Study: Peace With Palestinians Could Add $120b to Israeli Coffers

Rand Corporation researchers say a new intifada would cost Israel $250b, but within 10 years of a two-state solution, Israelis would each see income rise by about $2,200.

Send in e-mailSend in e-mail
Rabin, Clinton and Arafat at the signing of the Israeli-PLO accord, Sept. 1993.
Rabin, Clinton and Arafat at the signing of the Israeli-PLO accord, Sept. 1993.Credit: Reuters

Israel's economy would gain more than $120 billion as a dividend in the next decade should a peace agreement be secured between the country and her neighbors, including the creation of a Palestinian state, according to a new study by a U.S.-based think tank.

Conducted by the Rand Corporation, the study also predicts that the Palestinians would realize $50 billion in economic benefits during that period, including a 36% jump in per capita income. By contrast, researchers said, a new wave of violence between Israel and the Palestinians would have a major negative economic impact on both sides in the conflict, with Israel alone losing out on a projected $250 billion in economic opportunities over the decade. As for the Palestinians' side, their per capital GDP could fall by as much as 46%, the authors noted.

The study, entitled “The Costs of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict,” also explored the impact of three other scenarios, contrasting their likely economic and security-related costs and benefits with current trends. The three options are what the Rand Corporation call “a coordinated unilateral withdrawal” by Israel from the West Bank; an uncoordinated withdrawal in which Palestinian coordination is absent; and nonviolent resistance to Israel on the part of the Palestinians.

“The implications of a unilateral withdrawal by Israel of West Bank settlers would depend greatly on the degree of coordination," according to the study. "If the Israelis were able to coordinate with both the Palestinians and international community, the overall impact on the Israeli economy would be negligible, and the Palestinian economy would benefit from an economic dividend of nearly $8 billion over a 10-year period. However, with no coordination, the Israelis would stand to lose $20 billion.

“In the nonviolent resistance scenario, Palestinians would take actions to put economic and international pressure on the Israelis - a scenario some observers note may already be unfolding. In this event, Israelis could lose $80 billion and Palestinians could lose $12 billion relative to current trends. But compared with a two-state solution, losses from the nonviolent resistance scenario become even more dramatic: about $200 billion for the Israelis and $60 billion for the Palestinians.”

“A two-state solution produces by far the best economic outcomes for both Israelis and Palestinians,” said Charles Ries, co-leader of the study and a vice president at Rand. “In a decade, the average Israeli would see his or her income rise by about $2,200 vs. a $1,000 gain for Palestinians, compared with our projection for present trends. But that only works out to 5% for each Israeli, vs. 36% for the average Palestinian, meaning Israelis have far less and Palestinians far more economic incentive to move toward peace.”

In a landmark speech at Bar-Ilan University in 2009, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared his support for a two-state solution involving establishment of a demilitarized Palestinian state “that would recognize the Jewish state.”

By contrast, in March of this year, in the run-up to that month’s Knesset election, the Prime Minister’s Office stated: “Prime Minister Netanyahu has made clear for years that given the current conditions in the Middle East, any territory that is given up will be seized by radical Islam, as was seen in the Gaza Strip and in southern Lebanon.” Such a scenario, it added, is particularly likely “in a reality in which the Palestinian Authority is in an alliance with the Hamas terrorist organization.”

Since the election, however, Netanyahu has reiterated his support for a demilitarized Palestinian state: At the end of last month, for example, he called on the Palestinians to enter negotiations with Israel, but without preconditions.

“I remain committed to the idea that the only way we can achieve a lasting peace is through the concept of two states for two peoples," he said. "A demilitarized Palestinian state that recognizes the Jewish nation-state of Israel."



Automatic approval of subscriber comments.

Subscribe today and save 40%

Already signed up? LOG IN


Trump and Netanyahu at the White House in Washington, in 2020.

Three Years Later, Israelis Find Out What Trump Really Thought of Netanyahu

German soldier.

The Rival Jewish Spies Who Almost Changed the Course of WWII

Rio. Not all Jewish men wear black hats.

What Does a Jew Look Like? The Brits Don't Seem to Know

Galon. “I’m coming to accomplish a specific mission: to increase Meretz’s strength and ensure that the party will not tread water around the electoral threshold. If Meretz will be large enough, it will be the basis for a Jewish-Arab partnership.” Daniel Tchetchik

'I Have No Illusions About Ending the Occupation, but the Government Needs the Left'

Soldiers using warfare devices made by the Israeli defense electronics company Elbit Systems.

Russia-Ukraine War Catapults Israeli Arms Industry to Global Stage

Flame and smoke rise during an Israeli air strike, amid Israel-Gaza fighting, in Gaza City August 6, 2022.

Israel Should End Gaza Operation Now, if It Can