U.S. War Game Predicts Israeli Strike on Iran Will Result in Regional War, Hundreds of Americans Dead

New York Times report says war simulation has raised fears among top American officials that it may be impossible to prevent American involvement in any escalating confrontation with Iran.

Send in e-mailSend in e-mail
Send in e-mailSend in e-mail

A classified war simulation exercise held earlier this month by the United States estimated that a strike on Iran would lead to a regional war which could draw in the United States and leave hundreds of Americans dead, a New York Times report revealed on Monday night.

According to the report, top American officials said the so-called war game was not designed as a rehearsal for American military action, and emphasized that the results were not the only possible outcome of a potential conflict.

What are your thoughts on this issue? Follow Haaretz.com on Facebook and share your views

However, the report also stated that the simulation has raised fears among top American planners that it may be impossible to prevent American involvement in any escalating confrontation with Iran, the officials said.

The New York Times report further revealed that the results of the war game were especially troubling to General James N. Mattis, who commands American forces in the Middle East, Persian Gulf and Southwest Asia, and who told aides, upon the conclusion of the exercise, that an Israeli first-strike could have dire consequences for the region and for United States forces stationed there.

According to the report, the two-week war game, played out a potential narrative in which the United States found itself pulled into the conflict after Iranian missiles struck a Navy warship in the Persian Gulf, killing about 200 Americans, said officials with knowledge of the exercise. The United States then responded by launching its own strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities.

The initial Israeli attack was assessed to have set back the Iranian nuclear program by roughly a year, and the subsequent American strikes were not able to slow the Iranian nuclear program by more than an additional two years, the report said.

However, the report also stated that Pentagon officials have said that America’s arsenal of long-range bombers, refueling aircraft and precision missiles could do far more damage to the Iranian nuclear program should President Obama were to decide on a full-scale retaliation.

In the end, the report states, the war game reinforced to the unpredictable nature of a strike by Israel, as well as a counterstrike by Iran, the officials said.

According to the New York Times, the war game, called “Internal Look,” has been one of Central Command’s most significant planning exercises, and is carried out about twice a year to assess how the headquarters, its staff and command posts in the region would respond to various real-world situations.

Read this article in Hebrew



Automatic approval of subscriber comments.
From $1 for the first month

Already signed up? LOG IN


Charles Lindbergh addressing an America First Committee rally on October 3, 1941.

Ken Burns’ Brilliant ‘The U.S. and the Holocaust’ Has Only One Problem

The projected rise in sea level on a beach in Haifa over the next 30 years.

Facing Rapid Rise in Sea Levels, Israel Could Lose Large Parts of Its Coastline by 2050

Prime Minister Yair Lapid, this month.

Lapid to Haaretz: ‘I Have Learned to Respect the Left’

“Dubi,” whose full name is secret in keeping with instructions from the Mossad.

The Mossad’s Fateful 48 Hours Before the Yom Kippur War

Tal Dilian.

As Israel Reins in Its Cyberarms Industry, an Ex-intel Officer Is Building a New Empire

Queen Elizabeth II, King Charles III and a British synagogue.

How the Queen’s Death Changes British Jewry’s Most Distinctive Prayer