WikiLeaks fiasco doesn't embarrass Israel one bit
There was no major discrepancy between messages delivered to Israeli press and those delivered to American diplomats.
By Aluf Benn Tags: Israel news WikiLeaks Israel USThe "Israeli portion" of the U.S. government dispatches that were revealed yesterday by the WikiLeaks website revealed almost no new details regarding the exchange of messages between Jerusalem and Washington.
The secret documents sent by the U.S. Embassy in Tel Aviv show that the heads of the Israeli intelligence apparatus and the defense establishment refer to the same talking points when briefing American bureaucrats and congressional delegations as they do when speaking to journalists and Knesset members.
|
From left, Gabi Ashkenazi, Benjamin Netanyahu and Ehud Barak at a press conference this month. |
| Photo by: Alon Ron |
There is no significant discrepancy among the statements made by Defense Minister Ehud Barak, Mossad director Meir Dagan and former Military Intelligence chief Amos Yadlin in speeches, before the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, in background talks with media commentators and the diplomatic conversations the held.
Thus Israel has no reason to be embarrassed by the leak, because there are no large gaps between what it said domestically and what it said for public consumption.
Dagan, Yadlin, and Defense Ministry official Amos Gilad are portrayed in the U.S. diplomatic cables as being at the vanguard of Israel's public relations efforts, as trying to convince the Americans that Iran is dangerous and that it does not behoove Washington to supply weapons to Arab states.
U.S. officials are not convinced by these arguments, and as a result they repeat their oft-stated stance.
There are no revelations that proved embarrassing, such as American acquiescence to settlement expansion, which would be antithetical to Washington's official position, or an Israeli statement of support for American dialogue with Hamas.
Kept out of inner chambers
WikiLeaks did not succeed in penetrating the most sensitive channels of U.S.-Israel relations.
Even after yesterday's revelations, we still do not know what was really said in the meetings between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. President Barack Obama, or between former prime ministers Ehud Olmert and Ariel Sharon during their talks with former U.S. President George W. Bush, or between Dagan and his counterparts at U.S. intelligence agencies.
Either all concerned read from their talking points during these meetings, or the U.S.-Israel relationship is really handled through avenues that have yet to be revealed.
The low level of classification and the lack of importance that is to be attached to these documents find expression in a conversation between Dagan and a White House aide, as cited in a cable dated July 26, 2007.
Seven weeks before the Israel Air Force reportedly destroyed a Syrian nuclear reactor, the American guest broaches the subject of Damascus' claims that Israel is on the verge of attacking Syria. Dagan lies to him.
"Despite the fact that Israel has no intention of attacking, said Dagan, the Syrians are likely to retaliate over even the smallest incident, which could lead to quick escalation," the cable read.
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
they've become desensitized to it
It is almost a miracle that Israel comes out smelling like a rose. All the bad things in the middle east and these leaks are almost like they were hand picked by the powerful to get a war started with Iran. Hey one has to wonder how this could be but then again how did one gut get hold of all these records? Amazing just like it was planned. I am not one of those that doubt official reports. If they say the twin towers fell because of the planes in 45 minutes then who am I to ask why building seven did not fall for 10 hours.
When nothing bad is said about Israel and LIEBERMAN, probably the least popular Israeli politician outside Israel, gets a shining review?
The Lebenon and Gaza destruction, the flotilla fiasco, embarrasing a vice president on a foreign wisit, counterfeiting foreign passports, trying to capture a Haaretz jornalist for exposing lawbreaking in the military, and an assanation plot caught on camera. Who needs Wikileaks when you can just make a fool of yourself in public?
No Embarrassment for Israel But lots for Israel's enemies. Given that no secret documents on Israel are leaking out, it rather makes one wonder who's really orchestrating all of this. ######################### Thanks Hugh. Your post says it all.
"Even after yesterday's revelations, we still do not know what was really said in the meetings between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. President Barack Obama, or between former prime ministers Ehud Olmert and Ariel Sharon during their talks with former U.S. President George W. Bush, or between Dagan and his counterparts at U.S. intelligence agencies. Either all concerned read from their talking points during these meetings, or the U.S.-Israel relationship is really handled through avenues that have yet to be revealed." - Haaretz// Is Benn sick today? He embarrasses himself with his "no embarrassment" comment (see my previous post), and here he shows that he didn't read about the source of WikiLeaks. What is being published was gotten from State Department cables. Conversations between the President and Israeli officials, or between Israel and the US Enviromental Protection Administration for that matter, are not included. It doesn't mean "different channels".
I'll simply note that Wikileaks has only unloaded a small fraction of the documents that they have already in hand. You have no idea what is in the rest of them. Even if this particular set of documents sheds no light on the back rooms of Israeli politics, you can be certain that future sets will. Expecting otherwise would be the height of naivete.
This time around, it seems Israel os absolutely on the winning side. Or, perhaps more cautiously, on the side of the few who are not embarrassed by the tsunami of leaks, specially in the Middle East. However, the revelations and the fact they happened will shift relationships somewhat, move them , and require time to readequate and for the dust to settle down. Whether that outcome is beneficial to Israel remains to be seen. What will the official Saudi discourse be from now on? Will it come out of the closet regarding its true stance vis a vis Iran, or will it try to mend relations with its shiite rival? Same with Egypt, Jordan, UAE, Bahrein, etc. What will the USA do now? Wikileaks entered post-modern history for better or for worse.
because Saudi Arabia and Iran have oil but Israel doesn't. Let's also mention that the cowardly EU has to keep the growing Muslim minorities happy and demonizing Israel comes handy.
"A 2009 American government cable released Sunday by the WikiLeaks website quotes Defense Minister Ehud Barak as telling visiting American officials that a strike on Iran's nuclear facilities was viable until the end of 2010, but after that "any military solution would result in unacceptable collateral damage"... Meanwhile, another cable shows that a 2009 claim by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that Iran was months away from achieving military nuclear capability was dismissed by the Americans as a ploy..." - Haaretz// It is clear to the US today, as was previously clear about Netanyahu, that Israel gives intelligence assessments based on the desire to manipulate US policy, not based on reality. This is bad, because Israeli official opinions can no longer be taken seriously. This is a real embarrassment, not the trivial one that comes when some difference between private and public opinions are exposed, because citizens know that they don't get the unvarnished truth, and for good reasons, but they expect that state officials conduct themselves according to the reality of the situation.
You and many others were chomping at the bit for these leaks to be a real barn burner for Israeli~US~EU relationships. Maybe there are more(worse) to come. So please wait before you get too depressed.
In any of those 'revelations.'
or pathetic.
Even the UK government were slagged off so i would be damned surprised if Israel is not in there at all. If they aren't any criticisms - however minor or trivial, then one would suspect the origins of the data because let's be honest here, some of the Israeli government are more fanatical the Iranians.
Those cunning Israelis once again managed to remove themselves from the Wikileaks!! Dear Welshman, do you really believe that Israelis are more fanatical than the Iranian government? Forgotten to take your pills this morning?
There are parties of BOTH sides who would love nothing less than a full war in the region so yes i believe there are fanatics on both sides. Maybe you should get some perspective on the matter and compare each countries behaviour of the past 30 years.
I know it sounds like the internet meme :D
what could we expect? 911 connection? 1000 of nuclear warheads?
One would think that the first 200 would be barn burners in order to tanalize for the next group. Maybe it will happen but for now sorry Jack... As well last month there were WikiLeaks that came out and were a small broohah. Now a month later I cannot even remember what they were about.
the palestinian authority refused ehud barak's proposal to take over gaza post operation cast lead. furthermore, without the presence of the idf in the west bank, it would fall to hamas. yet the obama administration has been relentlessly pressuring israel to make peace. obama needs to wake up and understand that certain realities cannot be changed.
... but those who voted in our catastrophic FM, who manages to foment ill-will wherever he and his minions tread.
parroting the doctrine of her beloved Vatican again
The pattern of engagement makes it very clear that Israel had no intention of toppling Hamas in Cast Lead, either that or the planners were living in cloud coo-coo land.
No worse than living a life or running a country based on biblical "prophecy."
if one is to believe american official claims, all of the weakileak material was stolen by one lowly us army private. the idea that so much material was available to such an individual is a huge embarrassment to the united states. nothing in the materials thus far released is of much surprise. we all know that iran is considered to be a major threat to the region and beyond. the material regarding turkey is more interesting and confirms the position of those of us who have claimed that turkey is no longer a reliable partner for the west, let alone israel.
... but completely disagree with your assessment of Turkey, which could have been a genuine ally of Israel, were it not for the current Israeli FM and his rabid minions.
The current Turkish regime ceased to be a 'friend' to Israel when it sanctioned the flotilla.
The Turkish regime ceased to be a friend with the Cast Lead massacre followed by chochem Ayalon's "low chair" treatment.
they cannot cope with the real world where their brothers export jihad around the world and are responsible for terror all over.
Wikilinks causes hardly a rumble in Israeli diprlomacy and actions.
Enen when he's got nothing to say! Even when even he can't criticise Israel! Even when the Aluf Benn bias can't find anything! Even after all of these, Aluf Benn shows his true journalistic talents my writing a pointless article about a non-topic, which says nothing. I wonder if he will try for a Pulitzer prize for this article. With Aluf Benn's inventive imagination, not even this would surprise most of us!!
So far zero ..... nothing, nada, zilch, ...all this in thousands of pages.... But Iran is hated by the entire world .... except, of course, by Haaretz's posters from abroad - the lovers of Ahmadinejad, and haters of Jews coming in legions during the night, when we sleep ....
... I have never met such antisemites as found on this talkback... they have a place here that gives them the FREEDOM to tell the TRUTH ... their truth ... which they don't dare to reveal, in their own countries.... Where else can they find such a warm safe place, friendly yet discreete ... I know your opinion in this matter.
If Benn says: " Seven weeks before the Israel Air Force reportedly destroyed a Syrian nuclear reactor.." Dagan's statement that ""Despite the fact that Israel has no intention of attacking" cannot be considered a lie, unless it is proven that Israel was indeed the attacker. The compliment that Benn gives Dagan, Barak, Yadlin, Gilad that what they tell our Washingtonian friends and what they tell the Israeli press , " There was no major discrepancy between messages delivered to Israeli press " is admirable and perhaps unprecedented.
At the time Dagan made the statement Isreal had no intention of attackin.... The intention to attack may have existed afterwards. It cannot therefore be said that "Dagan lied".
If Israel wants to learn the intentions of the Obama administration they do not need “leaks”. All one has to do is follow the writings of Prof. Rashid KhalidI and the Arabists in the State Dept and at the Council on Foreign Relations.
... also ungratious towards an important friend, to say the least of it...
Ever since Esther outed herself as a Catholic missionary, her attacks have become more vocal and antagonistic
There are better ways to “prove,” a word as subjective as any of the storytelling around the Wikileaks myth itself. The proof, always depending on who accepts the proof, and as is almost always the case, dependent on whether the press itself chooses to report it, which if Israel is involved, is more than a bit predictable itself. Lack of reporting potential Israeli complicity in Wikileaks, knowing AIPAC and Israel have the longest history of accessing classified information and, by far, the strongest agenda for leaking information, could be seen as conclusive proof itself.
Lack of tolarance to the fact that Israel was not bashed this time around, serves as "conclusive proof" to Mr. Tzunami that Israel was involved. Else, how were they not bashed? Mr. Tzamati, your run on scentences proves that a turmoil inside you is cooking about the fact that Israel was not bashed and is mixed with excitement to copy what comment 2 Mr. Hugh puff already said. Calm down. Wikkileaks are true. People risk their lives for it!
The Jews also created 9/11, the Indonesian Tsunami, AIDs, Homosexuality, STDs, viral infections, the man in the moon, the Bermuda Triangle, and did I mention Jew-drugs are responsible for Ahmadinejad's birth defect that causes him to look like a monkey?
It's a bit difficult to accept that the major Wiki information offers so much about Iran and so little about Israel
they say it all out loud. In truth, Israel's policy is quite an open one. A day after a trip to a country, everybody knows what the discussions were, give and take.
But lots for Israel's enemies. Given that no secret documents on Israel are leaking out, it rather makes one wonder who's really orchestrating all of this.
Israel has a free press . There is more self criticism in Israel in one day then amongst all your friends combined in a decade. You people need to lambast Israel to cover for the daily outrages commited by your friends to all and sundry arouind the world but mainly to each other. Nothing new under the sun is there.
I agree with your assessment. Reading the various articles I see that the usual suspects can't find Israel doing or saying bad and wicked things - therefore a new conspiracy takes root that Israel has scrubbed the leaks of any mention of its nefarious activities. Like Israel has the time or energy to do this - oh hold on a second I'll put all my world domination plans on hold!
Of course not. They were leaked to WikiLeaks by the Mossad, who filtered anything embarassing out of them. At least now the Americans now that Israel is NOT their friend!
And let's not forget that Mossad is responsible for both WWI and WWII too.
Why? Why not just not leak the material in the first place? There's NOTHING shocking concerning ANYONE. It's like discovering the true inner doings of the Masons.