Secrets From File of Arab-killer Natan-Zada: Prosecutors Refused to Call Him a Terrorist

Haifa court acquits seven Israeli Arabs of attempted murder in the lynching of Natan-Zada.

Revital Hovel
Revital Hovel
Send in e-mailSend in e-mail
Revital Hovel
Revital Hovel

The State Prosecutor’s Office refused to call Eden Natan-Zada, who killed four people in a shooting spree in Shfaram in August 2005, a terrorist. The prosecution said it did not want to “defame the dead,” reveals a document relating to the exchange between prosecutors and defense attorneys of seven people accused of attempted murder for attacking Natan-Zada, who was lynched by a crowd after he opened fire in the bus.

A Haifa court on Monday acquitted seven Israeli Arabs of attempted murder in the lynching of Natan-Zada, but convicted four of them of attempted homicide and two more of aggravated assault. The court convicted all seven defendants of aggravated assault of police officers, obstruction of justice, and property damage due to rioting.

Natan-Zada, a deserter from the IDF, was believed to have committed the murders in protest against Israel’s disengagement from Gaza, which was taking place at the time. He opened fire on passengers en route to Shfaram from Haifa using his army-issued rifle. He killed the bus driver, Michel Bahus, and three passengers, Nader Hayek and two sisters, Hazar Turki and Dina Turki, and wounded 20 others.

After the indictments were filed against the seven defendants four years ago, the judges in the case recommended to both sides that they reach a plea bargain. The case was passed over to a mediator, but in August 2010 when the defense attorneys met with prosecutors, the negotiations blew up - even before the two sides discussed a deal. Instead they argued about changes the defense attorneys wanted made in the statement of facts in the indictment.

Defense attorneys wanted to add the description “terrorist” to Natan-Zada’s name in the indictment in a number of places, and have it say he acted out of “nationalistic motives.”

The prosecution refused to have Natan-Zada refeerred to as a terrorist, and the defense attorneys documented the meeting and kept a record for themselves. Nonetheless, the two sides ended up reaching a plea bargain, though it was never completed.

Despite the prosecution’s refusal, at the time of the shooting, then Prime Minister Ariel Sharon called Natan-Zada’s actions an “act of terror,” and the victim’s families were recognized as being the victims of hostile acts. The judge in the case also described Natan-Zada’s actions as terror n every way.

Eden Natan-Zada.

Comments

SUBSCRIBERS JOIN THE CONVERSATION FASTER

Automatic approval of subscriber comments.

Subscribe today and save 40%

Already signed up? LOG IN

ICYMI

Palestinians search through the rubble of a building in which Khaled Mansour, a top Islamic Jihad militant was killed following an Israeli airstrike in Rafah, southern Gaza strip, on Sunday.

Gazans Are Tired of Pointless Wars and Destruction, and Hamas Listens to Them

Trump and Netanyahu at the White House in Washington, in 2020.

Three Years Later, Israelis Find Out What Trump Really Thought of Netanyahu

German soldier.

The Rival Jewish Spies Who Almost Changed the Course of WWII

Rio. Not all Jewish men wear black hats.

What Does a Jew Look Like? The Brits Don't Seem to Know

Galon. “I’m coming to accomplish a specific mission: to increase Meretz’s strength and ensure that the party will not tread water around the electoral threshold. If Meretz will be large enough, it will be the basis for a Jewish-Arab partnership.” Daniel Tchetchik

'I Have No Illusions About Ending the Occupation, but the Government Needs the Left'

Soldiers using warfare devices made by the Israeli defense electronics company Elbit Systems.

Russia-Ukraine War Catapults Israeli Arms Industry to Global Stage