Antitrust Ruling Strengthens Government Hand in Port Talks

Ruling bars state from holding talks with both port unions simultaneously.

Avi Bar-Eli
Avi Bar-Eli
Send in e-mailSend in e-mail
Send in e-mailSend in e-mail
Avi Bar-Eli
Avi Bar-Eli

The Israel Antitrust Authority has ruled that neither the unions nor the managements at Haifa and Ashdod ports could participate as a united front in negotiations over the government’s planned reform of the ports, ruling that it would be akin to forming a cartel.

The decision gives the government increased leverage in what are expected to be difficult talks over the reforms, which envisage creating one or two privately operating ports adjacent top the state-owned facilities.

Observers said the government will now be able to limit the scope of negotiations with the unions on how the reforms will be put into effect rather than on the reform itself. It also means that talks will be held separately with each of the ports’ workers committee, better allowing the government to flex its muscles.

The decision came as talks between the Finance Ministry and the two ports’ workers committees got underway yesterday. Union leaders said they wanted a “safety net” that would ensure salaries and conditions at the state-owned ports after private sector competition begins.

Among other things, the workers committees said they wanted the government to guarantee minimal operational levels at the ports in order to ensure dock workers get their full quota of overtime pay.

The antitrust authority’s position was contained in a letter from legal counsel Uri Schwartz sent two weeks ago to the finance and transportation ministries. In it, Schwartz instructed the ministries to refrain from negotiating with one port in the presence of either management or union representatives from the other.

In the event negotiations do unfold in the presence of representatives of both ports, government representatives were instructed to either halt the proceedings or to ask the representatives of one of the ports to leave the room.

Due to the different conditions being demanded by the two state-owned ports as part of the reform, separate negotiations present the government with the option of signing vastly different agreements. For example, the Ashdod Port union supports privatization of the state-owned ports, while the Haifa Port union is opposed.

The treasury has made clear in recent discussions that it would no longer discuss certain topics already mentioned in talks, following instructions from the antitrust authority.

However, as of yet, it has not asked representatives of the state-owned ports to leave the negotiations themselves.

Click the alert icon to follow topics:



Automatic approval of subscriber comments.

Subscribe today and save 40%

Already signed up? LOG IN


Trump and Netanyahu at the White House in Washington, in 2020.

Three Years Later, Israelis Find Out What Trump Really Thought of Netanyahu

German soldier.

The Rival Jewish Spies Who Almost Changed the Course of WWII

Rio. Not all Jewish men wear black hats.

What Does a Jew Look Like? The Brits Don't Seem to Know

Galon. “I’m coming to accomplish a specific mission: to increase Meretz’s strength and ensure that the party will not tread water around the electoral threshold. If Meretz will be large enough, it will be the basis for a Jewish-Arab partnership.” Daniel Tchetchik

'I Have No Illusions About Ending the Occupation, but the Government Needs the Left'

Soldiers using warfare devices made by the Israeli defense electronics company Elbit Systems.

Russia-Ukraine War Catapults Israeli Arms Industry to Global Stage

Flame and smoke rise during an Israeli air strike, amid Israel-Gaza fighting, in Gaza City August 6, 2022.

Israel Should End Gaza Operation Now, if It Can