WATCH: The U.S. 'Should Have Attacked Iran' Instead of Iraq, Says Mark Levin

On the 'Mark Levin Show,' the talk radio host and former Reagan administration official did something 'that he had held off on doing for many years,' argued that the United States should have attacked Iran instead of Iraq in 2003.

Send in e-mailSend in e-mail
Talk radio host Mark Levin. Credit: Screen grab

Short transcript:

Mark Levin: I'm going to tell you something that I've only told family and my closest friends, and I've held off from telling you for many, many years because when we've had men and women in the theater fighting in Iraq I believe they should have gotten our complete support. And I believed in what they were trying to do, very much so.

But here's what I haven't said: I believed we attack the wrong country -- Mr. Producer, I don't think you've ever heard me say this -- we should have attacked Iran. Iran is spreading terrorism. Iran has global designs. Iran is responsible for the murder of American citizen and American soldiers. Not that I was opposed in anyway to taking out Saddam Hussein, I wasn't. Not under the guise of this democracy project, which I always thought was nutty, but because he was a horribly evil man doing horribly evil things. 

Video Via