Peace, cottage cheese and the dentist
Bibi speaks of unconditional negotiations but presents the Palestinians with the condition that they recognize Israel as a Jewish state. And let's say they recognize us and sign, then what?
By Yoel MarcusThe Israelis and the Palestinians are alike in their inexplicable fear of the dentist. They postpone one appointment after another with various excuses, knowing in their hearts that their teeth will not improve. They avoid the painful operation, but in the end the inevitable will happen. It will be both painful and expensive.
Both patients know the truth and the serious consequences of avoidance, but they can't bring themselves to the frightening dentist's chair. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, if we stick with this metaphor, is playing the self-confident hero, while Defense Minister Ehud Barak is describing the situation as an approaching tsunami. The two complement one another with confidence that everything will be all right. What did the hunchback say? Do you know how I got to be a hunchback? Everyone slapped me on the back saying that everything would be all right.
There are moments in history, says opposition leader Tzipi Livni, when the approaching fiasco is written on the wall: We're on a collision course with the world. It makes no difference whether it happens in September or October - the process has already begun. There is less understanding for Israel's behavior; Israel is being described as a colonialist country. "In politics, as in criminal law, a failure to prevent a crime is considered a failure after the fact," Livni says.
At this stage it's still not too late. It's not yet September. It's not yet certain that the Palestinians have decided they want to carry out the threat of UN recognition of a Palestinian state. At a meeting of the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee this week, it was reported that the Palestinian leaders are having second thoughts about whether to stick with the "gesture" of recognition by the UN General Assembly - not only because of the danger that the United Nations might base its decision on the 1947 partition plan, which divided the country into a Jewish state and an Arab state. The UN decision is liable to turn out to be a joke. While Israel will be recognized as a Jewish state to which the Palestinians object so strongly, the burden of proof that the Arabs in the original decision are actually Palestinians will hit them like a hammer.
September has become an important month not only because of the discussion that will or won't take place about recognizing divided Palestine as a state. Something else will be happening then far more important than the hollow decision at the United Nations: the Egyptian election. This event is important for us when it comes to the peace treaty that has lasted 30 years, but above all when it comes to the kind of Egypt that will arise after the Tahrir Square uprising. Will the election produce a government ruled by the Muslim Brotherhood? Will Egypt continue to be a responsible, stable and peace-loving nation? Will America, Europe and the moderate countries in the region be able to see it as an island of sanity and responsibility?
It's crucial that Israel be removed from the discourse about Egypt's election battle. It's important for Israel to be in advanced negotiations for an agreement with the Palestinians at the time of the Egyptian elections, not in a state of stagnation. So we have to switch from a mode of propaganda and haggling to a mode of a moderate policy. We've been operating for too long in the propaganda arena and not enough with a positive and pragmatic policy. The switch to rapprochement and recognition must be the product of an Israeli initiative.
American commentators say U.S. President Barack Obama does not have outbursts of anger, or a tendency to publicly insult people who have hurt him. But he doesn't forget. The trick that Bibi pulled on him in Washington is the type of thing one doesn't forget, unless we understand where we erred and how to help the administration in the two tests in September, both with an initiative to renew negotiations based on the 1967 lines and by refraining from presenting ultimatums.
Bibi speaks of unconditional negotiations but presents the Palestinians with the condition that they recognize Israel as a Jewish state. And let's say they recognize us and sign, then what? Don't we have experience from the time of the road map, when the first condition was to stop terror? All these caprices from both sides are not to the point. We're creating the problem and we're suffering the consequences. This is nearly the last moment to be serious about the summons to the dentist. Without teeth we'll be forced to eat cottage cheese, and that's too high a price to pay for giving up on peace.
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
Something you leftist obviously have a problem with, but the majority of Israelis don't. As far as Egypt is concerned, don't place Egypt's election on Israel's shoulders. What the Egyptians do or not do for their country is up to them.
Nations do not conduct themselves like Don Quixote of the song, and do not pursue impossible goals. The Zealots of the 1st century rebelled against reality and caused the Jewish people to be dispersed for 2000 years, while the Zionist realists of the 20th century were able to gather back the Exiles. Requiring legitimacy by having the Palestinians and the world recognize Israel as the nation-state of the Jews is an impossible dream, and for many reasons. 1. We are moving beyond the age of nation states. Example: EU. Where do you see a country where some ethnic group has more rights than others? The last one was South Africa. The world believes in Democracy, not Ethnocracy. 2. The Islamic world itself does not recognize ethnic rights. "There are no nations in Islam" said the Prophet Muhammad. The different Islamic countries today are seen as an unfortunate temporary situation until a Khalif takes over. 3. The core Israeli wish, however misstated, is that the Arabs should recognize that the Jews have had a history in the region, that they used to own the holyland and are merely coming back. But this is a call for a historical determination. Political leaders are not historians and have no authority even if they accept such a claim (wink wink). 4. Even if the Arabs believe in the history of the Jews as the Jews see it, they have their own valid claim, such as: Where do you have a law entitling a people to reclaim an ancient possession it lost in what is a common historical occurence? 5. Even if such a unique law is accepted, the Palestinians have another valid claim: They are also descendents of the ancient residents of the area. Why should the Jews have more rights than them?// CONCLUSION: At best, Israel can legitimize the SHARING of the Land with the Palestinians.