This could only happen in Israel: a porcupine digging a burrow unearthed a perfect 1,400-year old oil lamp – only to have its prize seized by "archaeology cops" on a routine patrol to frustrate robbers.
- Lovelorn porcupine breaks into Safari park in central Israel
- Seeds of lost Byzantine-era Gaza wine found in Negev
- Archaeological discoveries at Magdala show: Christians and Jews are coming full circle
- Fragile historical discovery: Ancient glass bracelet with menorah motif
- Injured Israeli swift gets feather transplant from German bird
- Israel to display oldest known copy of Ten Commandments
- New archaeological finds challenge ideas of prehistoric Israel
Specifically, Israel Antiquities Authority inspectors were on their routine rounds to thwart thievery from archaeological sites, which is about as common as the artifacts themselves in the Middle East. During their visit to Horbat Siv, a site from the late Roman-Byzantine period in the Sharon area, central Israel, they noticed a remarkably well-preserved lamp lying on the rim of a porcupine burrow. The lamp had burn marks, indicating that it had once been in use
When burrowing, porcupines throw discarded dirt – and pesky ancient treasures in its way – surfaceward.
It bears noting that as rodents go, porcupines are large, weighing up to 15 kilograms, and they need big burrows that can easily stretch more than 15 meters.
The upshot, explains Ira Horowitz of the anti-theft unit at the IAA, is that "porcupine archaeology" isn't as rare as one might assume. Nor is rodent disruption of the archaeological record: Researchers have long lamented the way gophers mess up the archaeological record in North America, not least by mixing up the soil layers.
So, when finding archaeological remains in porcupine dirt piles in Israel, all the human archaeologists can do is try to collect the artifacts by the order in which they are found – an artifact at the top of the pile would have been the most recently found, by the porcupine that is; now all the archaeologists have to do is see what historical layer the rodent had most recently been digging through. It's elementary, if not entirely reliable.