Israel Expands Attorney General's Authority Ahead of Possible International War Crimes Case

Updated guideline intended to bolster argument that Israeli investigations meet international standards

Yaniv Kubovich
Yaniv Kubovich
Send in e-mailSend in e-mail
Demonstrators carry banners outside the International Criminal Court, urging the court to prosecute Israel's army for war crimes, in The Hague, Netherlands, Nov. 29, 2019.
Demonstrators carry banners outside the International Criminal Court, urging the court to prosecute Israel's army for war crimes, in The Hague, Netherlands, Nov. 29, 2019. Credit: Peter Dejong,AP
Yaniv Kubovich
Yaniv Kubovich

The Justice Ministry and the Israeli military expanded the attorney general's authority to overturn the military advocate general's decisions last year, a move that would help the government contend with possible prosecutions by the International Criminal Court.

This change allows the attorney general to examine more appeals against the military advocate general's decisions not to criminally investigate complaints alleging a violation of the international rules of war.

Listen: Under Trump, haters don't need an excuse to attack Jews. Ep. 55

The original guideline from 2015 allowed the attorney general to overturn the military advocate general’s decisions in cases involving fatalities during military operations. The more recent change, enacted in May 2019, allows him to also deal with cases involving serious injuries, with cases of “special public importance,” or with cases in which there is damage to protected civilian sites such as hospitals, mosques or humanitarian institutions. The investigation of such incidents will be permitted even if they occur during routine military operations, if there are claims that these have seriously violated customary international law.

The attorney general’s guideline was published as part of the implementation of recommendations by the Turkel Commission, which investigated the incident in 2010 in which Israeli commandos stormed an aid flotilla bound for Gaza. The Commission dealt with the military advocate general's independent legal status and sought to regulate the relationship between the military and civilian legal systems. In 2016 a guideline was added on the possibility of questioning the military advocate general’s decisions, which established that complaints about military operations can be submitted to the attorney general if the army decides not to investigate an alleged violation of the rules of war. This addition came at the recommendation of a team charged with implementing the Turkel Commission's recommendations. These recommendations were approved by the security cabinet.

Palestinians walk during the sunset between the rubble of their destroyed building in Shijaiyah neighborhood of Gaza City, October 12, 2014Credit: Adel Hana / AP

Legal sources told Haaretz that the guideline's update will bolster the government's claims that investigations in Israel meet international standards. They added that it will allow Israel to contest the authority of the ICC to investigate events that occurred during Operation Protective Edge or the demonstrations along the border with Gaza. These sources also noted that it would strengthen the military advocate general’s standing within the army, giving weight to his decisions relating to senior officers whose conduct he has to investigate. Last month, Attorney General Avichai Mendelblit said that the international court has no authority in the West Bank and Gaza, after the ICC’s prosecutor announced that she would start investigating Israel’s operations in the Palestinian territories.

The Justice Ministry commented: “Updating the guidelines came in the wake of two comments made in the state comptroller’s report on the international legal implications of Operation Protective Edge. The report also dealt with the implementation of the Turkel Commission’s recommendations. That decision and guideline 9.1002 were meant to bolster two important pillars referred to by the Turkel Commission: bolstering the independent legal standing of the military advocate general within the military system, and the effective monitoring by civilian echelons of the military, in appropriate cases.”

Click the alert icon to follow topics:

Comments

SUBSCRIBERS JOIN THE CONVERSATION FASTER

Automatic approval of subscriber comments.
From $1 for the first month

SUBSCRIBE
Already signed up? LOG IN

ICYMI

Charles Lindbergh addressing an America First Committee rally on October 3, 1941.

Ken Burns’ Brilliant ‘The U.S. and the Holocaust’ Has Only One Problem

The projected rise in sea level on a beach in Haifa over the next 30 years.

Facing Rapid Rise in Sea Levels, Israel Could Lose Large Parts of Its Coastline by 2050

Tal Dilian.

As Israel Reins in Its Cyberarms Industry, an Ex-intel Officer Is Building a New Empire

Queen Elizabeth II, King Charles III and a British synagogue.

How the Queen’s Death Changes British Jewry’s Most Distinctive Prayer

Newly appointed Israeli ambassador to Chile, Gil Artzyeli, poses for a group picture alongside Rabbi Yonatan Szewkis, Chilean deputy Helia Molina and Gerardo Gorodischer, during a religious ceremony in a synagogue in Vina del Mar, Chile last week.

Chile Community Leaders 'Horrified' by Treatment of Israeli Envoy

Queen Elizabeth attends a ceremony at Windsor Castle, in June 2021.

Over 120 Countries, but Never Israel: Queen Elizabeth II's Unofficial Boycott