U.S. President Barack Obama knows that expanding his military operation against Islamic State militants from Iraq to Syria is a gamble, but one the United States is willing to take.
- WATCH: ISIS wants to take over the world, says ex-Pentagon adviser
- WATCH: U.S. must eviscerate ISIS, like Al-Qaida, says ex-Pentagon adviser
- WATCH: Is the Gaza war really over?
- WATCH: U.S., Iran may collaborate secretly on ISIS, analyst says
- Islamic State recruits female jihadis in U.S. heartland
- WATCH: 'Look who's hawking.' Jon Stewart taunts Obama's new war posture
- Report: U.S. providing Assad regime with anti-Islamic State intelligence
- Some more willing than others in coalition against Islamic State
- U.S. House to debate arming, training anti-Islamic State rebels in Syria
- Report: Al-Qaida asked Islamic State to release U.K. charity worker Henning
- Islamic State responds to Obama with Hollywood-style video
- Obama: U.S. intel underestimated Islamic State menace in Syria
That according to Dr. Gary Ackerman, director of the Special Projects Division at START, the largest terrorism research center in the world.
In an interview with Aimee Amiga for Haaretz.com, Ackerman said the moderate rebels of today can become the extremists of tomorrow and, as such, arming them to support their fight against Islamic State could backfire. However, he said, the White House believes it now knows how to differentiate between "good rebels" and "bad rebels," and will empower them with the hope that the situation in Syria does not turn into another Afghanistan, where the United States armed what was to become Al-Qaida.
In their interview, Amiga and Ackerman also looked at whether the United States' fight against extremist rebels would in effect turn Obama into Syrian President Bashar Assad's ally, and whether U.S. airstrikes in Syria would be considered a violation of the latter's sovereignty under international law.
Click here for Part Two of this interview, "U.S., Iran May Collaborate Secretly on ISIS, Analyst Says."