The chairman of the Central Elections Committee warned Thursday about foreign interference in the election campaign over the next two months, though he declined to say whether attempts had been uncovered.
“I can’t say that I’m at ease,” Hanan Melcer, who is also a Supreme Court justice, told reporters. “I’m concerned. The question of how many such attempts at interference will be successful is a function of the measures taken against them.”
Melcer said he had met with the head of the National Cyber Directorate at the Prime Minister’s Office, and the agency was addressing the problem.
>> 'Foreign country' intends to intervene in election, Shin Bet chief says ■ 'Russia doesn't interfere': Kremlin shrugs off Israeli warning ■ Massive manipulation, foreign influence campaign and cyber: The threats to Israel's election
Last month, the head of the Shin Bet security service said a foreign country intended to intervene in the election, though he did not name it, Channel 12 News reported.
- 'Foreign Country' Intends to Intervene in Israeli Elections, Shin Bet Chief Says
- Facebook to Block Anonymous Paid Political Ads Before Israel's Election
- Twitter Suspends Accounts Spreading Fake News to Israelis Ahead of Election
On Thursday, Melcer expressed particular concern about anonymous election advertising posted on social media. “The more anonymity can be curbed the better," he said.
This month Facebook announced that, as of March, it will to try to prevent the posting of anonymous campaign material on the social network before the April 9 election.
Asked whether the election committee had already uncovered attempts at foreign interference, Melcer said that “I would prefer not to answer that.”
When asked about combating election-related bots on social media – which generate automatic messages – he said the issue was being addressed.
Melcer was also asked about the new Likud party television channel on Facebook, where reality TV star Eliraz Sade has interviewed Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Melcer was asked whether the channel meets ethical standards on election advertising. “On the face of it, it doesn’t appear to be improper,” he said.