Comment / Netanyahu's bid to split Kadima is pure corruption
The positions being offered to those who leave Kadima - for instance, in the Foreign Ministry (an additional minister) and the Public Security Ministry (a deputy minister) - are totally superfluous. They could just as well be appointed Minister of Nothing or Deputy Minister for Zilch.
By Nehemia Shtrasler Tags: Kadima Israel news Abraham HirchsonIn another country, with a higher level of morality and less exhaustion and despair, the masses would already have taken to the streets to demonstrate against the corruption.
Admittedly, the public did not take to the streets to demonstrate when Benjamin Netanyahu set up the largest, most inflated and wasteful government in the history of the state, a government with no functional logic, which has 30 ministers and nine deputy ministers, most of whom have jobs fabricated out of nothing, grandiose and unnecessary bureaus and ridiculous perks. The public put up with that without a murmur. But now he wants to expand this monstrous government by buying another seven Knesset members who are interested only in a luxurious office, a chauffeur and other perks!
Netanyahu's job project has no connection to ideology. It is all a matter of chair-ology. There is no diplomatic plan on the horizon that requires a majority; there is no new vision that requires people to rally to the flag. Nor is Netanyahu about to sign any withdrawal plan.
Therefore, this is not a legitimate desertion; it is very different from a split on ideological grounds or leaving a party in order to support a new diplomatic program, like the split in Likud under Ariel Sharon, which occurred due to the disengagement plan.
So far, we are merely talking about proposals that have been made to various Knesset members - Arie Bibi, Otniel Schneller, Ronit Tirosh, Shai Hermesh and Yulia Shamalov Berkovich, who only two weeks ago told me that she considers politics "a serious profession that must be studied before one talks." Shamalov Berkovich has served in the Knesset for a mere half year. Is it serious that she should already be appointed a deputy minister?
The positions being offered to those who leave Kadima - for instance, in the Foreign Ministry (an additional minister) and the Public Security Ministry (a deputy minister) - are totally superfluous. They could just as well be appointed Minister of Nothing or Deputy Minister for Zilch. In other words, this is simply crude, blatant bribery that is much worse than the public corruption of which Abraham Hirchson, for example, was convicted.
Hirchson was sentenced to five years and five months in jail for stealing NIS 1.7 million from the National Workers Organization's coffers. That is a personal, localized crime that does not have much effect on the general public. But when the prime minister hands out bribes - every minister and deputy minister costs the taxpayer millions - that is a corruption of the democratic system, contempt for the rules of proper governance and scorn for the voters' choices.
The result will be an even greater distrust of and repugnance toward politicians. From there, the road is short to a loss of faith in the entire democratic process. And that is dangerous.
Attorney General Menachem Mazuz, who took energetic, resolute action against Hirchson when he was down and lacked political clout, is nowhere to be seen when it comes to the prime minister. Justice Minister Yaakov Neeman, who is responsible for the rule of law, has no opinion on the issue. Education Minister Gideon Sa'ar is also keeping mum. He is the one who in 2008 submitted a bill on Likud's behalf to limit the size of the cabinet to 18 ministers because he was so shocked by Ehud Olmert's oversize government, which contained 25 ministers. But that is nothing compared to Netanyahu. Yet there was a time when Netanyahu boasted of how he gave the public a government of 18 ministers in 1996.
Since then Netanyahu has aged, and for the worse. He understands that "the public is dumb, so the public will pay," as Shalom Hanoch's song says. That is why we now see a prime minister utterly different from the finance minister we saw six years ago and the prime minister of 13 years ago. Netanyahu, from the moment he was elected, has betrayed all his principles. He has smashed the tablets of the covenant that he himself wrote. In fact, he has no principles, except the principle of survival.
Netanyahu no longer has pretensions of improving the economy. He has no pretensions of cutting the budget or carrying out important reforms. He has raised the child allowances that he himself cut and included the budget for yeshivas and yeshiva students in the baseline national budget, something he fought against in the past.
He has given Histadrut labor federation chairman Ofer Eini veto power, even though he loathes the organization. Eini's veto will make it impossible for him to carry out important reforms at the Israel Electric Corporation, the Water Authority and the ports.
Every morning, Netanyahu checks to see which way the wind is blowing and then decides which direction to take.
That is why he decided to cancel the drought tax even though he knows the water economy is in a crisis. That is why he canceled value-added tax on fruit and vegetables - because he decided to heed "the public's feelings." That is why he is maneuvering incessantly over the Gilad Shalit deal, because he has not yet decided whether a majority of the public supports or opposes it.
One thing is clear: The public is exhausted and in despair, so it will not exact payment from him for his corrupt actions. Netanyahu understood that the journalists would write a bit and the public would complain a bit, but in the end, everyone would forget - and he would remain, with his hold on power bolstered. The prime minister knows we will not go out to the city square and shout with hoarse voices: "Corrupt politicians, we're fed up with you!"
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
IT IS BY NO MEANS A MATTER OF CORRUPTION, IT IS PURELY AND SIMLY A CASE OF PROSTITUTION. IF KADIMA GOT THE MEANS THEY CAN BE BOUGHT BACK. WETHER IT IS WORTHWHILE TO DO IT IS ANOTHER QUESTION.
once they do it they will be much better off than ordinary likud MPs who followed their line and convictions asking nothing more than to follow and advance their political conviction (be it right or wrong). according to the new converts businness is businness always and political prostitution is not iligal anywhere in the world, so how much is it for a pass?
we all remember rabin-peres in 93 and many things before. left is much more corrupt, or it is ok to do by left and not by right.
The real problem is that people aren't paying attention anymore. Politicians are free to do whatever they want. Livni is seen as "weak" because she didn't want to join a government that's opposite to her own principles, but her Kadima partner are much more flexible. Society is sick. Good article, bookmarked.
...The female Olmert?? She'd have given half of Israel away by now. Gimme a break!
Klein: Nonsense? How do you know what Livni or any other would have made? She was offered to come into the goverment and refused. A mistake? May be, but she sticked to some principles. Gil: A prime minister is elected to lead, not to follow. According to your view there is no need of a prime minister, It is enough to make polls and referendums. Acording to polls 70% of israelis wand to exchange territories for peace, Why don't you ask Nataniahu to do the will of the people when it does not suit your opinion? Democracy is based on the supposition the leaders know better than their electors. When the good of the country is contrary to the will of the people, the leaders must choose the good of the country.
Israelis voted for Kadima, its ideas and its top people, not some members of whom most of us don't even know who they are. This is not America where ALL Congressmen are elected democratically. So, stealing some people from another party to beef up yours is actually an insult to the voters.
everything weas ok and the left loved it as it helped to pass the Oslo accords. The writer convenoiently forgot what Rabin did in 1992 to bring two members of the opposition in to his coalition so that he could get enough votes to pass the Oslo disaster. But then again the left has always had two standards
Netanyahu's corruption, if I understand the "analysis/expose", is that he is highly sensitive to public opinion, as opposed to doing the "honorable" thing by imposing ruling by fiat. Unheard of, a politician who responds to the will of the majority.
Corruption is enriching oneself using his position. Holding together a coalition in the rough and tumble system of Israeli politics is not corruption. Nehemia is mistaken and his entire screed is best ignored, unless he has something factual.
Stop whining! Given the circumstances Netanyahu is doing what any politician would do. Don't tell me that Livni would not be doing exactly the same thing were the shoe on the other foot! Puhleeze!