscribe to Haaretz

The message was clear. The first visit to Syria in seven years by a foreign leader wasnt a regular state visit: Putin was there to inspect Russias latest outpost.

He may have taken the opportunity to announce that Russia is to begin withdrawing most of its troops from Syria. But that was mainly a statement for domestic consumption – back home, the idea of foreign wars isnt very popular.

>> Putin: Trump's Recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's Capital Destabilizes Middle East

On the ground in Syria, though, the message was very different. Russia now has its permanent base in the Middle East, and just because the battle against the Islamic State is winding down, that doesnt mean the Russian aircraft will be leaving anytime soon. 

Putins short stop in Khmeimim, on his way to a longer visit to Cairo in Egypt and Ankara in Turkey, was very much a victory lap. Twenty-seven months since the Russian deployment to Syria began, no one has any illusions that, as far as the Kremlin is concerned, this has been a resounding success. There were expectations that this foreign intervention in a Mideast war would end in tears, as so many previous ones had. But not this time.

Questions were raised over whether Russias military – still undergoing a transition from its old and unwieldy Soviet Red Army version – could carry out a prolonged and long-range deployment of this scale. But despite a few mishaps, which included the smoke-shrouded arrival of the ineffective aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov last year, the modernized Russian army pulled it off. 

Of course, this was nothing like the interventions of the United States and its allies in recent years. Putins aims were not to bring democracy and freedom to Syria. On the contrary, he set out to keep a blood-soaked dictator in place, and did so by indiscriminately bombing civilian targets that were held by rebel forces.

>> With Syria strikes, Israel shows it's willing to risk a new front with Iran | Analysis

Putin plays by Moscow rules, and by those rules this has indeed been a resounding success. He has kept an ally in place, cemented a strategic regional alliance that includes Iran, ensured Russia has long-term rights for air and sea bases in the Mediterranean (Khmeimim and the port of Tartus) and established himself as the only world leader with real influence in the region. 

Putin did all this despite Russias faltering economy, hit by plunging oil prices and Western sanctions over Ukraine, and despite the threat of Islamist terror attacks on Russian soil in retaliation. He did it because he identified a historic opportunity during the presidency of Barack Obama, with the United States in retreat from the region, to assert Russian power instead. Obama opened the door for Russia, and President Donald Trump is now keeping it wide open. 

It is important to keep Putins achievement in focus. He hasnt rebuilt Syria and has no intention of doing so. Unlike the United States, which poured hundreds of billions of dollars in civilian aid into Iraq and Afghanistan, Putins approach is a much more instrumental one. To the victor the spoils, and he certainly has no intention of picking up any tabs.

Syria will remain a ruined nation for decades to come, over half of its population uprooted and a quarter living outside the country as refugees. Putin never intended to save Syria, just the mass murderer who is still its president. For other countries in the region, including Israel, this means that for the time being at least, they have to deal with Putin regarding any postwar arrangements.

Absent from the ceremony at Khmeimim were Assads other patrons, the Iranians. But they are there to stay as well. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has already made clear that there is no obligation on the Russians or Iranians – who are both there at the invitation of the Syrian regime – to leave. And Russia, for the time being at least, is happy for Irans proxies, Hezbollah and other Shia militias, to provide the boots on the ground to continue pacifying the country, parts of which are still under rebel control. 

As far as Israel is concerned, Putin seems willing to listen to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahus concerns over Irans entrenchment in Syria. So far, though, he has yet to put any perceivable pressure on the Iranians, and there is no reason to believe he will.

On the other hand, no less significantly, Russia – which controls large parts of Syrias airspace – has not tried to block, or even publicly condemn, the airstrikes on Hezbollah and Iranian targets in Syria that foreign media have attributed to Israel.

Interestingly, weve seen a scaling-down of Netanyahus rhetoric: from demands of no Iranian presence in Syria, to no Iranian bases, and now to no missile factories. Netanyahu has understood. Putin respects power and prefers making his real deals behind the scenes. In Syria, everyone must play now by Moscow rules.