Kibbutz Movement urging ex-soldiers to settle in West Bank
Goal is 'to keep state lands in the hands of Jews and provide security to individuals sent there by the state and the Kibbutz Movement.'
By Akiva Eldar and Chaim Levinson Tags: Israel news Israel kibbutzThe Kibbutz Movement is encouraging demobilized soldiers to join settlements in the Jordan Valley, according to a document distributed by the organization’s special task force on settlement last month.
Two weeks ago, the task force released a document entitled “Settlement in the Jordan Valley in areas under Israeli control,” stating that at a meeting with Jordan Valley Regional Council head David Lahiani that same week, a proposal was raised to designate a former army base as a potential new settlement. At that meeting, a date was set for a joint tour of the site, known as the Gadi army base, by military officials and Kibbutz Movement representatives.
The document states that the initiative is aimed at supporting residents encouraged by the government to move to the settlements, and to shore up the Kibbutz Movement as a major player in future political decisions over the status of the Jordan Valley.
Yoel Marshak, head of the Kibbutz Movement’s task force, said that six years ago his unit launched a project to settle kibbutz members in evacuated military installations near Yitav, a kibbutz north of Jericho, in cooperation with the Prime Minister’s Office. The goal, Marshak said, “was to keep state lands in the hands of Jews and provide security to individuals sent there by the state and the Kibbutz Movement.”
|
The Kibbutz Movement's Yoel Marshak. |
| Photo by: Nitzan Shorer |
At the meeting, a group of demobilized soldiers living in Tel Aviv were offered to join isolated settlements in the Jordan Valley, an idea they reportedly warmly embraced.
Contacted by Haaretz, Marshak said that due to the renewed diplomatic talks with the Palestinian Authority, he was reconsidering his decision to resettle the former soldiers at the site. Still, he has not expressed that he would reconsider his plan to strengthen eight Jordan Valley kibbutzim the movement established in the past in accord with the state.
Marshak said that as long as the government has not decided to evacuate the valley, settlement there must be supported. He added that if, however, a decision is reached to evacuate the settlements, his movement would respect the decision (this position is identical to that presented by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in reference to freezing settlement construction in the West Bank and East Jerusalem).
Marshak also heads a group of kibbutz members who have volunteered over the past few years to protect Palestinians from settler unrest, and recently led a joint demonstration with residents of the Palestinian village of Hawara against violence by settlers from nearby Yitzhar.
Former MK Avshalom Vilan, a leading Kibbutz Movement official, is a founder of the Bayit Ehad (“One Home”) movement, which is promoting a bill that would encourage settlers living east of the West Bank separation fence to move to its western side even before a final-status agreement is reached between Israel and the Palestinians.
A 2005 State Comptroller’s report found that Jordan Valley settlements created in the 1960s were built on “appropriated lands under Palestinian ownership.” Military officials said most of the Jordan Valley settlements and a handful of military camps − “thousands of dunams,” according to the report − were built on land owned by absentee landlords. According to common practice in the West Bank, these lands are transferred to the control of authorities responsible for state property in the Civil Administration, and the state is not authorized to use them for settlement purposes.
In contrast to unauthorized outposts elsewhere in the West Bank, in which land appropriation is generally conducted by private individuals, in the case of the Jordan Valley settlements this has generally been done by government ministers, high-ranking state officials and the World Zionist Organization’s settlement department.
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
It's ironic and sad that the movement that was so instrumental in settling and building Israel, has given up that dream and even betrayed the very ideals for which it fought for so long. The only difference between the Kibbutzim and the "settlements" is a few decades, so it would make perfect sense if the Labor Party was in the FOREFRONT of the settlement enterprise. Unfortunately, we all know that is not the case, but this is a refreshing step in the right direction...
And the world is supposed to believe that the Israelis are serious about peace?
the prospect of living in the lands of our ancestors is impossible to resist.from chaucer's btitain to this day we have been treatedly abominably by the gentiles.but now.now we are in our own land.how can we not be happy to be here.
October 1995, must be seen in the widest possible way and it must remain under Israel's rule. Rabin was a prince of peace and a pragmatist at the same time. I see no reason at all why we shouldn't settle the Jordan Valley and hold it as part of Israel. This is part of both Zionism as well as the Kibbutz Movement.
what a beautiful piece of news.
People are always surprised when they hear that there are those of use kibbutznikim who support the Jews of Judea and Samaria. It was our movement that established the Jordan Valley communities, and there are other kibbutzim like Rosh Tzurim and Migdal Oz in Gush Etzion. Many of our friends in the moshavim in the Galilee also support the Jewish settlement of Judea and Samaira- because they are part of our land. Anyone who has ever picked up a Bible (and I am not religious) or history book can understand that.
You see what suits you and remain blind to what desturb your plans.
Even if (unlikely) Pals get their state in WB, somebody has to have the vision and means to keep order. Who is going to do that? Have you ever been in an Arabic country? Chaos. It is the result of the organization of society along tribal, rather than national ideals.The Arabs would be wise to allow the ex-IDF to keep house.
I was just reading about German settlement practices in West Prussia and the Warthegau. Same thing. German claims to ownership were more recent, of course.