• Published 02:58 02.09.10
  • Latest update 02:58 02.09.10

Abbas has the will, and the way

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas remains a partner for peace, despite this week's terrorist attacks.

By Avi Issacharoff Tags: Israel news Mahmoud Abbas Middle East peace

In spite of Tuesday's terror attack and its tragic consequences, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas remains a partner for peace. Over the next few days we will, of course, hear the same old slogans bandied about: "There is no Palestinian partner," or better yet, "Yasser Arafat could have made peace but didn't want to; Abbas may or might not want to conclude a peace with Israel, but he cannot."

But the attacks, for which Hamas took credit, occurred before the Palestinian Authority has been allowed to take control of the Hebron area. One must also admit that the West Bank has recently experienced one of its calmest spells since 1967.

Those pigeonholing Abbas have overlooked a number of facts. Over the past decade he has displayed the kind of political courage Israelis can only dream of their own leaders showing. As early as the first dark days of the second intifada, Abbas was the only Palestinian leader saying openly that the violence must stop. In early 2005, on the presidential campaign trail, Abbas denounced Qassam rocket attacks from Gaza, affirming that they are tantamount to political suicide and hurt the Palestinians' wider interest. In the end, he won the election.

Abbas' control may not extend to Gaza, but in the West Bank he has engineered a revolutionary transformation. Lacking Arafat's much-touted charisma, Abbas has quietly, obstinately changed the very face of the territory. Along with Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad, he has created a new way of life for the Palestinians. The armed men have disappeared, and West Bank cities for the first time know law and order. And yes, the number of terror attacks against Israelis has plummeted.

During Operation Cast Lead, as Arab countries erupted in anti-Israel protests, the calmest place in the Middle East - even more than Israel - was the West Bank. In public opinion polls, meanwhile, Abbas' popularity has consistently climbed (the sole exception being his tepid response to the Goldstone report ).

Abbas may not be as popular as Arafat, but the latter always saw public opinion as a foremost objective. Abbas' status within Fatah is better than ever, and opponents to his leadership have failed time and again to unseat him.

Top officers within the Shin Bet security service and Israel Defense Forces have voiced similar opinions about Abbas' leadership, even if in the wake of this week's attacks they haven't done so publicly for fear of a backlash from the Israeli right.

Members of Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition, however, go one step further, getting hung up on Hamas rule in Gaza - or a single terror attack during an otherwise quiet period - to explain the stagnation of the peace process or their prediction of the failure of diplomatic talks. Israel must not find itself held hostage by Hamas, waiting for the Islamist group to agree to relinquish its rule over Gaza or stop terror attacks, before agreeing to sign a peace deal.

In word and deed, Abbas has made clear he has both the will and the way to make peace, but he can't do it under the terms the Israeli right is demanding. He can show flexibility over borders, maybe even over the right of return. But not over Jerusalem, just as Arafat refused to do.

The Netanyahu government must understand the price of ending the conflict. You want peace? Give Abbas the Temple Mount. Without Islamic sovereignty over what Muslims call the Haram al-Sharif, we won't have peace even a decade from now.

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 19. 16 3
    "Give Abbas the Temple Mount"
    • Jew
    • 02.09.10
    • 19:09

    The Temple Mount is the most sought after piece of real estate on the planet. To give it to the youngest nation on the planet just doesn't seem to make sense. However, the Jews, as represented by the Jewish State (the State of Israel) are also short-sighted if they think that they should monopolize ownership. If the Jews replace their current persecution complex with a more positive attitude, they would realize that in the millenium following the destruction of the Second Temple the Western and Middle-eastern worlds generally accepted the Jewish Torah's ideals and its concept of God. The western and middle-eastern worlds developed replacement theologies and created nations and cultures based largely upon originally Jewish ideas. The universal component of the Jewish mission has, in a major sense, been achieved. The Jews have recently corrected their severe national, physical and material deficiencies. So they now have the ability to negotiate with the Christian and Moslem World (Europe, the Middle East and the Americas) on the exact terms of shared sovereignty in Jerusalem so that all of the religions, cultures, nations and societies that derived from Jewish ideas and values may share the Mount and pray to our common God. As Isaiah states and as we repeat many times this High Holy Day season, "And I will bring them to My holy mountain and make them joyful in my house of prayer...because my house will be called a House of Prayer for ALL OF THE NATIONS". Such a generous approach by Israel, replacing its steadfastness that contributes to world conflict, will earn Israel great respect in place of its current reputation for selfishness, stubborness and arrogance. Such an approach would result in a huge Kiddush Hashem and be a big step toward world peace. Israel would become a true "Light unto the Nations" and thus fulfill the main religious/national duty for which the Jewish people were chosen in the first place. And Jerusalem would then become the Ir Shalem -- the City of Peace - that it was meant to be.

  • 18. 4 14
    What I Think is
    • Howard
    • 02.09.10
    • 18:13

    that you are an idiot. What incentive could there possibly be to give the palestinians the temple mount? Becaus ethey'll keep acting like beabies if Israel doesn't? How about you grow some balls and negotiate from a position of strength?

  • 17. 4 10
    an over simplified view to make Abbas into a peacemaker and Bibi into a peace breaker
    • zionist forever
    • 02.09.10
    • 17:53

    Abbas had to be brought to these talks kicking and screaming. Bibi said he wants to have bi weekly meetings Abbas rejected that idea flat out. Abbas has no credibility and he represents only a small number of palestinians anyway and his term as president was supposed to end nearly 2 years ago so he is not even in position to do any deals from a legal point of view. Abbas like Arafat has never taken peace talking seriously because he takes the attitude this is a list of demands you either agree to every single one of them or there is nothing to talk about. The palestinians have never been interested in negotiating just demanding and as long as they demand rather than negotiate we will never reach a deal. The problem with Hamas rule in Gaza for Bibis coalition partners is because they are firing rockets I don't know where you live Avi Issachcharoff but the residents on the residents of Sderot & Ashkelon consider it to be a serious problem. Of course to somebody who doesn't have to live with the threat of rocket attacks its not an issue is it Mr Issacharoff? You also cannot brush off the brutal murder of 4 individuals in one attack, 2 injured in another and probably more to come. The idea that giving up Temple Mount and its all over ia laughable. There are settlements & the settler movement has a very loud voice and not just in the Knesset. There is also the thing that can kill a deal and thats right of return. Thats a red line and even Israel left accept that and one of the reasons Arafat walked when Barak had already offered him Temple Mount was the right of return issue. Any palestinian leader who agrees to give up the idea of right of return will be considered a traitor and the demand will not drop. Even Arafat didn't have the muscle to drop that and survive. So come on if its just Temple Mount why didn't we get a deal in 2000 when it was offered. This is a totally over simplified article designed to turn Bibi into the bad guy and Abbas into the victim no matter what if and probably when talks break down.

  • 16. 9 6
    Abbas can't allow Israel to control borders
    • Peter
    • 02.09.10
    • 17:30

    He needs controls of the economy. Letting Israel control imports/exports is basically allowing them to stunt the Palestinian economy. Israel closed Gaza's boarders for years prior to tehir so-called withdrawal and Hamas takeover. They used security threats to stunt Palestinian exports.

  • 15. 4 4
    Another observation
    • Peter
    • 02.09.10
    • 17:01

    The West Bank was calm during the Gaza assault because Abbas undemocratically suppressed protests. That is not a sign of law and order as much as it is a sign of dictatorship.

  • 14. 7 1
    A few observations
    • Peter
    • 02.09.10
    • 16:59

    1. When people speak of calm in the West Bank. Do they even take account of all settle attacks on Palestinians or is such violence acceptable and should be ignored? 2. Abbas won the 2005 presidental election. He also had no serious opponent. Hamas didn't field a candidate.

  • 13. 3 10
    Israel will give up a few insignificants hills, and Abbas will sign.
    • Israeli
    • 02.09.10
    • 14:54

    Abbas will shut up all critics of Israel by signing the deal on behalf of all Palestinians. No more refugee complains, no more accusations of occupation, no more critics of Jewish-democratic state. All these will be waived by Abbas. Not a bad deal after all. And to think the left supported BHO and its Nobel prize...

  • 12. 18 18
    Abbas is Israels boy
    • Natallie Durson
    • 02.09.10
    • 14:07

    After he succeeded Arafat, Abbas couldn't even get the time of day from an Israeli official. He was ignored by all. It was only after Hamas was elected that Israel found a use for Abbas, giving him the attention he craved. Israel armed and trained Abbas Fatah faction in an attempt to stage a coup on the Hamas government. After this failed, Israel arrested most of the Hamas ministers, rendering the government ineffective which placed temporary power in Abbas hands pending his call for a new election. He never called for an election and eventually his term of office expired. Still, Abbas became Israel (and therefore Americas) favorite Palestinian. In Washington DC now, we have the Israeli leader along with a flunky of Israel and a cheerleader for Israel all conniving to make a "peace plan". Since there is no representative of the Palestinian people it is hard to see how they will accept the results, if any.

    • 7 13
      Very good Hamas propoganda
      • Lilly
      • 02.09.10
      • 14:49

      You are playing your role to a tee. Why don't you ask some Palestinians about the "coup" and then get back to us with the truth

    • 8 7
      Another Hamas groupie
      • Claire
      • 02.09.10
      • 14:54

      What matters is the future of Palestinians. The peanut gallery, who would love to see more Palestinians killed on the altar of resistance, are irrelevant

    • 5 3
      silly post
      • Vesuvio
      • 02.09.10
      • 15:09

      Palestinians know the truth - they live it every day. They will decide what is to their benefit and what is not. Agitprop from an outsider is irrelevant If you are a Palestinian who should declare so; if you are not your opinion and predictions are meaningless

    • 4 1
      Read up on vanity fair lilly
      • Peter
      • 02.09.10
      • 17:27

      A vanity fair article explains what happen in the Gaza coup and US's dirty role in trying to get Mohammed Dahlan to take over.

    • 4 6
      No wonder
      • Christopher
      • 02.09.10
      • 17:59

      Haaretz is such a fan of Durson. Like Haaretz, she too tows the Hamas/Hezbollah line.

  • 11. 10 1
    * * * * *
    • James Murray
    • 02.09.10
    • 13:17

    I give this article 5 stars! At last someone gives credit where credit is due!

  • 10. 0 0
  • 9. 5 20
    Temple Mount
    • GT
    • 02.09.10
    • 11:15

    Give away the Temple Mount? You're sick. The Temple Mount, like all of Jerusalem, belongs to the Jews. You're a shame. Read your Torah. Read your Torah. Read your Torah.

    • 11 1
      Whats more important?
      • Mike
      • 02.09.10
      • 16:32

      The Temple mount which can be the starting point of World War III or saving lifes? According to the Torah saving life comes before anything. So to hold onto the Temple Mount and cause more conflict, termoil and death would be against the Torah. God does not live in the Temple Mount, he is everywhere. He loves all his creations, so screw that sliver of land, lets make peace and live normal happy healthy lives. That would be the greatest observance of the Torah! -Just one mans opinion. No offense to anyone!

  • 8. 11 10
    Did you know PA gave an award to mother who raised murderers?
    • Chafeeka
    • 02.09.10
    • 10:50

    As direct negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Authority began this week in Washington, the PA gave an award to a woman for raising four sons who all murdered Israelis in terrorist attacks. PA Minister of Prisoners Affairs Issa Karake gave the “Shield of Resoluteness and Giving” to the mother of the Abu Hamid brothers, four of whom have been sentenced to life in prison for terrorism, in a ceremony reported by the PA daily Al-Hayat Al-Jadida and translated by Palestinian Media Watch. A fifth was killed fighting Israel in 1994. The woman was referred to by PA media only as Umm Yusef, “mother of Yusef,” and not by her given name. She was also referred to as “Khansa of Palestine,” a reference to the legend of a woman from the days of the beginning of Islam, who rejoiced when her four sons were all killed in battle. Umm Yusef Abu Hamid's sons all took part in terrorist attacks in which innocent Israeli civilians were murdered. Karake praised the Abu Hamid family as “a model of willpower and of the struggle for the independence of Palestine.” He was accompanied by other PA representatives and by representatives of PA "human rights" groups. Karake also visited the family of Ayyat Al-Akhras, a suicide bomber who murdered two Israelis in a Jerusalem supermarket in 2002. Al-Hayat Al-Jadida referred to Al-Akhras as having “died a Martyrs' death.”

  • 7. 5 8
    Right ON Avi The Death Squads include your peace partners
    • Zvuv
    • 02.09.10
    • 09:37

    It is a combined effort and they are playing games with your brains. These are just the precursors for something bigger. Just be alert and fully prepared for anything from the north, south and east. With 2 leaders outside the territory, fully occupied with Obama and his doomed peace talks, well that is an opportunity.

  • 6. 8 7
    "we won't have peace even a decade from now"
    • Cipora Julianna Kohn
    • 02.09.10
    • 09:35

    whether there is a piece of paper saying we have peace, we will not have peace for decades. a treaty, however generous to the palestinian side, will not eradicate rampant islamic terror.

  • 5. 9 2
    I could not agree more....
    • Ahmad - West Bank
    • 02.09.10
    • 09:34

    Well said

  • 4. 10 3
    We should elect Abbas PM of Israel
    • Bakshish
    • 02.09.10
    • 09:20

  • 3. 11 15
    It is amazing how one by one here at Haaretz who are sooo naive and blind my goodness Abbas can only agree to a treaty of Hudaybiya
    • Chafeeka
    • 02.09.10
    • 09:17

    When even the "moderate" fatah professes they never have & never will accept the Jewish state of Israel, with the PLO & hamas charter swearing to detroy Israel, what chance do you think that abbas would ever acknowledge the Jewish right to their homeland, Israel? If he did, how long before he would be assassinated by his own, like Sadat? It's that fear that will forever prevent him from signing a peace with Israel. He expected obama would hand him a state without having to make peace with Israel, and that is exactly what Obama would do if reelected. Abbas has only to wait until then.

    • 7 3
      Israel needs to get into the 21st century
      • Peter
      • 02.09.10
      • 17:40

      This Jewish State nonsense must accede to the reality of demographics. Israel is running a country based giving the Palestinian false promises of a state in return for not asking for equal representation of the Knesset. Palestinians are starting to see reality and I won't be surprised if they push equal representation in the next 5-20 years.

    • 9 2
      Assassinated like Rabin?
      • Ibrahim
      • 02.09.10
      • 18:38

      Rabin didn 't do squat for peace except talk about it, and he was assassinated.....clean your house, Chafeeka, start by giving up on the idea of forcing non Jews in the West Bank to live as second class humans.

  • 2. 12 6
    Thank you for an exceptionally pragmatic summation of Abbas' accomplishments and his political standing with the Palestinians...
    • See
    • 02.09.10
    • 07:47

    It gets extremely old reading all the BS and the propaganda that endlessly denigrates him and attempts to minimize his popularity, when in fact he and Fateh ARE favored over Hamas(almost 2/1)...even in Gaza!

  • 1. 33 12
    Abbas is a good man
    • pt
    • 02.09.10
    • 04:54

    His primary aim ha,s and is to improve the lives and future of Palestinian people, unlike Arafat who cared only about himself, and Hamas who will sacrifice any and all Palestinian common on the altar of their maximalist goals He has showed incredible strength and fortitude in standing up to all the simple minded and unfair criticism, mainly from the mushed brained Western leftist, and Hamas groupies, who have called him a stooge, a tool of the occupation. (They,like Hamas, will fight till the last Palestinian) He has had to walk a tightrope between the impossible to deal with Israelis, and the unfair Americans, and the duplicitous Arab leaders. He is improving the lives of the people of the West Bank and at the same time he has stood fast against giving in to an unfair final peace deal. It would have been much easier for him to play the demagogue, but I think history will treat him well.