A valuable companion in the biblical wilderness
Frankel's unique book helps correct an injustice, by liberating the female voices that have been suffocated in traditional Jewish discourse
By Zvia Walden"The Five Books of Miriam: A Woman's Commentary on the Torah," by Ellen Frankel, HarperOne, $13 (translated into Hebrew as "Midrash Miriam" by Azzan Yadin, Am Oved, 372 pages, NIS 89)
This is a unique book, representing an entirely new genre. It is unique and impressive because, to the best of my knowledge, it is the first book to offer a midrashic interpretation of the Pentateuch - following the order of the parashot (weekly readings) - written by a woman. It is also unique and surprising because sometimes its tone resembles a soap opera, and sometimes an ordinary conversation.
Dr. Ellen Frankel is the chief executive officer and editor in chief of the Jewish Publication Society (JPS), the most important Jewish publishing house in the United States. She chose to explicate the Pentateuch through the voices of 18 women and another representative 20 voices, which make what could be called guest appearances. Every Sabbath, she enables the previously missing voices of women from various generations to be heard. The multi-voiced nature of this one-of-a-kind work and genre is also multidisciplinary and multi-generational.
Traditional Jewish discourse is rich, daring and fascinating. The Pentateuch derives its strength not just from the original text's conciseness and drama, but also from the endless exchange of views between scholars, artists, authors and poets. The many layers that have been written about and around the Pentateuch - the Mishnah, the Babylonian and Jerusalem Talmuds, and the midrashim - are a large, blue sea, which is sometimes placid, sometimes stormy, but which always aspires to a distant horizon.
However, despite all its abundance and its continually renewing flow, traditional Jewish discourse is also partial because, over the generations, its exclusive creators have been males. Among the injustices our generation must correct is the liberation of the voices that have been suffocated in that discourse. In recent years, a mighty project has been underway: Women are rescuing female voices from canonic sources and breathing new life into them because, ever since the Torah was given to us at Mount Sinai - when "the voice emerged, becoming 70 tongues" (Exodus Rabbah, section 5, subsection 9) - some of those voices have vanished. By seeing how Frankel chose her voices and how she presents them, we can understand this book's uniqueness.
The first voice in "The Five Books of Miriam" is that of the Torah itself, through which the author offers an abstract of each weekly reading. The next three voices are those of our daughters, mothers and grandmothers, and their voices deepen the intergenerational dialogue. No easy task, because the changes that have occurred in the status of women in the past century raise many difficult questions. The fifth and sixth voices are not those of women, rather they belong to the classic rabbinical authorities and to modern Jewish studies; they are intended to place things in a contemporary context that does not ignore what was written previously - whether in Orthodox or academic discourse - but which is interwoven with it. Nine additional speakers are presented, each with a unique epithet: "Lilith the rebel," "Sarah the ancient one," "Hagar the stranger," "Wily Rebecca, granddaughter of Milcah," "Leah the namer," "Dinah the wounded one, daughter of Leah and Jacob," "Serach bat Asher the historian, granddaughter of Zilpah," "Esther the hidden one," and "Bruria the scholar."
This is undoubtedly a selection that is daring in terms of its composition and which is also innovative because many of the women referred to in the Torah are not identified by name. The injustice committed against additional voices making a guest appearance in this midrash has been partially corrected - in other words, they have been given a first name - by the classic rabbinical authorities. Thus, we are introduced to Amitlai, Abraham's mother; Na'ama, Noah's wife; "Edith, the one-who-looks-back," Lot's wife; "Lusty Zuleika," Potiphar's wife; Princess Thermutis, Pharaoh's daughter; and "She'ilah, the one-who-is-demanded," Jephthah's daughter. Another unique voice is added to this group: "Hannah Rachel, the maid of Ludomir: The only female Hasidic rebbe, who wore tallit and tefillin ..." (Rabbi Dr. Moshe Zemer would dispute the idea of her having been the first woman to serve as her community's rabbi prior to this century).
Feminist companions
What is unique about "The Five Books of Miriam" is not just the fact that it was written by a woman. We have already been privileged to read the series of feminist companions to biblical works offered by Athalya Brenner ("A Feminist Companion to ..."). Marcia Falk provides a brilliant treatment of Jewish liturgy in her "The Book of Blessings" (1999); she has also created a moving English version of the Song of Songs. We have derived boundless enjoyment from Ruth Calderon's collection of midrashic legends, "Hashuk, habayit, halev" ("The Market, the Home, the Heart," 2004, in Hebrew) and we have sampled the mystical experience provided in the Zohar, the central medieval Jewish mystical text, thanks to Dr. Melila Hellner-Eshed in "V'nahar yatza me eden" ("A River Issues Forth from Eden: On the Language of Mystical Experience in the Zohar" (2005, in Hebrew). We have prayed with Rabbi Tamar Duvdevani, a prolific thinker; and we await the publication of her writings, although a welcome hint has already appeared: "El halev" ("Straight to the Heart," 2005 in Hebrew; edited by Rabbi Ofer Shabbat-Beit-Halahmi, with an introduction by Rabbi Dalia Marx).
Furthermore, we have witnessed the transformation of a collection of prayers written by women - unfortunately, only Orthodox women - into a best-seller: "Tfilat nashim" ("Jewish Women's Prayers Throughout the Ages," 2005, in Hebrew), tastefully edited by Aliza Lavie. Together with Ruhama Weiss, we have explored the psychological depths of Talmudic stories from a uniquely feminine perspective ("Mithayevet benafshi," 2006; in Hebrew), and I myself was privileged to participate in two collections of women reading the Book of Genesis ("Nashim korot mibereshit," 1999, in Hebrew; edited by Ruth Ravitsky) and "Pirkei avot," Ethics of the Fathers" (in "Perkei emahot," "Sayings of the Mothers," 2002; edited by Yael Mishali). And this is only a partial list.
A "soft," or feminine, reading is not the exclusive province of women, of course; for instance, there is a series (in Hebrew) on the weekly parasha, written by Ari Alon (published by BINA), and a very contemporary, very feminist reading in his book, "Ba el hakodesh" (2005, in Hebrew).
It is somewhat puzzling why the publisher decided to call the book under review here "Midrash Miriam," instead of "Miriam's Pentateuch" or "Miriam's Torah." The attempt to distinguish between peshat (objectively oriented explication) and derash (subjectively oriented explication), or between derash and parshanut (commentary) is no easy matter. In effect, in nearly every case, peshat is very close to derash, although the latter sometimes adopts a more adventurous course. According to Menachem Elon, derash is "careful study and a search for the internal meaning and logic of a given text, when a more superficial reading could lead us to a different conclusion." Thus, "Miriam's Midrash" might actually be doing justice to the nature of this book because it places it in the context of the midrash, which Rotem Wagner has termed "the Jewish people 's most original invention" (in the journal Eretz Aheret from September-December 2006).
Concerning this invention, Edmond Jabes makes the following statement: "First of all, there is the text, which represents the major texts of the tradition. However, these texts have been augmented by commentaries, or the Talmud in its entirety. In these commentaries, the Jew remains quintessentially Jewish, because each text is experienced anew with the presentation of the question and is experienced anew as something that once existed, as if the Jews reading it were standing before something they themselves had written." I would add that, in each generation, every woman should regard herself as if she herself had been there. As Jabes himself says, continuing the above thought, "to question the text means that you are questioning yourself ... Jews read texts, read life, read God, read themselves. It is as if we are receiving letters from someone each day, reading them and writing a reply to the sender. That is Judaism."
In effect, "The Five Books of Miriam" is written like an exchange of correspondence or a series of dialogues. In the book's prologue, there is a beautiful legend from the Tosefta (Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sukkah, ch. 3, section 3) about Miriam's well, which is described as being "like a solid rock" (which is, nonetheless, also like a sieve). As the Israelites wander through the wilderness, the well accompanies them in their journey, it "ascends the hills and descends with the Israelites into the valleys." When the women sing to it, it delivers its water to them, unlike what Moses, Miriam's brother does: He strikes the rock in order to bring forth water. Frankel follows Miriam's example, giving the Five Books of Moses different names, calling Genesis "Individuals and Families"; Exodus "Community"; Leviticus "Ritual"; Numbers "Leadership"; and Deuteronomy "Memory." Furthermore, her midrash revolves around these topics.
Bruria's psyche
For example, in Parashat Mishpatim, she deals with the community's mechanisms for control and presents two stories of seduction. The first is about Bruria. Her husband, Rabbi Meir, sends one of his students to seduce her, "in order to prove that I am no different from any other woman and that, despite my achievements in Jewish scholarship, I am a weak, frivolous creature." (This is how Bruria, as Frankel presents her, describes the incident). In Bruria's time, scholarship was the exclusive province of men and they wanted to perpetuate this situation. The reader soon learns that Rabbi Meir, known for his good looks, falls prey to a similar trap. Frankel tries to get inside Bruria's psyche not only by having her describe the episode in first person, but also by having her render this posthumous statement: "I was so ashamed by my immoral behavior that I hanged myself." After an echo summons Rabbi Meir heavenward, Bruria, sounding like any modern-day woman, declares that they will have much to talk about.
Frankel's book is very important for a contemporary reading of the Torah; captivating and easily accessible, it will appeal to readers who are open-minded and who long for a better understanding of the biblical text. Like Miriam's well, "The Five Books" will be a valuable companion as we wander through the biblical wilderness. Special thanks are due to Am Oved, the publisher of this book, for consistently promoting a rare cultural, intellectual and social horizon: "The Five Books" is part of Am Oved's Jewish Bookshelf series, and men and women will now be able, on a weekly basis, to enjoy together this literary, dramatic text, which so skillfully challenges conventions; to remember voices that have been forgotten or have been forced into oblivion, and to learn that, although the water may sometimes be bitter, it always sustains life. Moreover, we are free to choose when, how much and how to drink it.
Zvia Walden teaches development linguistics at Beit Berl College.
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
Is it just possible you would have been one of those following the 450 false prophets of baal that Elijah ordered to be killed? I think so. Believing the Caananite baal was the same YHWH. This is delusional. What you dont understand is that it is not the Rabbi's who ultimately decide who is Jewish but the One who set the rules for us to be so. Circumcision of the heart is His rule. Of all those in Israel at the time of Elijah, only 7000 were regared Jewish.This is a small percentage. Have the Jewish people not suffered enough because of disregarding His way for mans way. You reject your own prophets and are as stubborn and rebellious as those in the wilderness. The Mighty God of Israel describes those who reject His plan, as revealed by Moshe, as deluded. I pray your blindness is not permanent.
There are, in fact, two uses of the word "torah" in Jewish tradition--the laws and prescriptions found in the chumash/sefer torah (d'oreita) and "torah" in the broadest and most expansive sense of teaching. There is actually good reason (that eludes article author Zvia Walden) for entitling the book "Midrash Miriam"--it is an imaginary intellectual "ushpizin" of women from various stories and settings that is far more midrashic than pentateuchal--women's torah in the broadest sense. It is no substitute for Nechama Leibowitz or Aviva Zornberg, and doesn't try to be. As for anyone who finds Frankel's endeavor offensive, go back to your tomes of Chullin (or, if female, to scrubbing your cholent pot) and don't even try to intelligently discuss what you haven't read, won't read, and/or choose not to understand.
I think 'another jewesss' got us confused. She was talking to you. We were called to be a light unto the goy. You think this is light? This is exactly what Jeremiah calls by way of the LORD, "stupidity". Please tell me how we are to be a light with this nonsence.
your arguments are ancient and have long been disproved. For one thing Rabbinic Decision making goes by the majority of Qualified sages. All Rabbi Akiva's colleagues argued that he was wrong, and that is the only proof that he was.
Ask any psychiatrist what the difference is. Then ask for medication.
Am I wrong in saying Rabbi Akiva said Bar Kochba was the Messiah? These are good credentials to prove people should listen to you? Why not rather listen to and quote one of the many rejected true prophets, like Jeremiah 4:22, (maybe he had Jerusalem syndrome) who said quoting the LORD, "For My people are foolish, They know Me not; They are stupid children, They have no understanding." Israel surely it is time to hear the voice of the LORD.
and the original intent prior to the curse. And as far as it now being a choice, this also comes from Jewish doctrine. Being raised Lutheran, now in a Messanic congregation among Jews and non-Jews, I am not really versed in Protestant theology. Is that what some call any and all Christian teachings?
You obviously miss the point of the article.making Torah into somthing so hazy and mistladen that anyone can say anything and still imagine they are relevant to the discussion, is NOT Torah, nor Judaism, any more than kicking a basketball is not basketball even if it is fun.
If you cannot be relevant then stay out. Then again, perhaps you are right, and the article has nothing to do with anything Jewish and might well be about some non- Jewish cult or denomination.
The concepts of Tiflus is one that is a Jewish consensus.Jews have agreed with this for 3000 years and human nature has not changed much in fifty years. the article is actually proof of how true the Rabbis were. Yes, there are exceptions, but those quoted or mentioned are far from the exceptions I know, as chalk is from cheese..
Donkeys bite to crush bones, Rabbi Akiva taught. what do donkeys have against bones? Well consider that when a donkey looks at a horse he thinks the horse has bones and he does not. Donkeys are like the Ignoramus who hates the scholarly, those who grow intellectually and morally. The ignoramus will always try to destroy the Talmid Chacham because only then is there no challenge to remaining an ignoramus. If you criticize donkey droppings the donkey herd are going to try to bite. Sorry that is the way of the world.
She would never have tolerated such garbage masquerading as Torah. leave her out of any discussion of Sewer Sweepings.
But they taught their daughtwers to NOT make the mistakes the book and the article makes. No-one needs to eat an entire egg to know it has gone bad. You can usually tell by the smell.And if you cannot smell then you can tell when all the flies start buzzing around it.
See a good psychiatrist, darling, preferably one familiar with "Jerusalem syndrome. And if you have any doubts as to why we know you are delusional, Look at what Judaism actually tells us that the Manufacturers Instructions say about listening to Sages.
Those who criticize David have track-records, in many cases of being clueless as to basic Judaism, let alone to why the entire article is an exercise in ignorance. When someone with any knowledge critisizes, the cat's choir wail.Time to throw some shoes at ignorance and those who defend it.
this article is a collection of proofs that there definitely are women who do not understand even the basics of Torah. Trust Haaretz to showcase them. Are they exhibits in some future museum of the misguided Jew?
As anyone who has read the Five Books of Miriam will realize and have studied Nechama Leibowitz and Aviva Zornberg, NL AZ utilize the gedolim of the mesorah--Rashi, Ramban, Rambam, Abarbanel, etc. in their commentaries. Since there are no women whose analyses are part of the mesorah, NL and AZ don't quote any. What makes Ellen Frankel's commentary unique and innovative is that she tries to imagine what the words of the "gedolot" would have been: that is, what women MIGHT have said had their ideas been included in Talmudic discussions, or had their all-women's study sessions been recorded in a parallel women's Talmud. (I agree the reviewer's wording does not convey this clearly.)
Women were created from men to be a help-mate and so that we could "Be fruitful and multiply" In the resurrection there is neither male nor female; "We will be as the angles in Heaven" Male/female is a thing of the flesh, not the Spirit. We really don't have to live under the curse anymore; now it is a choice. Walk in the Spirit.
As Rachel notes, isn't there a rather well-known woman being ignored here?
The Sage who considered teaching Torah to women tiflut (frivolity or rather immorality) was Eliezer ben Hyrkanus, with a shammaite mindset and obviously chauvinistically contemptuous of women.It's about time that women take possession of Torah as they, too, stood at Sinai. You, Avi, are stuck in antiquity ! David
Women aren't equal partners in Judaism.I suggest that you read this Shabbat's Parsha on Adam and Hava. i It declares that a a woman is an adjunct to her husband. any kind of feminist interpretation of Tanach, that presents Torah in an egalitarian light is pasul. The 'male chauvanistic' line is Torah Judaism. We are not part of the 21st century global village where late ninteenth and twentieth century social change and social thought has to effect our thinking. We are part of the 3320 year continuum from Sinai. See the Ra'avad in 'Baalei Nefesh' for afurther elicidation of Jewish thought,on the subject.
Ms. Frankel is by no means the first. Ever heard of Nehama Lebowitz or Aviva Zornberg?
I would like to know if all you people with opoinions have read the book? And Avi yeruahlmi- what are you afraid of? Maybe something will disturb your tunnel vision. Not all the Sages were of the same opinion and many sages and scholars taught their daughters as well as there sons.
This book isn't new. It's been available in the US for at least two years if not more. I have a copy, received as a present in 2005. It's a wonderful book! No substitute for actually studying the weekly parsha, but excellent alongside.
You will stand before HaShem one day and give an account for what Torah teaches, not what the sages argued about and said or did not say. What is important is what the LORD G-d of Israel says. If you want to quote the sages quote the parts that agree with the Holy Word. They will not stand in your defence before G-d. You stand alone with His revelation to you,(the Tanach) having been expected you to use the brain he obviously gave you. He wants you to hear from Him not men/women.
Don't blame me! I didn't make it up. the Sages said it.
Shame on you Avi for your disrespect of women. You are a disgrace to your Maker. It was bad enough Eve being misled, but you follow in her footsteps. What would Israel have done without Deborah? What would we have done without Hadassha/Ester? Frivolous? No you are frivilous and need yor eyesight restored. I may not agree with this book, but you are a poor example of one that claims to follow G-d.
It seems this is another departure from the teachings of the LORD. The bitter waters of Mara will kill you. They could NOT drink the water. Exodus 15:25. Can anyone explain why a tree had to be thrown in to the water to make it sweet? The water is always bitter until you find the tree that sweetens, and the Rock that produces living water. The scritures are so clear and wonderful.And He so wants Jews to understand what "living" is all about.
He who teaches his daughter Torah teaches here frivolity. This book proves it.
.....Nechama Leibowitz ????????????