• Published 03:41 20.05.10
  • Latest update 03:41 20.05.10

PA upgrades boycott of settlement products despite Israeli warnings

Palestinian Authority upgrading its campaign against Jewish-made goods from the West Bank and Golan Heights.

By Avi Issacharoff and Chaim Levinson Tags: Israel news West Bank Israel settlements

 

Protesters burn goods manufactured in West Bank settlements

Protesters burn goods manufactured in West Bank settlements

Photo by: Archive

The Palestinian Authority has upgraded its campaign against products made in Israeli settlements, notwithstanding warnings from Israel.

On Tuesday, some 3,000 Palestinian volunteers, conscripted by the government of PA Prime Minister Salam Fayyad through a group set up by the Palestinian Finance Ministry, went from door to door in West Bank communities explaining the reasons they should boycott settlement products.

Each household received a pamphlet listing dozens of Israeli products that the PA has identified as being manufactured in the West Bank and Golan Heights, and explaining that purchasing them bolsters the settlements and undermines the Palestinian struggle.

The volunteers also warned that anyone trading in such items would risk being punished.

Many of the volunteers in the campaign, which has been ongoing for several weeks, are university and high school students. On the T-shirts they were given is a campaign logo: a finger pointing at the viewer, similar to U.S. Army recruiting posters during the World Wars.

The list of items is quite long, and the pamphlet includes photographs in order to make them clear to the Palestinians.

Among the companies boycotted are Shamir Salads, Kobi Burekas, Ramat Hagolan Dairies, Jerusalem Granola, Bagel Bagel, Mei Eden, Soda Club, Barkan Wineries, Ramat Hagolan Wineries, Rav-Bariach and Ahava Products.

Yesha Council fumes

For its part, the Yesha Council of Settlements responded angrily to the Palestinian boycott and joined a call by Israel Manufacturers' Association president Shraga Brosh to close Israeli ports to Palestinian exports until the boycott is lifted.

MK Uri Ariel (National Union ) announced that he is working on a counter-boycott and other economic sanctions against the Palestinian Authority.

"This is a hostile act on the part of the Palestinian Authority and its leadership," the Yesha Council said in a statement. "We must respond to this immediately and sharply, just like one responds to a hostile act."

Sources in the Yesha Council also noted that the boycott was a violation of the Paris agreement that regulates economic relations between Israel and the PA, "and Israel must use the money of the PA it holds in order to compensate the owners of the boycotted industries."

The settler council also called on the government to immediately announce that it would not participate in the proximity talks with a person - Fayyad - who "conducts economic terrorism against Israel as a strategic policy".

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 24. 42 3
    europe is ready to suspend the special trade agreement
    • labhras
    • 20.05.10
    • 14:23

    through which Israel exports some 27% of it,s exports to the EU. Well done those Palestinians --Israel has claimed for decades that if you adopted peaceful protest you would get somewhere --but now we see that any form of protest is a "Hostile Act" to these people who have no interest in making a just peace. Some of us have known this for years but at least more people are catching on.

  • 23. 33 4
    why does israel hold PA money? is this not apartheid?
    • palestinian
    • 20.05.10
    • 13:47

    Good job Salam Fayyad. We all support you!

  • 22. 63 3
    I live in Israel and I boycott settlement goods too
    • Sarah
    • 20.05.10
    • 11:39

    It is within my rights to protest the settlements, just as it is the right of every Palestinian and every other Israeli with a conscience. If we want peace, we have to stop pandering to these extremists, set a reasonable border, and move forward with a real 2 state plan. Stopping the settlements is the first step.

  • 21. 23 3
    Good Job!
    • Dubaian
    • 20.05.10
    • 11:12

    Keep it up. at one point theyre businesses will start loosing and they will find it not feasable to stay in such settlements.

  • 20. 28 3
    boycott
    • Sharon
    • 20.05.10
    • 11:10

    Good for them!! Too bad the settlers don't understand how ridiculous they sound!!

  • 19. 38 3
    "economic terrorism"
    • JJ
    • 20.05.10
    • 11:06

    the illegal settlement council calls the boycott of products made on stolen lands "economic terrorism". I like to know what they call the blockade of Gaza. I guess in Israel, the only democracy in the middle east, anyone who disagrees with you is a terrorist, including Chomsky. You should start calling yourself "Israstan",

  • 18. 53 2
    This has got to be a joke...
    • David
    • 20.05.10
    • 10:54

    ...or a new low for Israel. Israelis must be totally divorced from reality if they think anyone outside of Israel and US Evangelical churches believes any of this "economic terrorism" garbage. It would be simply pathetic if it wasn't so genuinely evil in its slander, and intent to legitimate the subjugation of fellow human beings. Shame on Israel.

  • 17. 48 1
    Presumably Uri Ariel and the settlers now want boycott against Iran dropped as well?
    • Michael UK
    • 20.05.10
    • 10:10

    So when the PA peacefully recommends its people stop funding the occupation and the settlers who are stealing Pal land, that's 'economic terrorism'. But when Israel leads a world campaign for boycotts and sanctions against Iran which may or may not be developing nukes and which may or may not be some kind of threat to Israel, that's legitimate? Time for Israel to grow up and stop whining every time somebody legally opposes its illegal occupation.

  • 16. 42 2
    Every time I think
    • EGB
    • 20.05.10
    • 10:00

    that a bottom has been reached in treatment of Palestinians, settlers or their surrogates reach a new low. Taking action of any kind against a captive people's decision not to buy their captors' products is scurrilous. The Goliath of Israeli military occupation is being defeated by simple decisions of the ordinary Davids of Palestine. Now Goliath is whining that David wants to injure him.

  • 15. 31 4
    It's about time...
    • Aboud
    • 20.05.10
    • 09:58

    We should have done this a long time ago!

  • 14. 43 1
    Well done
    • Wasseem
    • 20.05.10
    • 09:33

    Keep it up, boycott Israeli Settlements products. Boycott Divest and Sanctions, continue the non-violent resistance, continue the popular struggle. At the end of the day, we will survive, we will announce independence, and occupation will go to the garbage of history, then we will be free :)

  • 13. 35 3
    peaceful protest
    • haltheapartide
    • 20.05.10
    • 09:20

    When will the "pay backs" start by Israeli religiously fanatic Occupiers against this non-violent Civil Disobedience? Stop the land grabs! Stop the confiscation.

    • 1 46
      Blockading Gaza is a peaceful protest too then
      • Ilan
      • 20.05.10
      • 10:36

      It is may be non-violent, but I think that blockading Gaza isn't accepted as a legitimate response by Palestinians. So why should a a boycott on Israelis be accepted as legitimate either.

    • 25 2
      Wow, Ilan, I didn't know the PA Navy was stopping ships going into Haifa!
      • Michael UK
      • 20.05.10
      • 11:06

      I'm not really sure how you see a siege of a captive people, that doesn't even allow them to rebuild their homes, and is enforced by guns, tanks, and soldiers is non-violent.

    • 25 3
      JJ
      • Twisted logic
      • 20.05.10
      • 11:31

      you must be joking. The blockade of Gaza is causing malnutrition, poverty, drug addiction, and nearly a health crisis. No food comes in unless Egypt and Israel want it to. The settlement product boycott will leave settlers well fed, free to move, and they will not have to abandon their swimming pools, freedom of movement, machine guns. They can also sell to the rest of the world. You must be joking by comparing the two situations, I hope.

    • 26 2
      There is a difference
      • David from the Arava
      • 20.05.10
      • 11:32

      Ilan, can you see no difference between a military blockade (hardly a non-violent act) and a civilian boycott by the occupied of their occupiers?

    • 4 12
      What does the PA do to violators?
      • Ilan
      • 20.05.10
      • 13:50

      They punish them, meaning that their intent is to coerce by threat of violence or fines compliance. So where is the difference?

  • 12. 24 3
    The boycott.
    • Stephen (Geneve) Switzerland.
    • 20.05.10
    • 09:19

    The Palestinian Authority has no doubt steered itself on a collision course with Israel. This serves well for the right wing settler movement which grows as we speak. Even though, the silent majority of Israeli society may well applaud said decision, one can be sure that pressure will be exerted on the coalition to either downgrade current proximity talks or close down the port facilities offered by Israel to the PA. No doubt, the PA needs to unify its citizens in a common course of action. No doubt the PA believes that Israel is some sort of Apartheid State similar to South Africa in the 80·s, where the popular belief by many was that through sanctions South Africa capitulated in favor of the ANC. The PA no doubt has been influenced by certain "outside" groups. The PA no doubt has taken a serious decision, which shows maturity. The ball may well be in the court of Jerusalem, however it could well be returned in an unjust manner. Good day.

  • 11. 34 3
    what dose Israel want?
    • Mohammed Aghawani
    • 20.05.10
    • 09:04

    Honestly, what is happening to Israel ... It occupies more of our land, keeps the occupation, annex water resources, demolish our homes, confiscate our land, imprison kill and injure our people, control our movement ... and yet they want us to use their products?? what kind of Evil is that?? Please, didn't you get the message: WE WANT A FULL DISENGAGEMENT FROM ISRAEL.

  • 10. 37 5
    Economic Terrorism?!
    • Joker - Scotland the Brave
    • 20.05.10
    • 08:57

    The word terrorism is probably the most used and abused term in Israeli politics. Does anyone have a definition of economic terrorism? Maybe throwing an egg at someone also constitutes agricultural terrorism!?

  • 9. 27 2
    Non Violence protest
    • Taheri
    • 20.05.10
    • 08:08

    Boycott of products, mass disobedience, mass go to prison movements are the only methods which are effective. otherwise every other act of protesting occupation will make them declare terrorists

  • 8. 41 8
    Height of arrogance
    • RW
    • 20.05.10
    • 08:03

    poor little Israel is upset that the people they steal land from are deciding not to buy the illegal settlers products. Whay that's just tewwibble. Who do those Palestinians with no civil or human rights or self-determination think they are? Free people?

  • 7. 30 3
    "hostile acts"
    • AAA
    • 20.05.10
    • 07:04

    "This is a hostile act on the part of the Palestinian Authority and its leadership," the Yesha Council said in a statement. "We must respond to this immediately and sharply, just like one responds to a hostile act." Those darned Palestinians! If they keep this up, I think you should even consider occupying their country.

  • 6. 36 2
    Terrorism?
    • Anon
    • 20.05.10
    • 07:02

    Israel sure takes liberties with that word. A positive, peaceful action by the PA is decried as "terrorism". Boycotts have been a part of most struggles in recent history. Is Rosa Parks also an "economic terrorist" for taking part in the Montgomery Bus Boycotts? Have you ever heard of the boy who cried wolf? Eventually the world will see through the knee jerk spewing of slander and baseless propaganda.

  • 5. 46 3
    Ridiculous settlers
    • Michael
    • 20.05.10
    • 06:33

    So the settler thieves believe they are entitled to be economically-supported by the very people they've robbed? Could their logic be anymore perverted? I fully support this non-violent resistance against the illegal settlers--in fact it should have been done long ago. The settler land theft should not be rewarded.

  • 4. 65 5
    observation
    • potobac
    • 20.05.10
    • 06:05

    A primary laws of marketing is don't alienate your market. Certainly the settlers have worked hard on alienating the Palestinians. It would be shameful indeed (even for Israel) to penalize Palestinians for boycotting them by cutting off their exports.

  • 3. 71 4
    A marvelous illustration of the zionist mind-set
    • Johnboy
    • 20.05.10
    • 05:43

    "We must respond to this immediately and sharply, just like one responds to a hostile act." A rather laughable definition of "a hostile act" but, regardless, the correct response should be to urge Israelis not to but any Palestinian goods, and *NOT* to "close Israeli ports to Palestinian exports until the boycott is lifted". After all, the PA isn't BLOCKING any settler-made goods from export; it is merely urging its constituents not to buy those goods.

    • 29 4
      Which zionist mind set?
      • David from the Arava
      • 20.05.10
      • 11:28

      Don't let the settlers speak for all israelis and Zionists. We haven't bought goods manufactured in the territories for years, and as a Jewish Israeli Zionist I encourage the Palestinian boycott.

  • 2. 58 5
    great job
    • larry
    • 20.05.10
    • 05:34

    good for the pa i hope they stick with it and its a positive move

  • 1. 78 4
    democracy in action
    • Jim
    • 20.05.10
    • 05:28

    Israel's Shabak murdered three generations of the Dar Yousef family, then claimd their land as "unoccupied". This is legitimate buiness??? Boycotting settlement produced goods is picayune by comparison!, and a very democratic tactic.