The interior of a well house in the Neveh Sha'anan neighborhood of south Tel Aviv. Eyal Toueg

For Arabs, Plans for Jaffa's Preservation Mean Expulsion Through Gentrification

A conservation program to preserve the historic well houses of Jaffa and south Tel Aviv threatens to push Arabs out of the area, argue its critics.

“The good thing about Jaffa is not the city itself, but the gardens that surround it in a 6-kilometer [3.7 mile] semicircle,” enthused Russian pilgrim Sergei Khotorovo in 1895. “I think there are few gardens as splendid as these anywhere in the world.”

Khotorovo was quoted in a comprehensive survey conducted for the Tel Aviv-Jaffa Municipality recently, studying the remnants of the old well houses – buildings erected around water wells, especially near orange groves – that may still be found in Jaffa and south Tel Aviv.

The well houses began appearing in the mid-19th century, typically on high ground in the area around Old Jaffa. They were built by wealthy residents, Christian churches and Jewish pioneers, often expanding into elaborate enclosures with a house (some almost palaces), an orange grove, farm buildings, the well structure, a collecting pool, a water channel and a pump system.

Numerous plans for the preservation of well houses and their original enclosures have been on the drawing boards of Israeli architects in recent times. Although the initiative is dedicated to the preservation of historic buildings that were neglected over the years, it creates some problematic patterns: an increase in the cost of housing and significant social changes in Jaffa; the influx of a new, well-heeled populace; and changes in the designation of buildings from residential to public or commercial, and earmarked in particular for the Jewish sector (the percentage of Arabs living in Jaffa is about 30 percent).

All this, though, is just part of a long process of demolition and the erasure of the urban character, landscape and greenery of Jaffa, which began after the establishment of the state in 1948.

Eyal Toueg

“The plans to ‘Judaize’ Jaffa are intended to prepare the way for the rich,” says Umar al-Ghubari of Zochrot, an organization that is focused on promoting the “acknowledgement” of Jewish Israelis of their “accountability for the ongoing injustices of the Nakba, the Palestinian catastrophe of 1948,” and the “reconceptualization of the Return” of Palestine refugees to the country.

“They are not only destroying the area but the identity of the place as well,” says Ghubari. “The new plans are grandiose and will only let wealthy people live in the city. They use old Arab houses in a modern way, and create the optical illusion that there are cultures here that follow each other – while actually the new thing completely hides the violence the state used.”

The first erosion of the orange groves occurred during World War I. A further reduction is evident from aerial photographs in 1944, when groves were replaced by new Jewish neighborhoods or the expansion of existing ones. The situation of the remaining orange groves deteriorated in the 1950s, when their Arab owners moved away or were evicted.

The state previously used violent means to evict the Arab community, as in the demolition of the Manshiyya neighborhood in southwestern Tel Aviv (now the site of Charles Clore Park), says Ghubari. But today the approach is ostensibly “clean,” he says: “You don’t see firearms and blood, but they use nice, pretty scientific methods. I have no objection to beautiful places, but it’s an attempt to disguise the violence that took place here and to present it as a development.” He sees it as plain and simple discrimination against the Arab community.

Sami Abu Shehadeh, a former member of the city council, has a PhD in history from Tel Aviv University and is equally critical of the gentrification process in Jaffa. He alleges that the conservation of the well houses is a “concept of preservation that emerged after the government had been destroying for 40 years and there was nothing left to preserve. Israeli architects felt they were behind the times compared to other countries, and began to invent a Palestinian past that would fit their goal. What’s infuriating about this concept is that people are secondary, and therefore the conservation efforts become part of the [process of] erasure. Anyone who really wants to preserve history would also preserve the context. I once met with the designers of one of the plans and asked them whether they had conducted a social survey. They didn’t understand the question at all. They plan clean neighborhoods and never visualize people.”

Eyal Toueg

As for what should be done, Abu Shehadeh proposes turning some of the old buildings “into museums of historic Jaffa. Architecturally, I would create distance between these buildings and anything big, without factoring in for whom they are intended. I would give them space rather than suffocate them with adjacent skyscrapers.”

Historic and contemporary

The areas earmarked for preservation can be roughly divided into three groups:

1. Areas of just a few dunams, containing a small number of historic buildings with space around them for relatively low-rise construction;

2. Areas with different land values within the same area, creating a tense relationship between historic and new buildings;

Eyal Toueg

3. Very large areas designated for hundreds, or even thousands, of housing units, including the eviction of residents who are defined as “trespassers.” In such an area, the well houses will be mere landmarks, with some even threatened by demolition.

The well houses that have survived don’t include the old orange grove spaces, but merely the buildings; some still have a well. In the vast majority of cases, the residents are not descendents of the original owners. Most of the well houses and adjacent enclosures belong to numerous owners; many are owned jointly by the Israel Land Authority and a public body like the Amidar Public Housing Authority or the local municipality. And, of course, some are in private hands.

Iris Kashman teaches conservation at the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, and has studied the well houses in Jaffa. She says that as property developers eye Jaffa and south Tel Aviv, the historic buildings are seen as some kind of bonus. They “shouldn’t be regarded for [their] real estate potential, or as an [Arab] place that allows maximization of building rights, but for creating a fabric that allows for interaction with memories on a daily basis.”

Kashman believes the plans do not create a fabric that would ensure a mixed population, but instead an extreme jumble of historic and contemporary buildings.

The turning point in understanding the importance of well houses only began in the aughts. Naor Mimar, who grew up in Jaffa, was a young architect in the office of conservation architect Amnon Bar Or. “I realized the buildings were being destroyed and would disappear entirely. This was the landscape of my childhood,” he says, in the documentation about a well house on Azza Street, Jaffa, which was demolished for no reason.

Matson (G. Eric and Edith) Photograph Collection

In June 2006, Mimar created a presentation that outlined what was happening. “I sent it to everyone I could, but no one responded,” he says. Shortly afterward, Bar Or taught a course at Tel Aviv University – together with Sergio Lerman, where the students were assigned to study dozens of well houses. “In 2009, when Amnon arranged a study day on the subject, everybody came,” relates Mimar. “That was the beginning of a turning point in public opinion, and even the Building Conservation Department began adopting the well houses.”

Mimar is part of a planning team that includes Tal Katzir, and architects Udi Mantsuri and Michael Walma van der Molen. Its goal is to draw up a comprehensive plan for the conservation of the well houses as a feature of the landscape. “One must go a little back in time and a little forward,” says Mimar. “That is the way the plan works. We examine the physical facets and formulate a methodology for environmental conservation and development.”

Not just the White City

Architect Rinat Millo-Steinlauf, who directs preservation efforts in Jaffa and south Tel Aviv on behalf of the municipality’s Building Conservation Department, energetically promotes safeguarding the well houses. “The goal is to preserve this local agricultural-architectural legacy as a regional feature, as a network of connected points,” she says. “This network is intended to create cultural ‘anchors’ that will influence the immediate surroundings, like islands in a lake.”

Millo-Steinlauf notes that the municipality’s strategy has changed in recent years. “We’re studying newer buildings built in the 1950s and ’60s, and not just the International Style [from the 1930s Bauhaus period] and the eclectic building of the 1920s. However, the new plans will take us back to earlier periods.” Millo-Steinlauf says the new plans intend to preserve 45 well houses, including those that have already been earmarked for conservation.

Eyal Toueg

A relatively successful example of conservation was carried out at the Noya residential complex on Salameh Road (on the seam between Tel Aviv and Jaffa), which is now nearing completion. The project was designed by architect Avner Yashar. His colleague, Eyal Ziv, was responsible for the conservation aspect, which included a historic enclosure made up of a collecting pool, storehouses and a well house that belonged to the well-known Murad family. The historic buildings and outer wall have been left where they were, facing the street, while the new residential buildings were erected behind them.

The Tel Aviv-Jaffa Municipality was asked how the residents of Jaffa were being taken into account in the new plans for south Tel Aviv, and to describe its planning vision for Jaffa. “The municipality believes that Jaffa is an integral part of the city of Tel Aviv-Jaffa, and consequently gives it top urban priority,” it responded. “The overall planning policy regards Jaffa as a particularly sensitive part of the urban fabric, and strives for a balance between the desire to preserve the character of the buildings and the special aspects of the landscape, the continued development of Jaffa as a center of the city’s tourism and commerce, and the strengthening of the bond between Jaffa and the rest of the city.

“To realize that aspiration, the municipality has invested over a billion shekels [$260 million] in the last decade for the development of Jaffa. Projects include the development of Jaffa Port, the creation of the Midron Yafo Park, the establishment of the Academic College campus, a special project to create affordable housing for the Arab community, and more. Apart from investment in infrastructure and planning, the municipality invests in welfare and education in the Jaffa community, with the goal of improving the quality of life for the residents.”

skip all comments


Sign in to join the conversation.

Required field
Required field

By adding a comment, I agree to this site’s Terms of use

  1. 1