Like Netanyahu, Barak wants second shot as prime minister
Haaretz-Dialog survey shows Barak has overcome public's disgust and is once again considered legitimate.
By Aluf Benn Tags: Ehud Barak Israel newsHis career has been eulogized more than once. They said he would never be leader again, that he was insensitive, arrogant and disconnected from the people. They reckoned that his party was disintegrating and predicted that he would defect to the rival camp and glean crumbs from the table of his historical antagonist. All the same, Ehud Barak is returning to the center of the political arena and has once again joined the list of candidates for prime minister. A Haaretz-Dialog survey published last Friday confirmed a gut feeling: Barak is the most popular person in the cabinet.
True, he came last in that list of candidates for the premiership, and true, defense ministers always enjoy support in times of peace. But the elections will not take place tomorrow, and Barak is not running for prime minister right now. The survey shows that Barak has overcome the public's disgust and is once again considered legitimate. That's all he needs for the moment.
Barak's comeback campaign has been going on for a few weeks, after a lengthy period during which he was seen as the copilot to his former subordinate in the military, Benjamin Netanyahu. It does not suit Barak to serve as number two, and he is behaving like his old self again and trying to separate himself from the prime minister. The lack of a border with the Palestinians "within the historic Land of Israel" is a greater threat than the Iranian bomb, Netanyahu declared, when he spoke at Auschwitz about the Islamic Republic, "the new Amalek." Barak wants peace with Syria, even at the price of returning the Golan Heights. Netanyahu doesn't.
Barak likes attacking the "left" for its naivete and blindness, but he has adopted the left's generations-old knockout argument: If we do not partition the land between us and the Palestinians, Israel will become an apartheid state. Like his great rival, Ehud Olmert, Barak has concluded that only partition can save Zionism. Netanyahu is someplace else. He ostensibly backs a two-state solution, but now he is trying to overcome the demographic threat by giving the vote to Israelis living abroad. He will accompany negotiations with the Palestinians with a propaganda campaign against anti-Israel incitement in the Palestinian Authority.
A tipping point in the delicate equilibrium between the prime minister and the defense minister became evident during the brouhaha over the Netanyahu family's maid. Barak, too, had maid troubles, which on the face of it were far more serious. Mr. and Mrs. Barak employed an illegal migrant, whereas Bibi and Sara's maid was legally employed and only complained of bad working conditions.
But Barak ignored the matter, making do with a noncommittal statement from his office, while Netanyahu accused the media of persecuting him and took advantage of a state visit to Germany to defend his wife publicly. Barak never implored the media "to leave Nili alone," and his insensitivity seems to have paid off in retrospect. Netanyahu slipped back into his old image, the pressured and sweaty one, while Barak displayed self-control and restraint - precisely the qualities the public wants for the hand on the red button.
Barak has not changed. He has always been respected but not liked. As defense minister he is demonstrating the same capability as he did in the army - to read the situation correctly and avoid the snags that hit others. His proposal to end Operation Cast Lead after a number of days, as distinct from Olmert who wanted to go on and on, was justified, and it immunized him against the Goldstone report's allegations. Meanwhile, preparing the army for the mission and the low number of Israeli casualties were notched up to his credit.
Barak's aspirations are based on two models. One is Yitzhak Rabin, who used his term as defense minister to correct his image as a weak prime minister and return to the helm as the national savior. The other is none other than Netanyahu, who received a divided and fractured Likud in 2006 and came back with it to government in 2009. Barak believes that if they succeeded, so can he. His chances depend on how the security situation plays out. If there is a national crisis, Barak could be called on to take over because of his experience and composure. An unsuccessful war could gravely damage his career, as happened to Moshe Dayan and Amir Peretz, and to Barak himself in the second intifada.
During the Olmert period, Barak tried to moderate the prime minister's aggression, to delay or shorten military operations. His critics say he feared that Olmert would take all the credit. Will Barak behave the same way when Netanyahu brings the Iranian bomb issue up for a decision? Will he manage to leverage the crisis to his own advantage and come back to the leadership in a big way?
|
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak. |
| Photo by: (Alon Ron) |
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
Barak will become Prime Minister again. For some reason in Israeli politics there is the misconception that a good general will make a good prime minister or other high political official. That's like an education system thinking that a good teacher will automatically make a good administrator. It just ain't so. Aluf Benn - what world are you living in? If you like Fantasyland, maybe try a visit to Disney ?World. It's in Orlando, Florida.
Barak was less effective as PM of Israel than Joe Clark was of Canada--and he was willing to give up a lot of territory to evil Naziesque Arafat (who, not even "Palestinian" but Egypt-born son of Egyptian father and Syrian mother--appointed as "leader" by Nazi-kissing Mufti Haj-amin Husseini) and then got spurned (like Chamberlain acceding to Hitler's demands). And, like Clark (who attempted to run again for PM in 2000--and lost badly) Barak is quite delusional that people will want him again. (edit: unlike Barak, Clark DID learn after his 2000 defeat--he agreed in 2004 to merge his party with Alliance under leadership of Stephen Harper, current PM)
The greatest sin of an Israeli PM is to appear weak, even if just for a moment. Bibi gave up Hebron on his first try. Barak retreated from Lebanon and the dream of all those lovely settlements south of the Latani. The second time around is meant to be so harsh and unyeilding that the memory of their moment of "weakness" is erased from history. This is why Olmert went nuts at every provocation, presiding over the two most vicious bloodbahs in recent history. Olmert may go down in history as a crook and a cheat, but, at least, he avoided the more serious sin of weakness. Bibi is currently searching for his moment of glory. Barak is only dreaming of his.
i wonder what will happen to all his rhetoric if he manages it? alot of what he "says" is pretty rational, yet little, if any of it, is evidenced in practice. it would be hard for him to ride the fence like that as pm. and THAT'S what would be interesting.
right?
The parties will make their promises and whoever delivers will be reelected.
If the opinion polls are to be believed than they prove one thing - that we are erratic. What can Barak possibly offer that is any better than what we have now? And what we have now is the worst. Barak would have to join the Likud and try to run it to have any kind of power/party base. He certainly doesn't have that at present - his leadership is a primary cause of the demise of the once predominant Labour Party. And why should we buy a re-tread? I guess the answer is that there isn't anyone else. And that's one of the major reasons we are so erratic.
For instance, I certainly don't like Netanyahu -the Likudnik and the liar, or Barak the "unlikeable". But both have that "je ne sais quoi" which no one else around has, which is absolutely necessary facing monsters like Ahmadinejad, Meshal or Nasrallah.
If Barak wants to fight another election as head of Labour then the left wing will be giving their votes to kadima. If Labour choose Barak as their choice candidate for the next election they are signing a suicide note. The man is finished and if he was smart he would retire from politics after the next election hand over the leadership to somebody else and he might make Labour electable again and he can go back to enjoying the good life.
Bring it on. No Prime Minister has ever been closer to a deal with the Arabs.
...not Labor Party`s. As such, he represents only himself. For the meantime, he uses the Labor Party for his interests.
Ehud Barak clearly pointed out that he's already been a member of Knesset with different portfolios as well as Prime Minister of Israel - and he doesn't necessarily want to be at the helm of the government. However, he should feel somewhat responsible for where we are today a) Camp David 2000 failure b) insisted Olmert resign from being PM c) stands out like a sore thumb compared to the other cabinet members d) supports PM Netanyahu who doesn't quite jive with policies of Labour party. Why should there always be dramatic differences between the type of leadership Israel elects when the options for a peaceful resolution with our adversaries are pretty clearly outlined in the Road Map?
Despite the left's best efforts to manufacture some support for Barak, he is finished. Of course, the left would love to see the coalition crumble, so it will try to drive a wedge between the two men. So transparent.