• Published 01:43 09.06.10
  • Latest update 01:43 09.06.10

Not by cement alone

The flotilla, like its predecessors and the ones still to come, serves the Israeli goal, which is to complete the process of separating the Gaza Strip from the West Bank.

By Amira Hass

The achievement of the failed flotilla to Gaza - mainly, it must be conceded, by its dead - is that the demand is being heard from everywhere that Israel halt its policy of siege. The government of Israel was not willing to listen to the desperate supplications of John Ging, the head of UNRWA in Gaza. Now it must heed French President Nicolas Sarkozy and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan. But unknowingly, this flotilla, like its predecessors and the ones still to come, serves the Israeli goal, which is to complete the process of separating the Gaza Strip from the West Bank. The process, it will be said here for the millionth time, started in 1991 and not after the rise of Hamas rule. It's purpose was to thwart the two-state solution, which the world understood at that time as based on all of Gaza and the West Bank, and the link between them.

Since the method of sailing to Gaza started about two years ago, none of its initiators purported to meet the need for this or that product. Israel is attempting by signs and wonders to prove there is no hunger in Gaza. The initiators are actually thinking about hunger of a different kind: a very human hunger for a direct link to the world, to freedom of movement of people, not just goods. The seaborne method was later switched to overland breaches to the Strip via Rafah, to Egypt's displeasure and Israel's joy.

Israel brought the closure to grotesque and petty proportions, attracting attention with its prohibition on macaroni and permission for cinnamon, the counting of calories and delaying cement even for a sewage treatment plant. Israel expanded the closure to the extent of prohibiting Gazans from working, creating, manufacturing and earning a living, with the declared goal of bringing down Hamas. But it achieved the opposite. That rule only grew stronger, proving its resourcefulness, its ability to suppress internal opposition and engender support by international activists who are ideologically opposed to its methods and philosophy. The siege strengthened Hamas to such an extent that Palestinian conspiracy theorists are convinced this was Israel's intention from the outset.

Most Israelis, who have given up on real information, find it difficult to absorb that some people in the world are shocked at the existence of a huge prison whose warden is the Jewish state. But those who are shocked have become partners in the pressure campaign - supported, if not instigated by Hamas - against Egypt to unilaterally open the Rafah crossing, as if it is the occupier and not Israel.

And what serves the goal of separating Gaza from the West Bank better than forgetting the sealed the Erez crossing between Gaza and Israel, and focusing on Rafah and cement? Unintentionally, the runners of the maritime and media blockade focused attention on aspects that do not undermine the essence of Israel's closure of Gaza. And that essence is denying the right and thwarting the will of Gazans to be an active, permanent and natural part of Palestinian society.

Long before Israel prohibited the entry of cement into the Strip, it prohibited Gazans from studying in the West Bank. While it still permitted guavas to be exported from Khan Yunis to Jordan, it forbade Gazans to enter the West Bank even via the Allenby Bridge or to meet relatives and friends. Step by step, Israel developed draconian restrictions on Palestinians' freedom of movement, until it declared every Gazan in the West Bank, now and especially in the future, an illegal alien and an infiltrator. These are the essential prohibitions that must be breached. These are the prohibitions about whose existence Erdogan and U.S. President Barack Obama must be taught, and their abolition demanded.

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 6. 13 42
    Amira forgets:PA and Hamas can't even reconcile themselves!!!
    • arthur
    • 09.06.10
    • 14:42

    Amira the free movement between Gaza and the Westbank was abused by those who brought in money and explosives as well as technology to build rockets to attack Israel from the Westbank. Amira should have pointed out that Gaza is isolated because Hamas wants it this way, Hamas is a dictatorship which tortures and murders Palestinians above all and that if Hamas accepts the existence of Israel and does not attack industrial zones with mortars like the Erez crossing Gaza would not have been isolated from the Westbank. Amira I expected better reporting from such an internationaly praised journalist.

  • 5. 16 41
    How Silly will You Feel When Peace Includes Gaza and WB?
    • Jane
    • 09.06.10
    • 14:15

    Everyone knows that any future agreement will include Gaza and the West Bank. The problem here is Hamas and not Israel. In as much as I deplore the Netanyahu government I don't buy into the typical ME conspiracy theories. Amira should start talking to more Jews and get some perspective beyond that of radical Islamsists.

  • 4. 61 16
    wonderful!
    • JacksonBackson
    • 09.06.10
    • 13:21

    Beautifully written and explained. I'm glad to see that someone in Israeli media sees this for what it is.

  • 3. 45 11
    Clearer now...
    • Bruce
    • 09.06.10
    • 11:38

    At first I was confused when Israel linked the flotilla to Hamas & Al Queda - it was obvious that Israel would have to ease the blockade of Gaza & by linking the flotilla to Hamas they empower Hamas to say "we solved the blockade, even Israel said so" enhancing their popularity in Gaza. I suspect Amira Hass is correct - by creating more division between the West Bank & Gaza, Israel makes a 2 state solution less viable or likely. Something I've long suspected of some of the more extreme elements in Israeli politics. Perhaps it is time for a smart Palestine to say "all these facts on the ground make it impossible for the 2 state solution to work. What we want is a single state & the right to vote" & really mean it. No reasonable human being can object to a demoracy can they?

  • 2. 15 65
    This is why it's so hard to read Amira Hass...
    • dean
    • 09.06.10
    • 11:14

    Not because of her position. Not because of her conclusion. But because, like Gideon Levy, she argues so poorly. You can't persuade unless you knock down the counterarguments. If you don't mention that free movement between the West Bank and Gaza would allow Hamas to strengthen in the territories -- if only to explain why it wouldn't -- then I'm left holding on to my assumptions. We need commentators who challenge our preconceptions. We don't need more preachers trying to batter us into their point of view.

    • 31 3
      "... allow Hamas to strengthen in the territories...."
      • EGB
      • 09.06.10
      • 14:51

      is so vague that I wonder how you raise it as a "counterargument" that must be dealt with, as it would by a high school debating team. The article deals very well with the fact that Israeli policies have strengthened Hamas in Gaza. Hamas' success will cross borders as ideas, without being carried by bodies. Physical blockade and exile are just more examples of unsustainable policies of force that do not end the conflict. In fact, these policies that obviate unification of the PA and Hamas will not only prevent peace, they are going to provoke a large war - soon. Does that surprise anyone?

    • 5 12
      It was meant to be vague.
      • dean
      • 09.06.10
      • 16:33

      It wasn't a counterargument, only an indication that there are some but that none was mentioned. Nor does the article deal well with the fact Israeli policies have strengthened Hamas in Gaza. It merely states it. (David Landau presents a much better case for that in this week's Economist.) You may be right though that ideas cross borders even when people can't but I suspect that there's a value in having experts on-hand to train bomb-makers and rocketeers, and charismatic types need to be on the scene to recruit and build teams. I may be wrong about that, but commentators should be knocking those assumptions down, not leaving them in place.

  • 1. 64 10
    Friend and foe
    • David G
    • 09.06.10
    • 05:38

    Hamas learned to "engender support by international activists who are ideologically opposed to its methods and philosophy." And so did Likud. The entire point of AIPAC seems to be getting domestic American liberals to support the Israeli equivalent of Dick Cheney. Through the looking glass...