• Published 02:05 27.05.10
  • Latest update 02:05 27.05.10

Bibi or Tibi?

By Gideon Levy

Bibi or Tibi? Barak or Barakeh? Dov Khenin or Hanin Zuabi? Practically every Jewish Israeli would answer that question with an automatic Pavlovian response, without a moment's hesitation. Of course Bibi, certainly Barak. And even Khenin is better than his fellow MK Zuabi. Why? Because they're Jews.

Their worldview, opinions or even qualifications and performance don't matter one iota. The thought that an Arab citizen could ever lead the state is far beyond the boundaries of any public discourse in Israel. This is understandable, of course, in a state that wants so desperately to be completely Jewish and to ignore the large Arab minority. But it's impossible not to notice this axiom's shrill, disturbing tone. If it's true about the prime minister, it's probably true to a large extent in other aspects of our lives.

Somewhere else, one could and should call it racism. But not here. Here it's simply self-evident, and to hell with the definitions and implications. A black man can be the president of the United States, minority representatives can be elected to any post in many countries, even to head of state in some. Only here is this inconceivable, even in an imaginary peace situation.

The thought of MK Ahmed Tibi or someone like him ever being prime minister is the greatest, most horrible threat hanging over our heads. Worse than the Iranian bomb. This is the ultimate intimidation weapon against all Israeli Jews.

Eldad Yaniv provided an excellent demonstration of this in his op-ed in Haaretz on Tuesday. Under a headline that could only be seen as ironic, "Zionists are not racists," the creator of the "National Left" proved exactly the opposite. Zionists are indeed racists. In his piece, Yaniv threatened that "if we do not leave the territories ... Ahmed Tibi will be prime minister." A man who wants, justly and courageously, to shake the comatose left into action at any cost, in any way, has exposed the unsavory side of all Israeli Jews, both left and right.

Inadvertently, perhaps, Yaniv has proved that even among the Zionist left, it's enough to scratch the surface of the pretty talk about justice and equality to reveal the racism and nationalism. These sentiments prevail there no less than on the right.

Tibi, of course, will never be prime minister here, and it's doubtful whether he'd want to. His heart is with his people, the Palestinians. But the left wing, yes, the left, disqualifies him in advance. This disqualification doesn't stem merely from his opinions. It stems first and foremost from his origin. For even if Tibi supported the Greater Land of Israel and believed that the Israel Defense Forces was the most moral army in the world, even if he were wondrously gifted, he'd still be ineligible, unfit, disqualified forever and in advance. At least the right-wing racists don't hide their racist views. But the (national ) left is tainted with nationalism, too.

Is it even permitted to ask in these parts whether Tibi is more qualified than Bibi? Perhaps as prime minister he'd be less inactive than Benjamin Netanyahu? Perhaps he'd cause Israel less damage? Perhaps he'd bring on us fewer wars and less occupation? Perhaps he'd be more concerned about social justice for all the country's citizens? Perhaps he'd be more liberal than a nationalist Jew? Maybe the election of a minority representative would one day make society more enlightened? Maybe it would send an amazing message to the world and ourselves?

But all these questions are entirely irrelevant. Tibi is an Arab, and an Arab - talented, moderate and even an Israel-lover - would never gain our confidence.

Why? Because he is an Arab. Period. This is true regarding the position of prime minister, and it's true regarding the owner of the garage where we have our car fixed.

So let's all take the masks off. When we say "a Jewish state" we mean a nationalist state. For how else could it be described? Moreover, when we say Jewish state, we are denying the chance that it would ever really be democratic.

Democracy? Only for the Jews in this state. The possibility that an Arab citizen with "equal rights" would ever head Israel frightens us all, including Yaniv, more than anything else.

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 5. 36 35
    Caricature
    • B. Levy
    • 27.05.10
    • 06:58

    Gideon, I agree with you very often but this time, you missed a good opportunity to shut your mouth. In most Arab states, the President has to be muslim. It's written in the constitution. NEVER a Jew would be appointed prime minister or president in those countries. Even in moderate and liberal ones like Tunisia or Morocco (which according to you is an model of coexistence ) it's impossible. By the way, there are almost no Jews left in the Arab world. In Israel however, you still have more than 20% of the population which is not Jewish. Unfortunately, Jewish nationalism has caused the exodus of the Palestinian people, but Arab nationalism has cleared the Arab world from most of its minorities. Those who remained, like the Berbers in North Africa of the Kurds in Syria had to struggle to fight compelled assimilation. Gideon, it's a good to fight the occupation but don't try to replace Ilan Pappe. Don't lose your credibility. Me neither, I wouldn't like to see Tibi becoming prime minister. It's not because he's an Arab, but rather because if he were given the possibility, he would merge and delude Israel in a Palestinian binational state. However, I would be delighted to see an Arab Mk from Meretz or the Labour party (even if he's not a zionist) being elected Prime minister of Israel.

  • 4. 27 5
    Yaniv indeed mistaken, Israeli Arabs are citizens of State of Israel
    • Smadar
    • 27.05.10
    • 06:50

    and just because they speak Arabic in addition to Hebrew and English and are either Christian or Muslim, does not mean that they would not make a good political candidate for a Prime Minister in Israel. However, I would follow the Israeli Declaration of Independence of 1948 signifying Israel as the Jewish State nevertheless, providing equal citizenship and opportunities for all. If not, that's like barring the current Jewish Labour Minister and former foreign minister, David Millabun ( or his brother MP Edward Millabun), who might become the next leader of the Labour Party in England should he win, from ever becoming Prime Minister. He's known to be an atheist, of Polish Jewish ancestry and son of a prominent Marxist in Britain at one time. The Church of England, Royalty and the English political sphere are all associated historically in running the country. But we don't have to worry about this now, first make peace with the Palestinians and other neighbours as it's more imperative at the moment.

  • 3. 17 70
    It is Israel's Land so should be governed by an Israeli
    • Esther
    • 27.05.10
    • 06:16

    God gave the land to Israel.. READ Joshua & Ezekiel ONLY what God of Israel- Yeshua Messiah says matters.. NOT what man thinks..

  • 2. 37 12
    Actually Gideon, democracy is the ONLY thing the Palestinians can participate in equally, in the sense of one man-one vote, at least for as long as there's a Jewish majority.
    • oops!
    • 27.05.10
    • 05:27

    It's everything else that they're denied - rights, protection under the law, services, education, housing, et al. Otherwise, everything else that you've said applies.

  • 1. 64 25
    Which is why Israel won't annex the West Bank until more ethnic cleansing has taken place - it's the only thing that's stopped it!
    • Unsavory Echo
    • 27.05.10
    • 05:17

    A chore assigned to the settlement enterprise - which is why Israel continues supporting it in every conceivable way.