Netanyahu needs to cut left-wing NGO's foreign life line
If left-wing activists had even a basic sense of self-respect, they would have told their donor countries: Thanks, but we'll use our own resources to realize our shared goals.
By Israel HarelHuman rights activists claim that the transparency law is undemocratic.
But don't they realize they also stand to benefit from such a law? After all, it would also expose the sources of right-wing organizations. But what would be so awful about exposing the sources of the money that finances studies assailing academic freedom, the campaign against the New Israel Fund or land purchases and construction in the settlements?
|
Prime Minister Netanyahu speaking to EU ambassadors. “Stop intervening in Israeli legislation,” is what the government should have said |
| Photo by: Ariel Jerozolimski |
Evidently, they fear it would also reveal that they themselves have sold their souls to advance the interests of foreign countries. And then, when the inevitable outcry erupt, a law might even be passed forbidding them to accept such donations. And what would these hordes of activists live off of then?
The transparency law would indeed have been unnecessary had these "activists" internalized what sovereignty means. If they had even a basic sense of self-respect, they would have told their donor countries: Thanks, but we'll use our own resources to realize our shared goals.
The State of Israel was established so that the Jewish people would once again be sovereign in its own land. Sovereignty, among other things, means keeping foreigners from interfering in domestic issues.
It also means that if foreign countries do start meddling in our affairs again, as they did in the dark days of exile, we should contemptuously turn our backs on them. "Stop intervening in Israeli legislation," is what the government should have said in response to the statement issued by the European Union yesterday, in which it voiced support for the leftist organizations it funds in Israel.
The saddest symptom of this phenomenon is the continued yearning to please the foreigners and dance to their tune - to act as "front organizations" for countries that hide their hostile attitudes toward Israel and to further these countries' interests in exchange for payment, even when they oppose the policies of Israel's elected government. What is particularly problematic is their effort to alter Israeli public opinion so that Israelis will elect a government more amenable to their funders.
Those engaged in providing services to countries that seek to alter the political situation in Israel are not innocent. They know very well why their service is being commissioned and who it really serves.
Norway and Sweden do not engage directly in recruiting Israeli front organizations; they do have some inhibitions. Usually, it is the organizations that apply to them, or else to EU institutions. The organizations then submit detailed plans for how they think it might be possible to alter political views in Israel. The EU, under its freedom of information policy, publishes such documents on its websites.
The funders, as is the nature of funders, want to see results. And the Israeli entrepreneurs make haste, with unseemly vigor, to supply them. So every year, new organizations arise, which rummage through the same garbage and roll in the same dunghills. Yet, miracle of miracles, all of them find countries to adopt them and fund them generously, even when Europe is suffering an economic slowdown.
These organizations also have a silent partner - the Israeli government. Weak-willed and lacking confidence in the rightness of its path, it allows foreigners to meddle in its affairs. Britain, by contrast, would protest "It's not done" if Israel were, for instance, to donate to Scottish separatists. And Spain would pound on the table and threaten to sever diplomatic relations if Israel were to offer even verbal support for Basque aspirations.
There is no need for public rebukes. Personal conversations between the prime minister and the heads of certain European governments (some of whom may not even be aware that their embassies in Israel support leftist organizations ) might well suffice to reduce this practice significantly.
Unless, of course, Benjamin Netanyahu is perfectly happy to have Switzerland keep funding the Geneva Initiative, or to have Britain's embassy in Israel keep funding radical organizations that, inter alia, are working to unseat him.
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
If that is truely what Israel wants stop milking other countries for money and military support, get out of our politics and then you might have right to complain. As the country that has been subsidized more than any other in history get used to the countries paying your way telling you what you should do.
Because the sources hate Israel and want to destroy Jews.
"Sovereignty, among other things, means keeping foreigners from interfering in domestic issues." Really? You best get on the line to AIPAC and their analogues throughout the rest of the world then. Unless, that is, it's alright for Israelis to meddle in the domestic politics of other countries. But wait, wouldn't that be hypocritical?
.. and that is the reason, why it doesn't matter if they get dismantled or not. They already have delivered more than enough information to delegitimize Israel several times over.
And you wonder why Jews outside Israel are losing interest in identifying with you!
As long as the funding is transparent there should be no problem with it. So when the US, an ally of Israe, funds Israel, there is nothing wrong with that. But when Saudi Arabia, an enemy of Israel funds organizations in Israel, there is definitely a problem with this. Saudi Arabia is not going to fund an organization which promotes the welfare of Israel. Anf if someone asks, how do I know the funds come from Saudi Arabia, well thats what transparency is about.
Until you agree to cut those lifelines too you're not someone to be taken seriously. You come off as a crank.
There are no 'illegal' settlements by Israelis. It's all Israel and it's all for the Jews!
But the thing is that its not, and you can say this over and over again, but it doesnt change the fact that the Israeli government even recognizes the status of the West Bank as "Not Israel" - additionally, Israeli commitments to abide by international agreements legitimizes this - If Israel wants to be taken seriously as a member of the international community, your cry of "Judea and Samaria" is not helping anyone
You then launch into a tirade that is aimed directly at the left! And your clear innuendos that there are dark undermining motives against the state of Israel that lie behind their funding are little more than outright lies. The effort is to change a policy that is detrimental not only to Israeli security, but international security as well. The settlements are NOT Israel! Quit trying to indocrinate people into thinking they are! You don't like the fact that western nations seek to change your extralegal activities in the occupied territory, then quietly accept the alternative that is no doubt soon to find fruition...which is an outright international boycott and sanctions. You'll scream about that too, won't you? You're already screaming about the few that exist...we can just imagine how it'll be then. Your commentary is nothing but pure right wing hasbara meant to protect the occupation and its settlement enterprise under a thinly veiled pretext of objectivity.
then you can start lecturing tiny NGOs about their relationships to foreigners .. Oh? You want the $3 billion? Oh? You can't build your precious settlements without all that money? Oh? You don't really mean that Israel should be self-sufficient? Oh? You're nothing but a hypocrite? How surprising!!!!
This aid is transparent. The US is an ally of Israel. Its when enemies of Israel donate to promote their anti Israel agenda, thats when the problem arises.
would in any other country have been interned or shot. the remarkable world experts who post in these columns need not only education but some real physical hard work to get their brains to function !
Any law cutting foreign funding of political activist organizations should apply equally to those whose activities support the sitting government's policies and those who oppose them. That's a concept the leftwing founders of my country, the U.S., called 'equal protection.' Ready to pass a law barring foreign monies now, Harel, or is the notion of equality under the law a little too leftist for you?
In a real democracy it would be laughable to even talk about a government targetting only those on one side of the political spectrum or the other. In Israel this is business as usual, since there are no protections for the minorities in Israel. If people have no rights, then the government can do anything. For those Israelis whose political beliefs coincide with the government, which is most of them, this is not a problem. Nobody anticipates that the left will rise again so there is no thought of risking revenge. This is the way that Israel operates and it seems to work for them. As an American tax payer, I don't want to support it. We should have the same goals in identifying all the various monies that America gives to Israel just as Israel investigates monies sent to the NGO's. The three billion a year which America gives Israel for weapons is only a part of the river of American tax payers money flowing into Israel.
1. The author confuses 'human rights' with leftist groups; dangerous attitude! 2. As a 'civilized' country, Israel is party to international treaties that undermine its sovereignty; including permitting public scrutiny on the degree of compliance; 3. Instead of undermining human rights NGOs, which in part kept a clean part of Israel's face, just stop the grave violations of international law. It's not like they do not happen if NGOs don't tell about them. 4. It's ironic that groups that are political and promote violation of international law; e.g. colonisation and discrimination, are encouraged, while those who stand for true human values are attacked; 5. Why a Bill/law? NGOs are obliged to declare their sourcs and report to government anyway. It's nothing about transparency; it's distorted politics where the 'majority' opresses the 'minority'. Congrats for the democracy oasis of the MA! Deal with it.
So long as all are equal under the law, we are all for transparency. Since more of the so-called left wing organizations (actually centrist mainstream by standards of western democratic countries supporting equal human rights, compliance with international law) are formally organized and reporting to tax authorities they are already more transparent. The right wing ones (truly right wing; anti-equal rights; main purpose is violate international law and to occassionally incite to murder prime ministers) are often unofficial, funnelling right wing money not only to public activism to but secret private settlement development.
as much of it is used to build illegal settlements and steal land from the Palestinians. Such patronising nonsense---pure zionistic drivel.
we can examine foreign (right-wing fundamentalist Christian) funding of right-wing groups, and remind Bibi that he did once promise to cease receiving foreign aid from the US ...
handouts of the USA... " if foreign countries do start meddling in our affairs again" ... this is total hogwash as Israel loves the US diaspora's 'meddling' $$$ money!
Stop taking billions of dollars every year from American taxpayers, some of which goes to support the Jewish terrorists living in The West Bank.
The US government funds Human Rights Watch, which, criticizes the USA and American allies in Europe; European states provide funding to Amnesty International which criticizes them and the USA. What Harel is describing isn't something new or controversial in the West. The British don't care if Israel funds the Jewish Agency or Jewish lobby groups in Britain because it is one state amongst many that fund groups within its borders; it also helps Britain that it doesn't have a cancerous military occupation in which 2.5 million people are held in bondage
"The Israeli government, weak willed and lacking confidence in the rightness of its path.." What path Harel? This government has no path other than to appease those it needs to keep their seats warm in cabinet. Your article also forgets to apply your (in my opinion flawed) logid to right wing NGO's. Why dont you care to mention wealthy chritistian and jewish donors in the USA who without their immense funding would probably cause the settler movement to collapse.
... to build itself. The Left in Israel are not building Israel by their foreign ideologies they are encouraging the enemies of the jewish state to destroy the unity that always has been the strength of the jewish success in building their only home land. A state without being jewish is the diaspora again,
Alternatively, the left are trying to hold Israel to the moral, political and legal standards that are norms in the international community of liberal democracies to which Israel claims to belong.
"It also means that if foreign countries do start meddling in our affairs again, as they did in the dark days of exile, we should contemptuously turn our backs on them." Quite right, Harel, kick out the American settlers and their money from the West Bank and E. Jerusalem! Oh wasn't that what you meant? Is it only SOME foreigners you disagree with? Only those who don't share your right-wing opinions?
Numerous on line news media are reporting that the brits are offering Qadaffi political assylum returning the favor his giving BP all those oil rights in return for releasing a mass murderer of Americans in return for not exposing what he knows about Brit massacres of Jews fduring the Shoah in return..... I do notice a continuing symbiotic relationship between your 2 muslim states
No wonder you can't endorse I.H's wish Israel turned away from similar pressure
i doubt there will be any action against the right wing groups even if they get funding from abroad, netenyahu will find a loop hole to let them keep working.
It would have been nice if he'd bothered to bolster his argument with some concrete examples of shady foreign governments funding these horrible subversive leftist groups, instead of just making vague allusions to European countries. As it is, it doesn't say much for his credibility. Neither does the fact that his own settler movement is the one that's going to spell the end of Israeli democracy, and I'm pretty sure it gets some foreign funding.
There are probably a dozen schemes to circumvent this law, a storm in a tea cup.