Israel was infiltrated, but no real borders were crossed
The Syrians penetrated an area held by the State of Israel, but they did not cross the Israeli border. Nor did Palestinians from the Gaza Strip attempt to cross the Israeli border in the south.
By Gideon BigerOn Sunday, May 15, which the Arabs call Nakba Day, the media reported that Syrian civilians had crossed over the Israeli border on the Golan Heights. The prime minister even issued a dramatic announcement of the fact and promising that Israel will protect its borders.
The incident raises the question of whether Israel has a border with Syria on the Golan Heights. The answer seems obvious, but in fact it is not. An international border is one reached by agreement between the two political entities on either side. Sometimes the line is the result of direct negotiations, but not always. Europe's post-World War II borders were drawn by the victors, while in the 19th century Africa was divided up by and among the great powers of Europe. Some of the states whose borders were drawn in that manner protested their location, but in the end they accepted the demarcation and it became an international border.
There are still some localized conflicts over the precise delimitation of borders still occur. Recent examples include those in Central America, between Nicaragua and Costa Rica; and in Southeast Asia, between Cambodia and Thailand. In both cases the argument is over the precise location of the border, not its very existence.
Israel is an atypical state in that it does not have agreed international borders with all of its neighbors. That is especially true in the case of Lebanon and Syria. Israel and Lebanon are currently separated by the so-called Line of Withdrawal of Israeli Forces from Lebanon, agreed in 2000 between Israel and the United Nations and also known as the Blue Line. It corresponds in part with the international border demarcated by the English and French governments in 1923. In practice, there is currently no border between Israel and Lebanon.
The situation on the border with Syria is more complex. In 1923 an international border was drawn between Mandatory Palestine and Syria, which was under French control. It persisted until Israel's War of Independence. As part of the armistice agreement, the so-called Green Line was created. Part of it runs west of the 1923 Mandate Line. The areas under Israeli control between the armistice line and the Mandate Line were demilitarized. The Six-Day War eliminated these boundaries, and a cease-fire line was created.
In 1974, after the Yom Kippur War, the United Nations brokered the Separation of Forces Agreement between Israel in Syria. It specified the creation of two lines delineating the areas of military control of each side. Several years after the demarcation of this line, known as the Purple Line, the Israeli cabinet approved a resolution unilaterally annexing the area held by the Israel Defense Forces to Israel and making the line on the Golan Heights Israel's border.
It was this line that Syrian citizens crossed this week. By any international criterion, this is not the border between Israel and Syria. There is still a need for an official agreement between the two countries to create an international border, just as the borders between Israel and Egypt and between Israel and Jordan were created as part of the peace agreements between the countries.
Therefore, on Sunday the Syrians penetrated an area held by the State of Israel, but they did not cross the Israeli border. Nor did Palestinians from the Gaza Strip attempt to cross the Israeli border in the south. They crossed the cease-fire line that was ratified in the Oslo Accords but never demarcated as a border between Israel and any neighbor in the south of the country.
The writer teaches in the geography department of Tel Aviv University.
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
What are you talking about it? A Syrian guy just got arrested in Tel Aviv.
temporary expressions of our collective fears and trauma. All borders were once created and once will vanish. Current day borders of Israel –within or beyond the Green Line will change. Question is: Will they change by dialogue or by fire? Israel is so comfortable and loudly proud of their 'global' scope and action fields. There is a feeling to 'rule' the world. Of course: As long as the world is ‘good’ for Israel and has no differing opinions. At the same time, there is a certain contempt with the world, Its ‘own’ borders are viewed l as the thick fortress walls keeping the wild goyim masses out. Inside the walls is no space for anything that reminds of the outer world. Such contradictive and defensive attitude, despite all muscle showing, diminishes greatly the chances for peaceful change or demarcation of borders. A friend, Shalom, Salaam anyway!
"A border is agreed". " the United Nations brokered the Separation of Forces Agreement between Israel in Syria". (in a word, "agreed")
one went all the way to tel aviv, stupid article
That if the IDF marched into Damascus, no real border would have been crossed. Just FYI.
Following your "argument": If the IDF would "walk" direction Damascus, it would be an "infiltration", but not the crossing of borders.
what legalistic nonsense!. This statement by Biger shows how some academics live detached from reality and can only function in a classroom.
If you say it should be written "Syrians crossed the cease fire lines" no problem, but this way of writting things likely to put blame on Israel does not help, not to inform and not to bring attention to the so diminished left in Israel.
Can anyone explain how Israel had a war of independence in 1948? Israel did not exist prior to 1948. Therefore,logically, it could not have had a war of independence as it was not occupied. The war Israel had was a war of creation. I know independence is more cinematic but the truth of Israel's creation is real.
ln case you like to play the game of semantics you could say : rebirth or recreation since there was a kingdom of lsrael and a kingdom of Judea that in fact have metaphored in our time as the state of lsrael. And yes, there was a war of independence vis a vis the arabs and of course against the brits (but you knew that).
As I recall, it was the French and the British who set up the borders after the First World War. Should they be consulted???? Or does HaAretz suffice with pro-Arab propoganda?
"In practice, there is currently no border between Israel and Lebanon." Huh? A border is an imaginary line. On one side are real Lebanese soldiers and civilians. On the other side are real Israeli soldiers and civilians. I didn't think it could be any more complicated than that, but leave it to a professor to complicate things.
When, exactly?
THIS IS A CLEAR VIOLATION OF A CEASE FIRE AGREEMENT, SO, SHOULD WE GO AND INVADE THE OTHER SIDE OF THE ARMISTICE LINE AND EXPECT THE SYRIAN GOV TO DO NOTHING!!! PROBABLY NOT, AND PROBABLY THIS IS WHAT THE WRITTER WOULD SAY.... DOUBLE CRITERIA AS USUAL!!!
Israel violated it hundreds of times. Shut up.
How do you call the constant violation of Lebanese and Syrian airspace by the Israeli Air Force ? Thea visits ? Please !!!!!!!!
is the movement of human beings a breach of a ceasefire or is the shooting by the IDF and Border Police the breach?
Very good article, Toda Raba. As you point out, the situation is complex. Different lines, different interpretations, different propaganda. But the most important point is not if they crossed the blue or purple or the mandat or the armistice lines (but this is an interesting discussion, yes), but rather the potential threat against civilians in Israel. Is it easy for a terrorist with a bomb-belt to cross all those lines and mines and walk down to kibbutz Kfar Blum and cause a massacre?
The resulting ceasefire line (dubbed the "Purple Line" as it was drawn on the UN's maps) was supervised by a series of positions and observation posts manned by observers of the United Nations Truce Supervision Organisation and became the new effective border between Israel and Syria.
An Israeli who understands that no border was crossed!!!! A.M.A.Z.I.N.G. But then it is spoilt by this howler: "Several years after the demarcation of this line" .... "Israeli cabinet approved a resolution unilaterally annexing the area held by the Israel Defense Forces to Israel" Note the extreme vagueness about the date, even though every other historical event is carefully dated. *chortle*. I know why he can't date that "cabinet resolution", but does anyone else care to hazard a guess?
If the 1923 borders were defined by France and Britain defeating the Ottomans in a war than the current Golan borders are valid as well.
Wrong in the first line, I'm afraid. The borders were defined by France and Britain because the Turkish govt ceded all this territory to the "Principal Allied Powers" via the Treaty of Lausanne. Whereupon those PAPs appointed two Mandatories from amongst their members. It was that Treaty that made it legal, Chaim. So can you show me a Treaty that has Syria agreeing to cede the Golan Heights to Israel? No, I didn't think so.....
Should Syiria nor Israel keep those borders? Unless the parties recognize thmeselves as succesors of the empire?
One Palestinian Syrian managed to cross the border and get himself all the way to Jaffa, before giving himself up quietly. Was he a terrorist or just a Palestinian refugee? There are several million of those waiting to cross every border!
Israel is founded in 1947, remember?