Due to a bureaucratic mix-up, the the Civil Administration in the West Bank demolished two classrooms on Sunday that were used by children living in the Bedouin village of Abu Nuwar near the settlement of Ma’aleh Adumim.
The Civil Administration had ruled that the classrooms were built illegally without permits. However, the High Court of Justice last year ordered the Civil Administration to postpone the demolition until the legal status of the classrooms could be examined more thoroughly and all other administrative appeals had been exhausted.
On Friday residents of Abu Nuwar filed an appeal with the Civil Administration, extending the legal process, but due to miscommunication, the Civil Administration staff said they were unaware of the appeal.
The two classrooms were built last year. After the Civil Administration sought to demolish them for lack of proper permits, residents of the village filed their High Court petition. The justices decided not to rule on the petition, but ordered that no demolition work be carried out until 10 days after the Civil Administration made a final ruling on the matter. On January 24, a Civil Administration oversight subcommittee ruled against the villagers, who last Friday appealed to the Supreme Planning Council, meaning that the case was still pending. But on Sunday, prior to a hearing on the appeal, staff from the Civil Administration demolished the two classrooms.
A source said the enforcement staff of the Civil Administration had not known about the filing of the appeal last Friday because they don’t work on Fridays. As a result, they thought that the 10-day waiting period required by the court had passed without any further appeal.
- School could be out forever for these Bedouin kids in the West Bank
- Number of Arabs in Israeli higher education grew 79% in seven years
- Let the Bedouin have their schools
In another case, the Civil Administration hurriedly impounded solar panels in Abu Nuwar just before the High Court of Justice issued an order restraining the authorities from doing so. The move was at variance with the state’s general practice of not taking action in cases pending before the High Court until the court issues an interim order.