Tom Segev Demjanjuk's Five-year Sentence Isn't Worthy of Praise

Demjanjuk sentenced to five years imprisonment, meaning he will serve exactly one hour, 31 minutes for his part in the murder of each of the 28,060 Sobibor prisoners.

Tom Segev
Tom Segev
Send in e-mailSend in e-mail
Tom Segev
Tom Segev

Theres something grotesque about sentencing a 91-year-old man like John Demjanjuk to a life sentence, but at least a life sentence would have served to highlight the moral and educational value of his conviction.

Instead, Demjanjuk was sentenced to five years imprisonment. Thats even more grotesque, because a simple calculation shows that he will serve exactly one hour and 31 minutes for his part in the murder of each of the 28,060 Sobibor prisoners.

John Demjanjuk arriving at the courtroom on May 11, 2011 in Munich, the day before he was convicted of helping to murder 27,900 Jews and others while he guarded the Sobibor Nazi death camp.Credit: AFP

The sentence issued by the Munich court is the latest in a long and disgraceful line of non-punishments meted out to war criminals in Germany. Since the end of World War II, no more than 6,500 Nazi war criminals have been convicted there, only a few of them for their roles in murdering Jews. Most of them were given relatively short sentences, and many of them didnt even serve out those.

Thus, the German judicial system doesnt deserve high praise for seeing justice done, in contrast to Israels Supreme Court, which was widely praised for acquitting Demjanjuk of being Ivan the Terrible based on the existance of a reasonable doubt.

But the Munich courts decision did seemingly justify what former Supreme Court president Aharon Barak said years after he helped acquit Demjanjuk: If Demjanjuk was not Ivan the Terrible, then he was Ivan the not-so-terrible. He was there, he participated in the destruction.

The court in Munich also determined that it was authorized to try Demjanjuk, even though neither he nor his victims were German citizens. There is universal importance to this decision, which is similar to the Israeli determination that it had the right to try Adolf Eichmann, even though Israel did not exist during the Holocaust era.

These decisions demonstrate the potential deterrence value of these trials: Their role is to illustrate to every young person in uniform that in all places, and under all circumstances, there are patently illegal orders that must not be obeyed, as Israeli law also asserts.

All who are accessories to war crimes must know that someday they are likely to find themselves in court and be forced to account for their crimes. And this will be so, even in a new world, whose values are different than the ones they knew, even in a country that was never theirs, even after seven decades.

Thus, trying Demjanjuk was indeed justified, not despite his advanced age, but because of it.

Comments

SUBSCRIBERS JOIN THE CONVERSATION FASTER

Automatic approval of subscriber comments.
From $1 for the first month

Already signed up? LOG IN

ICYMI

Charles Lindbergh addressing an America First Committee rally on October 3, 1941.

Ken Burns’ Brilliant ‘The U.S. and the Holocaust’ Has Only One Problem

The projected rise in sea level on a beach in Haifa over the next 30 years.

Facing Rapid Rise in Sea Levels, Israel Could Lose Large Parts of Its Coastline by 2050

Tal Dilian.

As Israel Reins in Its Cyberarms Industry, an Ex-intel Officer Is Building a New Empire

Queen Elizabeth II, King Charles III and a British synagogue.

How the Queen’s Death Changes British Jewry’s Most Distinctive Prayer

Newly appointed Israeli ambassador to Chile, Gil Artzyeli, poses for a group picture alongside Rabbi Yonatan Szewkis, Chilean deputy Helia Molina and Gerardo Gorodischer, during a religious ceremony in a synagogue in Vina del Mar, Chile last week.

Chile Community Leaders 'Horrified' by Treatment of Israeli Envoy

Queen Elizabeth attends a ceremony at Windsor Castle, in June 2021.

Over 120 Countries, but Never Israel: Queen Elizabeth II's Unofficial Boycott