WikiLeaks exposed the true Mideast conflict
He is not merely undermining the world order - Assange is dangerous because he has shattered accepted dogma the Middle East.
By Ari Shavit Tags: Israel news Iran nuclear Middle East peace WikiLeaksJulian Assange is a dangerous criminal. This strange man with his long blond hair and misanthropic expression is not merely a cyberterrorist of a new kind. He is not merely a delusory anarchist humiliating the greatest power on earth. He is not merely an uninhibited megalomaniac disrupting modern diplomacy and undermining the world order. Assange is a dangerous criminal because he has shattered the accepted dogma on the understanding in the Middle East in the 21st century.
This dogma stated the following: The main problem in the Middle East is the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The main problem in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the occupation. The main problem in the occupation is the settlements. Therefore if we just stop the settlements, the occupation will begin to end, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict will be solved and the Middle East will be stable.
In the last decade, this dogma became fixed and was sanctified. It became a kind of core belief that cannot be questioned. This was the truth they swore to in the White House, the Elysee Palace and 10 Downing Street. This was the truth they reported in The Washington Post, Le Monde and The Guardian. This was the truth that incorporated the supreme moral gravity that formed the worldview of enlightened elites in the West and directed the policies of the Western powers.
Then along came Assange and shattered the dogma. The secret documents that WikiLeaks published proved that the settlements, the occupation and even the Israeli-Palestinian conflict were not the main problem in the Middle East. The confidential e-mails proved that the world they were talking about in Washington, Paris and London was an imaginary world. Assange proved that there was no connection between the real Middle East and the Middle East they talk about in The Washington Post, Le Monde and The Guardian. He revealed that the entire Arab world is currently busy with one problem only - Iran, Iran, Iran.
There is no doubt about it - Assange is a dangerous criminal. But he is dangerous not because he penetrated the Pentagon's information systems but because he revealed the Western intelligentsia's lack of intellectual integrity. Assange is dangerous not because he leaked state secrets on an unprecedented scale but because he revealed to us all that the West's hegemonic discourse is superficial and mendacious. Assange is dangerous not because he embarrassed the West's allies but because he proved that the West is contaminated by political correctness that cuts it off from the diplomatic reality. Assange placed a giant mirror in front of us all and proved the extent to which we had been duped in recent decades. A false dogma has prevented us from looking logically at the historic challenge facing us.
But let's not confuse things. The settlements are indeed a disaster. The occupation is intolerable. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is dangerous. But now that the blond misanthrope has opened our eyes, we must no longer shut them. The confidential e-mails must be read and reread so they can be understood. There is no chance for the current diplomatic process, they say. There is no chance of signing an Israeli-Palestinian agreement as long as Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) is living under the menacing shadow of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. There is no chance of regional peace as long as the Arab world is living under Tehran's incessant threat.
After all, just as the Egyptian president, the Saudi king and the Gulf emirs whisper, Iran is the heart of the problem. Iran is the source of the poison and the source of the consternation. As long as Iran is growing stronger, is seeking nuclear weapons and is terrorizing the Middle East, there is no chance for peace.
The lesson is a bitter one. If Iran develops nuclear weapons, peace will disappear. A nuclear Iran will deal a final blow to the chance of achieving a compromise between Israelis and Arabs. Therefore the dove of peace has to be extremely hawkish toward Iran. The peace-seeker must deal with Iran.
The opposite is also true. Anyone who wants to appease Ahmadinejad is betraying peace. Anyone who takes a lenient view of the ayatollahs is abandoning Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and Abu Mazen. It's true that a moratorium on the settlements will help in the struggle against the centrifuges. But only such a moratorium will make it possible to dismantle the settlements. When we rise from the ruins of the dogma, the strategic order of things is utterly clear - Iran first.
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
Shavit has found what he wanted to find...that the Arab countries are also concerned about Iran. Everyone knew this. And, of course, he also found something else he wanted to find...not much talk about the Palestinians, the settlements and the occupation. And, of course, this means to him that all is well and that we can continue the status quo. That is nonsense. The only way the world will be able to deal with Iran is to first settle our little problem with the Palestinians and Syria. There is nothing in these low level leaked memos that suggests otherwise. True, the rulers of the Arab countries don't much care about the Palestinians, but their people do and they risk revolution unless the Palestinian issue is settled first.
!. The Arab world is not monolithic, despite our ignorance in referring to everyone in the Middle East that is not Israel as "the Arabs". 2. The various countries in the Middle East have their own issues and viewpoints, and some of them have nothing whatsoever to do with Israel or the Palestinians! 3. Iran is not an "Arab" country. 4. The idea that Europe and the US are worried about Iran does not mean that there is blanket approval for all actions by all those worried by Iran. 5. While many things are intertwined, Iran is one issue and Palestine is another issue. The rest of the world has caught on to that. We, in our ethnocentricism, refuse to see that. 6. Our blindness will be our undoing because we refuse to understand what is actually happening, and hence we are unprepared to cope. At best, we will be dragged along with new developments, always a few steps behind. 7. I would expect a journalist to have a wider frame of reference for his writing. Oops, my mistake.
... not because of what they say, but rather that they simply present all the words of the true brokers of power and them speak for themselves. Those in power find this exceptionally threatening, of course. To me this is perfect journalism: deep investigation and tons of facts, with little analysis. Let the reader decide what it all means. Wikileaks has my vote ....
Why is it necessary to deal with Iran "FIRST"? Why does an end to the settlements and the occupations have to wait until the issue of Iran is dealt with? And WHAT, Mr. Shavit, will be the NEXT "existential threat" which replaces Iran once it IS dealt with? And there WILL be a next: right? There will ALWAYS be something that has to be dealt with "FIRST"! And by the way, the deluge of wires documenting ME diplomatic discussions on the Iranian threat probably has more to do with Israel's obsession as anything else. And every discussion held with Arab states that outlined their shared concerns, ALSO mentioned the importance of reaching a settlement in the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. It is NO less important to regional peace than is stopping Iran's nuclear pursuits. The difference for the Arab nations is only that the status quo of the Palestinian issue bears a less imminent outcome...because if Iran acquires nukes - there's no changing it later on.
I love your analysis
I am afraid, the pandemy of political correctness with its obsession on Israel and conbventional lies, won't be confronted. Anti-Semitism isn't bothered by facts, by revelations about what the Saudi King and the Gulf Emirs really think. As Sartre concluded, anti-Semitism, disguised as a negative obsession with everything regarding Israel, won't give way to sanity. Even if we are shown that it's Iran, not the Palestinian-Israel conflict what is propelling the horrors of the Middle East, the posters at Haaretz will continue their mantras as if nothing happened. My only hope is that Obama, in the midst of his fury at Assange and Wikilkeaks, takes a look at what Arab leaders really think, and gets it. He is the key to avoiding a nuclear armed Iran.