Ministers: Netanyahu keeping us in the dark on peace talks, freeze
'We don't know where we stand' says Vice Premier Silvan Shalom, 'doing things without discussion is inappropriate.'
By Avi Issacharoff and Jonathan LisSeveral ministers challenged Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the weekly cabinet meeting on Sunday, claiming he was concealing information about the newly relaunched peace talks and the future of the settlement construction freeze.
|
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the weekly cabinet meeting in Jerusalem on September 5, 2010. |
| Photo by: Michal Fattal |
"We don't know where we stand," Regional Development Minister Silvan Shalom said. "Doing things without discussion is inappropriate. I don't remember such a thing happening before."
Other ministers complained Netanyahu was keeping the cards too close and wasn't briefing them about the negotiations.
The prime minister cut the discussion short at this point, but not before some of the ministers voiced support for his strategy.
"There's an understanding within the government that there's no point in starting arguments about the framework of the agreement with the Palestinians," one of the ministers said. "We understand the tremendous importance of the very fact that negotiations are taking place, and we decided to loosen the prime minister's rope a little to let him run the negotiations discreetly."
"All this is only valid until there are concrete agreements with the Palestinians that we need to approve, or decisions about the construction freeze," the minister said.
The peace talks with the Palestinians were relaunched in Washington last week. The settlement construction freeze is due to expire later this month.
At a meeting with Likud ministers later on Sunday, Netanyahu said he intends to run the negotiations discreetly and will not allow any media leaks while they are going on.
Israel announced on Sunday that it is considering calling off the meeting between the Israeli and Palestinian negotiating team scheduled to be held in Jericho on Monday, after news of the meeting was leaked to the press.
Diplomatic sources on Sunday accused the Palestinians of leaking the date of the meeting, and said the discretion on which the parties agreed in Washington was meant to prevent much more sensitive information from getting out. As part of Israeli attempts to conceal the meeting dates, there was no response regarding whether a meeting was indeed scheduled for Jericho on Monday.
Speaking at his party's Rosh Hashana celebration on Sunday, Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman said he does not believe the direct talks with the Palestinians would bring a general peace agreement.
"A general peace agreement is unattainable - not next year and not within the next generation," he told Yisrael Beiteinu activists at the Rimonim Hotel in Jerusalem.
"A general peace agreement, which means an end to the conflict, a lack of mutual demands and acknowledging Israel as the nation state of the Jewish people, is an unattainable goal. No historic and painful compromises are going to help," he said.
Lieberman said the goal should be a long-term interim agreement instead.
"We will not agree to continue the construction freeze," he added.
"The say [Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas] Abu Mazen is against terrorism and won't fight Israel. I agree but it's not enough, because he will never sign a peace agreement with Israel. At most, he'll threaten to resign," said Lieberman.
"But don't worry - Abu Mazen won't fight, won't sign and won't resign. This is why the only practical solution is a long-term interim agreement, and we can talk about that," he said.
Abbas himself repeated on Sunday that he will stop the negotiations if Israel resumes construction in the settlements. Speaking to PLO activists in Libya, Abbas said that if the freeze does not continue beyond the end of September, "there won't be negotiations."
Meanwhile, senior Fatah official Mohammed Dahlan called Netanyahu a "crook," according to the Egyptian daily Al-Masry Al-Youm. Netanyahu would destroy what's left of the peace process and bring regional destruction, the newspaper reported.
The Israeli prime minister is not interested in peace and wants to destroy the two-state solution, he reportedly told the paper.
The Palestinian Authority opposes the Israeli demand that a future Palestinian state be demilitarized, he reportedly said, adding that the Palestinians are not interested in planes or tanks.
Dahlan's aides later told Israeli journalists that his words were "taken out of context."
The Israeli and Palestinian leaders are planning to hold talks with U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in Jerusalem this month, U.S. officials said yesterday.
According to the officials, Clinton will be joining Netanyahu and Abbas in Jerusalem on September 15, a day after the leaders are scheduled to meet in the Sinai resort of Sharm el-Sheikh.
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
The Iranian threat is off the table ,the Prime Minster and Defence Minister are too busy talking peace amd shaking hands with Obama and Clinton,until bang Tel AViv has been nucleared by Iran . Then what Mr Netanyahu,will you still continue your peace talks .Iran is threatening Israel with destruction ,wake up Mr .Prime Minster and get your priorities right ,otherwise your nreglect of this risk will be your and our last mistake,because we simply will not exist ,
Clearly we are Left wing dictatorship
If Netanyahu can't deliver a settlement freeze he certainly cannot deliver peace. If Israel is so intent upon building in the occupied territories, they are not about to evacuate them. Obama needs the peace talks to be in progress for the November elections. If there is no settlement freeze in place, a real one and not some Israeli doubletalk deception, Abbas should deny Obama the opportunity to use peace fakery for his partys reelection bids.
It is not a time for peace not only for israel; more so for the palestinians, the arabs & islam ! Borrowing time is what time dictate and not only for israel but on the entire strategy of the middle east ! It is a matter of a very short time the middle east will see the changes that has never been seen before. It is time to borrow time and not only for israel ! As for the palestinians they have more problems today than israel. Only those who wait for time will be the winners in the coming days ! The pressure of Obama on israel is the sign how much the pressure on the u.s these days ! ,
I thought the same thing.
it is not known to many people that this peace summet and especialy the next month will be the most important time since oslo, did any one ask themselves why mubarak of egypt and abdullah of jordan attended the summit in washington, the arabs and islamic countries have united their stands at last and backed this as the last move, either a palestinian state on 1967 borders living in peace next to israel or there will not be peace in the region, mubarak of egypt is leaving his office very soon, and for a 80 million nation there will be a change and this change might be devastating for israel, netanyahu was messing around and wasting time in the beginning but now the time has beat him and he should be fast and strong enough to be the historical leader that all the world will remember for making peace, or israel will be a country with no secured borders and no vision of the future.
Bibi's Performance for Peace at the tghe States dept at the US, was just OUTSTANDING. NOW is the time to SHOW real LEADERSHIP. "This is the time to try and complete a PEACE settlement, between us and the arabs world." Palestinians went for the meeting because thier were restrictions on WB settlements constructions,now that they are, it is fitting that these restrictions be extended during these talks. If Bibi 's performance at the meeting was nothing but THEATRICAL, then he certainly deserrves an OSCAR for such SHOW. Time will tell which prize will be awarded.? NOBEL/OSCAR.
I think 'Bibi' Netanyahu is very weak. If Palestinians demand Israel must demand too. While do Israel and Netanyahu keep silent. Israel must demand that if Palestinian State will not be de-militarized then Israel will continue settlement after the due date. I can see that Bibi's weakness comes from Obama as the USA President.
...I could have a "field day" with that minister's comment about "loosening the Prime Minister's rope a little."
he now represents no one at all !!!
the likes of frustrated might-have-beens, such as Silwan Shalom, should let Bibi be and get on with the job...
Yes , Please keep it like that Bibi, And I am sure Abu Mazen will keep quite about this. Its very clear many dont want this peace to happen and they know it two. For Example Lieberman and Hamas. Something has changed I can tell and its for the better. : )
If the West Bank is a genuine success, it must be given increased autonomy and move towards statehood. Leave Gaza to decide what it wants. Jerusalem can have two layers of govt. -- local boroughs like London, Paris and NYC, plus a city council and overall security provided by the IDF.
No problem. Likud voters will remain faithful so long as they get tough, macho posturing from Netanyahu. He knows this. He knows his voters will never notice him giving away the store to the Palestinians. All they want is tough talk. So he will continue to talk tough and let Lieberman posture all he wants. Meanwhile in the background he'll surrender to every Palestinian demand. Then he will declare victory and his voters will love him. Likud voters...There's two or three born every minute.