Israel's High Court Serves Notice: No More Two-year Budgets

But justices refrain from disallowing 2017-18 spending package now in force

Efrat Neuman
Efrat Neuman
Send in e-mailSend in e-mail
FILE PHOTO: Israel's High Court of Justice.
FILE PHOTO: Israel's High Court of Justice.Credit: Gil Yohanan
Efrat Neuman
Efrat Neuman

The Israeli government’s 2017-18 budget can remain in force, but the High Court of Justice warned in a ruling on Wednesday that it would likely disallow two-year budgets in the future.

The decision, which came in a 78-page opinion issued by an expanded seven-judge panel, came in response to a petition from the Ramat Gan Academic Center of Law and Business, which argued that the government has abused it power to temporarily amend laws via emergency regulations.

The justices ruled unanimously that the current amendment to the Basic Law, the temporary provision of the biannual budget, should not be repealed, but issued a nullification notice – in effect a warning – that it would not countenance amending the Basic Law again via an emergency for budget that extends beyond a single year.

Since Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu formed his first government in 2009, it has used two-year budgets more often than one-years that had been the norm, sometimes because elections interrupted the normal budget-making process and more recently because Netanyahu preferred to avoid the political risk to his coalition from a budget debate.

However, treasury officials voiced concerns that a two-year budget risked forcing the government into a spending plan that couldn’t be adjusted for a relatively long time in the face of changes to the economy.

To address that problem, the Knesset voted in August 2016 an amendment in the form of an emergency regulation that amended the Basic Law: State Budget that included a mechanism for adjusting the budget as it moved into 2018. If lawmakers failed by March 2018 to approve the changes, the government would automatically fall.

In its petition the Ramat Gan center said the Knesset abused its authority in approving the amendment. Then-Supreme Court Justice Elyakim Rubinstein, who wrote the opinion, agreed, saying the Knesset had undermined its responsibility to supervise government activities and the authority of the Basic Law by repeated amending it.

Click the alert icon to follow topics:

Comments

SUBSCRIBERS JOIN THE CONVERSATION FASTER

Automatic approval of subscriber comments.
From $1 for the first month

Already signed up? LOG IN

ICYMI

בנימין נתניהו השקת ספר

Netanyahu’s Israel Is About to Slam the Door on the Diaspora

עדי שטרן

Head of Israel’s Top Art Academy Leads a Quiet Revolution

Charles Lindbergh addressing an America First Committee rally on October 3, 1941.

Ken Burns’ Brilliant ‘The U.S. and the Holocaust’ Has Only One Problem

Skyscrapers in Ramat Gan and Tel Aviv.

Israel May Have Caught the Worst American Disease, New Research Shows

ג'אמיל דקוור

Why the Head of ACLU’s Human Rights Program Has Regrets About Emigrating From Israel

ISRAEL-VOTE

Netanyahu’s Election Win Dealt a Grievous Blow to Judaism