• Published 02:15 17.08.10
  • Latest update 02:15 17.08.10

Park rangers tell gay couple: Family membership doesn't count for you

Israel Nature and Parks Authority workers refuse to let a gay couple with two children enter two sites, claiming the family's membership was for straight couples only.

By Gili Izikovich and Ofra Edelman Tags: Israel news

Israel Nature and Parks Authority workers refused to let a gay couple with two children enter two sites over the weekend, claiming the family's membership was for straight couples only.

"A couple is a man and a woman, not a man and a man," the cashier at the Banias reserve said, before finally letting them in. At another site a staff member refused to let them in and insisted they buy an additional ticket for one of the adults.

One of the men told Haaretz that INPA's subscription manager Dalia Peres, whom he contacted after returning home, told him the the worker who wouldn't let them in had "complied with regulations." At the same time she said INPA does not discriminate against gay couples.

Peres suggested having both men's names on the INPA membership card.

Last Thursday the couple went on a two-day trip to the north with their two children. One of the men has a family membership, which includes free entrance to a couple plus children to the INPA's 54 parks and reserves.

On the first day the family headed for the Banias Reserve, in the Golan Heights. When the men presented the membership card at the entrance, the cashier said they must pay for an additional adult because "a couple is a man and a woman, not a man and a man."

After arguing with the couple and failing to reach her superiors, she relented, and agreed to let them into the site without paying for an extra admission.

The next day, after a hike along Snir stream, a tributary of the Jordan River, the family traveled to the Ayun stream nature reserve. At the entrance an INPA worker, Nasser Mohamed, who said he was in charge, stopped them.

He told the man whose name is on the subscription that he could enter with the children, but his partner must pay for entering. "The subscription is for a man, a woman and two children," he said.

When the men said that was not what the card said at all, Mohamed referred them to the members call center, which was closed for the weekend. Twenty minutes later, after visitors crowded round the persistent couple, Mohamed consented to use his radio to consult his superiors.

The couple said he stuck to his guns even after the consultation and told them "there's no such thing" [as a gay couple]. At this stage they decided to buy another ticket for NIS 25.

"These incidents spoiled the rest of the trip and kept us awake at night," one of the men said. "Many kinds of families exist in this era, and not every couple is registered as such on its members' identity cards. That does not mean that couple is not a family. The worker told us he couldn't accept two spouses of the same sex. There's a name for that kind of behavior. It's called discrimination."

On their return home, he wrote a complaint to INPA about "the consistent discrimination, humiliating treatment" the family had been subjected to on the two occasions.

Avner Pinchuk, a lawyer with the Association for Civil Rights in Israel, said INPA's conduct was undoubtedly discriminatory and improper. As a public authority INPA is obliged to treat everyone equally. Its staff not only flouted administrative law, but broke the law banning discrimination in products, services and entering entertainment and public places, he said.

The law stipulates that no one operating a public facility may discriminate in providing services on the basis of sexual proclivity, personal status, race, religion, nationality, gender, origin, view, political affiliation or disability. Those who violate the law are liable to a fine of up to NIS 150,000.

INPA said yesterday they reminded all their site workers of the regulations. "Clearly the couple deserve a deep apology for the way they were treated ... a family subscription is valid for the owner and any partner he chooses to bring," an authority spokesman said.

Participants hold flags during the gay pride parade in Jerusalem July 29, 2010.

Participants hold flags during the gay pride parade in Jerusalem July 29, 2010.

Photo by: Reuters
  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 10. 3 1
    Israel Nature and Parks Authority
    • Gregg from Haifa
    • 18.08.10
    • 08:36

    As an openly gay person living in Israel, I can say that Israel is way open and aware of its gay community and has laws that are really advance (for such a retarded middle aged country). How can you explain, that I was fully given rights to live as any citizens here just on the behalf of sharing my life with my Israeli partner? It is true that this country has a long road to ride before acceding the state of perfect democracy but I think that on the gay matter it is still very advance...

  • 9. 3 2
    Are the US Religious Right and
    • Mark Lincoln
    • 18.08.10
    • 04:55

    The Israeli Religious Right wed? What is the obsession of both with fag bashing? Is the best reason they can find to feel superior that they are not homosexual? Or is it that they are both obsessed with some fertility cult? Then what about the children also deprived by the parks service? Here in Texas we have a saying "I don't care what the sheep do at night.' Libertarian I agree, but it also save a lot of hard feeling over nothing important.

  • 8. 9 15
    good
    • guy
    • 17.08.10
    • 21:42

    very good muslim, christian, jew...all agree NO to what they did in Sodom

    • 2 2
      Eh?
      • Avner
      • 18.08.10
      • 02:52

      So the story of Sodom is about gay couples raising children and travelling to nature reserves? In my edition of the Torah it's about rape and inhospitality.

  • 7. 14 4
    Equality Bites
    • Tanja Cilia
    • 17.08.10
    • 20:28

    This is disturbing on many levels; do Israel Nature and Parks Authority workers have gaydar? Did the couple have lapel badges identifing their sexuality? Was it something to do with their behaviour? Is it a woman that makes a family complete - meaning, if ten fathers and ten children are the only people on an outing (no mothers/ mothers at work, it does not matter) - would they have been refused admission, too?

  • 6. 15 6
    Discrimination In Israel
    • Yaakov Sullivan
    • 17.08.10
    • 18:45

    Israel has a long and dreadful history in dealing with its homosexual population. Its discrimination is especially vicious when Arab homosexuals are involved (as was the case here),

  • 5. 9 4
    Good news for Haredim
    • Binyamin Dissen
    • 17.08.10
    • 14:46

    Two men can bring their children to one of these attractions and by claiming to be gay, can get free admission.

    • 1 5
      i'm Haredi
      • Alan
      • 18.08.10
      • 09:40

      I'm Haredi and I would not lower myself to be called gay just to avoid paying. Firstly it's stealing. Secondly its a disgrace to be gay. Nothing to be proud of.

  • 4. 10 13
  • 3. 9 7
    Park rangers - overuled
    • London Calling
    • 17.08.10
    • 11:10

    what a great outcome, there are fouls worldwide yet the laws of Israel shine again. Headline should read LAWS OF STATE OF ISRAEL DEPEND GAY RIGHTS :-)

  • 2. 13 17
    Well
    • Mat
    • 17.08.10
    • 09:56

    While I fully support their claim to equal rights, if you go on holiday in occupied territory, don't expect progressive views.

  • 1. 18 8
    Fully agree with the couple
    • 17.08.10
    • 09:32

    Indeed, a gay couple should be recognized as a couple for such things. The INPA was clearly wrong here. It's good to see that at least they apologize. Maybe instead of paying 150,000 NIS to the state, they could pay 25,000 NIS to the couple, saving 125,000 NIS for the national parks and leaving everyone happy.