Decision Due on Bill Allowing Force-feeding of Hunger Strikers

The bill was drawn up following extensive hunger strikes by Palestinians that took place in 2012.

Jonathan Lis
Jonathan Lis
Send in e-mailSend in e-mail
Palestinians celebrate the deal ending the prisoners' hunger strike in Ramallah.
Palestinians celebrate the deal ending the prisoners' hunger strike in Ramallah.Credit: AP
Jonathan Lis
Jonathan Lis

The Ministerial Committee for Legislation was set to decide on Sunday on a bill enabling doctors to treat prisoners on hunger strike despite their objections, in essence allowing the force-feeding of such prisoners.

According to the proposal, authored by the Ministry for Public Security, district courts will be charged with authorizing Prison Services doctors to treat prisoners against their will. “A decision on this sensitive question, which requires a careful balancing of weighty and diverse factors, should not be taken by administrative or medical officials responsible for the wellbeing of a prisoner on hunger strike, but should rather be made by a court of law at the appropriate level.”

Under the bill, the court would be asked to approve such a procedure only after being convinced that all measures to reach an understanding with the prisoner had been taken, and that significant attempts were made to convince him to accept treatment.

Giving medical treatment to a hunger striker against his will raises ethical questions for doctors. “There is no disputing the claim that a doctor, based on his training and on the essence of his profession, is bound to do everything possible to ease the suffering and give medical assistance to people in his care,” according to a memo attached to the bill.

However, it adds that “there are situations in which the person being treated does not cooperate, for whatever reason, with the treatment being offered, and even forcibly objects to receiving it or to the conducting of relevant tests. This poses a serious dilemma for the treating doctor, since on one hand he is responsible for the person’s wellbeing, with the ability to assist or even save his life. On the other hand he needs to respect the subject’s autonomy, accepting his right to make his own decisions regarding his life and health.”

The bill was drawn up following extensive hunger strikes that took place in security prisons in 2012. In contrast to earlier hunger strikes, large numbers of prisoners participated, some of whom put their lives at risk.

Click the alert icon to follow topics:

Comments

SUBSCRIBERS JOIN THE CONVERSATION FASTER

Automatic approval of subscriber comments.
From $1 for the first month

Already signed up? LOG IN

ICYMI

Charles Lindbergh addressing an America First Committee rally on October 3, 1941.

Ken Burns’ Brilliant ‘The U.S. and the Holocaust’ Has Only One Problem

The projected rise in sea level on a beach in Haifa over the next 30 years.

Facing Rapid Rise in Sea Levels, Israel Could Lose Large Parts of Its Coastline by 2050

Tal Dilian.

As Israel Reins in Its Cyberarms Industry, an Ex-intel Officer Is Building a New Empire

Queen Elizabeth II, King Charles III and a British synagogue.

How the Queen’s Death Changes British Jewry’s Most Distinctive Prayer

Newly appointed Israeli ambassador to Chile, Gil Artzyeli, poses for a group picture alongside Rabbi Yonatan Szewkis, Chilean deputy Helia Molina and Gerardo Gorodischer, during a religious ceremony in a synagogue in Vina del Mar, Chile last week.

Chile Community Leaders 'Horrified' by Treatment of Israeli Envoy

Queen Elizabeth attends a ceremony at Windsor Castle, in June 2021.

Over 120 Countries, but Never Israel: Queen Elizabeth II's Unofficial Boycott