A district court refused on Monday to vacate the conviction of the Dawabsheh family’s murderer due to contradictions between the indictment and interviews later given by the family’s sole survivor.
The Dawabsheh family’s home in the West Bank village of Duma was torched in July 2015. The parents and the younger child all died in the fire; only the older boy, Ahmed Dawabsheh, survived.
Amiram Ben-Uliel was convicted of the murder earlier this year and is due to be sentenced next Monday. A minor who was convicted as an accomplice will be sentenced on Wednesday.
In its ruling, the Central District Court said that since Ahmed Dawabsheh, now 10, was only five at the time of the murder, it’s impossible to know what in the interviews was based on reliable memory and what was based on stories he heard later.
It’s clear he believes what he said, the judges added, but that doesn’t mean it can be treated as fact. Moreover, they noted, his story is inconsistent both internally and with the forensic evidence collected at the scene.
Ben-Uliel’s attorneys, Asher Ohayon and Itzhak Bam, had asked in June that Dawabsheh be summoned to testify in court before the sentence was handed down, in light of two interviews he had given – one to the daily Yedioth Ahronoth and one together with his grandfather to a radio station. Police had never questioned Dawabsheh, but in both interviews, he said he remembered the incident very well.
The attorneys argued that the contradictions between the indictment and those interviews created sufficient doubt to justify acquitting Ben-Uliel. For instance, Dawabsheh said that three settlers participated in the arson attack, whereas the indictment said Ben-Uliel torched the house by himself.
- Sentencing of Israeli arsonist who killed Palestinian family delayed over survivor's interview
- Family of Duma arson attack victims to testify ahead of murderer sentencing
- Who is Amiram Ben-Uliel, the killer of the Dawabsheh family?
The court decided against asking Dawabsheh to testify, fearing it would be a traumatic experience for a 10-year-old boy. Instead, the prosecution and defense agreed that the interviews he gave would be admitted as evidence. The prosecution also found and submitted two reports in Al Jazeera.
Ohayon said the court’s refusal to overturn Ben-Uliel’s conviction was “a mistake that we hope and expect to overturn on appeal.” The verdict, he added, is “full of question marks.”
Attorney Omar Khamaisi, representing the Dawabsheh family, said he wasn’t surprised by the decision. “All this drama is a pity when there’s so much evidence indicating who did this,” he said. “And we now know for certain that the person who committed this abhorrent crime is Amiram Ben-Uliel.”