• Published 04:06 12.07.10
  • Latest update 04:06 12.07.10

IDF to blame navy in scathing report on Gaza flotilla raid

Military probe to accuse navy of failing to prepare for violent resistance when boarding Gaza-bound aid ships.

By Tomer Zarchin, Avi Issacharoff and Amos Harel Tags: Israel news Gaza flotilla

An Israeli military report to be released Monday on the Israel Navy's deadly May raid on a Gaza-bound flotilla is expected to accuse the navy of failing to sufficiently consider the possibility that the commandos would encounter violent resistance when attempting to keep the ships out of Gaza.

The report is also expected to criticize the navy for not cooperating sufficiently with the Mossad in gathering information ahead of the flotilla's arrival and to discuss the process by which the raid was approved. It is not, however, expected to call for disciplinary action against particular officers.

 IDF chief Gabi Ashkenazi and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

IDF chief Gabi Ashkenazi and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

Photo by: IDF spokesman

Nine Turkish pro-Palestinian activists were killed in the May 31 raid after they used clubs and knives to attack Israel Navy commandos boarding the Turkish-flagged Mavi Marmara. Israel had previously warned that it would take over the ships to enforce its blockade of the Gaza Strip.

The Israel Defense Forces committee investigating the raid, headed by Maj. Gen. (res. ) Giora Eiland, is the first to complete its investigation. The Turkel Committee, appointed by the government to examine whether the raid adhered to international law, has just begun its investigation. A team from the State Comptroller's Office will be beginning its own probe of the flotilla raid shortly.

Meanwhile, the Israel Navy is preparing to block a Libyan ship carrying humanitarian aid to the region, although sources in the IDF say chances are good that the ship will sail to the Egyptian port of El-Arish. But Yousef Sawani, who heads the Gaddafi International Charity and Development Foundation, the group that chartered the ship, said the passengers do want to reach Gaza and that reports that they are going to dock in El-Arish are intended to harm morale. He said the group was a global institution, not a Libyan one.

Witnesses and various other people who have spoken to Eiland say that his report will be very critical of the army's conduct in the affair. Eiland is also reportedly critical of the government's conduct, but the report will not cover politicians.

Eilan may, however, mention the government's conduct in the press conference he has called for today. The briefing may also be the place to mention the actions of specific people with regard to the affair, if he does not mention them in his report.

It is believed that Eiland is not likely to call for action against individuals involved in the affair because of his record on such things in the past, particularly his report on the abduction of soldier Gilad Shalit four years ago.

Eiland is expected to focus his attention on specific institutions - the navy and its intelligence branch, Military Intelligence, without specifically recommending action against the officers who head these bodies.

The navy is to be the main target of Eiland's critique of the operation, although his assessment will apparently be tempered by consideration for the navy's success in several operations in recent years under Maj. Gen. Eliezer Marom.

The Turkel Committee is expected to make use of Eiland's conclusions as a jumping-off point for its investigation of the government's conduct during the affair.

If the findings of Eiland's committee and other evidence indicate that soldiers may have committed criminal offenses or war crimes, the military advocate general will be informed, and will then decide whether to open a criminal investigation, the State Prosecutor's Office informed the High Court of Justice yesterday.

The prosecution issued the statement ahead of this morning's High Court hearing of a petition by the Israeli peace group Gush Shalom, which is protesting the government's decision to appoint the Turkel Committee to investigate the flotilla raid. The petitioners want a state commission of inquiry to be established that would probe all aspects of the IDF's action with regard to the Gaza flotilla, including the decision making that preceded the raid. They also want the committee to have the authority to question soldiers involved in the incident.

"A situation in which after every operation soldiers have to testify before a civilian committee, and when the feeling created is that the soldiers should hire lawyers when they embark on an operation, harms the soldiers' ability to function and the ability of the army to fulfill its duty," the prosecution said in a statement. "In extraordinary cases, in which there is no choice, it is done. But as a rule, this is to be avoided so as not to impair the army's ability to carry out its duty."

The prosecution said it is up to the government to decide on the way the raid should be investigated. It said the Turkel Committee will have the authority to question soldiers and other members of the security forces regarding their responsibilities, but not to ask them about primarily military issues. The committee will also be able to ask Defense Minister Ehud Barak and IDF Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi about international law as it applies to the raid.

 

 

 

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 16. 15 2
    Say the truth on Flotilla
    • Bingo
    • 12.07.10
    • 16:48

    Its wrong to claim the Israeli commandos were attacked by Knives and clubs by innocent activists. How can a sane person try to justify first degree murder like this? Its in bad taste to lie to the public!

    • 1 2
      The truth is out there...
      • Ali
      • 13.07.10
      • 02:28

      You just refuse to acknowledge it. The evidence shows that you are wrong to claim the "activists" were innocent. We know this to be true; there is video, testimony, etc., etc., as tangible proof that at least a few of them had violent goals. How can a sane person continue to justify ignorance of the facts at hand? It's in bad taste to lie to yourself, or at least to ignore the evidence!

  • 15. 22 4
    God witnessed it also...
    • Azeri man
    • 12.07.10
    • 10:56

    You know your truth, we know our truth. As a human being sometime we can hide our truth, sometime we expose our truth depends on the intention. But one thing is inevitable that God witnesses it all. He also witnesses that Palastinians' home land become prison for them, what a shame on civilized nations ignoring this. Mid-east is like a sinking ship everybody on board. Simple solution is Peace and that repairs the ship for long journey.

  • 14. 14 2
    God witnessed it also...
    • Azeri man
    • 12.07.10
    • 10:56

    You know your truth, we know our truth. As a human being sometime we can hide our truth, sometime we expose our truth depends on the intention. But one thing is inevitable that God witnesses it all. He also witnesses that Palastinians' home land become prison for them, what a shame on civilized nations ignoring this. Mid-east is like a sinking ship everybody on board. Simple solution is Peace and that repairs the ship for long journey.

  • 13. 41 5
    Any threatening materials for Hamas?
    • Anne
    • 12.07.10
    • 10:44

    Have anybody seen any articles or something else, which have proved that there were some "arms" or any threatening things to be imported to Gaza? This ship was attacked before it was not even proved to be so.

  • 12. 32 3
    UN report on gaza Raid
    • Elise
    • 12.07.10
    • 09:06

    ISrael bad, nine dead protesters good. The end.

  • 11. 3 34
    and this is the non-independent inquiry not created as a result of a UN resolution
    • a reader
    • 12.07.10
    • 08:43

    How the world can repeat as a mantra that israel is not capable/able to conduct a proper investigation is beyond me. Israel is not perfect but one thing it IS good at, is holding their leaders to account (remember vinograd?).

    • 21 4
      dream on
      • John
      • 12.07.10
      • 09:50

    • 7 13
      to John: anything of substance to say?
      • a reader
      • 12.07.10
      • 10:17

      are just too blinded by anti-israel sentiment to recognize the basic truth that Israel can actually get something right on occasion?

    • 21 1
      Umm
      • O
      • 12.07.10
      • 10:22

      Did you happen to notice that there is expected to be a complete lack of any blame laid on any person? Internationally people tend to think that if mistakes have been made, they were usually made by someone, they don't just appear out of thin air. People need to be held responsible. "Sanctions" along the line of "[military institution X] could you please do things a little differently next time, k thx" are not exactly what is expected from a proper investigation. You may also note that the expected results of this "investigation" disregard the question of whether the IDF was allowed to do the boarding in the first place, it just asks if the boarding was conducted in the best possible way.

    • 6 5
      to O
      • a reader
      • 12.07.10
      • 10:43

      i can concede somewhat. however, by singling out specific branches of the army, the inquiry is effectively laying blame on the leadership of that branch (navy, mossad). Whether the IDF was allowed to do the boarding will be addressed during Turkel's investigation. This was not a broad inquiry but an internal military one. It fulfilled its mandate well. Its ok for you to admit it too. It won't make you pro-Israel, just intellectually honest.

    • 3 3
      Repeating the mantra
      • Anne
      • 12.07.10
      • 16:31

      Maybe the investigation now as a result of the international pressure is more objektiv than so many times before. Also the result of the investigation will be judged very carefully by the "outsiders". It will not be enough to give the answer that it was ONLY "the operational mistake". People are crying loudly for Shalit ( hope he will be released) but hey do no know know any mercy for those killed people who also "defended" themselves and it has not yet been told if they they have been quilty of something else (f.e importing arms or materials for them)

    • 12 0
      Given Israel’s propensity for...
      • P
      • 12.07.10
      • 16:52

      ...whitewashing, denial and refusing to hold Israeli soldiers accountable in situations where they are so far out of line it is ridiculous? This actually makes me wonder how much worse the situation really is when they actually fess up to doing something wrong.

    • 0 6
      Given Israel’s propensity for...
      • Laszlo Yarkony
      • 12.07.10
      • 18:13

      Has ANY military conducted an enquiry against hersel? USA, French; English, Spanish? And on Arab Armies we are not talking at all.

    • 0 1
      Then call UN inquisitor Goldstone, he won't deceive your expectations.
      • Meo
      • 12.07.10
      • 22:29

      Obviously,you want to hear the truth that suits your need and Goldstone and his team that was selected for their criticism of Israel will do exactly that.They will blame Israel as they blamed it before Goldstone gave them the chance to repeat it in the name of inquiry.

  • 10. 59 11
    I don't get it
    • Jerrold Cohen
    • 12.07.10
    • 08:22

    Is Israel so afraid of truth that it is psychotic? There is abundant testimony from activists aboard the Mavi Marmara and ships close to it that Israel sprayed the Marmara with gunfire before soldiers came down from helicopters. People were killed. That is murder, pure and simple. There is abundant witness testimony to the effect that several unarmed Turks were shot in front of witnesses through the head, one bullet, killed, gangland style. Now THAT is a problem that no one seems to be addressing. As for the presence of bars and knives among the Turks, what did you expect when you murdered a few of them before boarding?

    • 8 36
      Blah blah blah
      • Levi
      • 12.07.10
      • 09:36

      We all seen the videos and not one video about this spraying of bullets. We also saw the videos about Jihad on the boats. Give it a rest. Don't send ships into closed military areas.

    • 11 15
      I don't get you
      • Ali
      • 12.07.10
      • 09:52

      I'm not sure about you, "Mr. Cohen", but I find tangible evidence to be much more persuasive and to portray the actual truth much more frequently than I do the testimonies of inherently biased and overtly agenda-driven participants. Evidence, reason, and objectivity is much more reliable than selected witness testimony,

    • 27 1
      No, we did NOT see the videos
      • Doug
      • 12.07.10
      • 11:03

      The IDF confiscated them, then edited together a few fragments.. If you want to see the videos, join in on the damand that the IDF release them all, undedited.

    • 1 14
      Yes we CAN see the videos!
      • Olah
      • 12.07.10
      • 15:41

      A journalist on board uploaded an hour long video to Youtube which clearly shows the Turks arming themselves in advance and discussing how they're going to throw the soldiers overboard. It also clearly shows the ship being sprayed with PAINT from paintball guns and this is confirmed on the video by another journalist on board. Of course, anyone who simply wants to rearrange their prejudices is free to ignore the facts - I realize they can be upsetting when they don't agree with what you've already decided.

    • 2 6
      Evidence
      • Laura
      • 12.07.10
      • 19:18

      I've watched every scrap of video from the flotilla that I can find, and I have not seen or heard any evidence that anything except paintballs were shot at the ship before the commandos rappelled onto its deck. I"m skeptical of the flotilla participants' testimony for several reasons, but here is the main one. All said that there intentions were entirely peaceful. But there own video footage clearly shows that their intent was to foment a crisis, to throw any Israelis who boarded the ship into the sea, and to become martyrs in their effort to reach Gaza. None of them, even after the fact, was willing to admit that some among them may have had non-peaceful and non-humanitarian goals. Those who swore that real bullets were fired from the helicopters were in no position to see what went on. So nothing they say is credible. BTW a bullet recovered from the leg from one commando was not from an IDF gun, and the ship's captain said that the flotilla agitators had thrown weapons overboard before the IDF had secured the entire ship.

  • 9. 28 1
    So no "bucks" stop at the Defense Minister - again
    • DT
    • 12.07.10
    • 08:08

    So Barak gets away again scot free. We have the Lebanon "retreat", Cast Lead and now this. We don't need "Teflon incompetance at the top". Heaven help us in the next war. "Another half job by a half wit"

  • 8. 23 1
    But everybody who was anybody was out of the country
    • Esther
    • 12.07.10
    • 07:22

    when this occured, and not one of them thought it necessary to come home and conduct the crazy enterprise on the Turkish ships... everybody did what he felt like, the deputy PM slept through it all, most of the others were apparently unconcerned...

  • 7. 6 2
    MP and all Soldier Israel will enter into fire
    • jesus
    • 12.07.10
    • 06:53

    On Gods....

  • 6. 70 2
    Barak Should be Blamed
    • Paul
    • 12.07.10
    • 06:40

    He was the one who gave the final go ahead, Barak should be fired

  • 5. 100 3
    And who ordered that idiocy?
    • Mark Lincoln
    • 12.07.10
    • 06:35

    I see, it is the Navy and not the men who gave the orders to commit idiocy to the Navy. How familiar this sounds. The men who give the orders are eager to blame the men who carried them out. How convenient! How simple! How damning of the Netanyahu government, especially Bibi and Barak. . . . Or, did they not give the orders? Oh! I get it, the NAVY demanded that it be ordered to commit folly! Shame on it. Get real, the orders of Netanyahu and Barak were so idiotic that they now have to blame the Navy.

    • 5 14
      no basic understanding of how inquiries work
      • a reader
      • 12.07.10
      • 09:13

      this is an internal "Israeli military" investigation whose mandate is to evaluate the performance of the IDF. It's mandate did not extend to the political echelons. The "big picture" inquiry will by Turkel's job. If you weren't so eager to blindly criticize, you might have caught this very simple distinction.

  • 4. 99 3
    really now...
    • wtf
    • 12.07.10
    • 06:29

    they raided a ship in international waters and didn't expect the people onboard to fight back? the report is right--higherups in the navy clearly have no sense of reality.

  • 3. 7 96
    Should have used MORE Force SOONER
    • UsedToPostHere
    • 12.07.10
    • 06:19

    Paintball Guns were clearly not adequate for subduing these mercenaries. Should have started shooting sooner so as not to give the Terrorists a false sense of confidence.

    • 49 6
      "Mercenaries and terrorists"?
      • JS
      • 12.07.10
      • 06:59

      They were on a civilian vessel in an international body of water. They were illegally raided and under law had the right to defend themselves against illegal search and seizure. Your need to prove yourself through violence is so disturbing to me.

    • 7 22
      JS, Use Your "Illegal Search & Seizure" BS Line Against The Somali Pirates
      • Lavi - Seattle
      • 12.07.10
      • 10:32

      At least in that case you'd be right. However, here you're trying to justify the right for Islamic shahids to attempt and break Israel's blockade of a violent Hamas in a war zone that's bent on Israel's destruction. If the flotilla was successful, then the top "aid" would not be rice and medicine but even more deadly weapons for Hamas's use in the next round. Now, tell me you didn't know that already.

    • 3 12
      Do real peace activists punch, kick, and stab?
      • utagawa
      • 12.07.10
      • 16:31

      Whether they were in international waters or not, whether Israel had a right to do what it did or not is not the point. Real peace activists like MLK or Mahatma Gandhi never, ever, ever beat, punched or kicked any of their attackers. And that's why they were so effective and respected. The Turkish perpetrators on this boaat were certainly no Martin Luther Kings.

    • 1 2
      Terrorists are Civilians when Out of Uniform?
      • UsedToPostHere
      • 13.07.10
      • 04:19

      Armed lunatics ranting about how they want to martyr themselves to kill Jews, trying to charge a Justified blockade, hoping to write propaganda with their blood and smash in the brains of their enemies, deserve to die. They can have their paradise in death and we can live and everyone will be happy.

  • 2. 131 4
    Let the finger pointing begin
    • TJ
    • 12.07.10
    • 05:53

    A failed institution scrambling to maintain its legitimacy. Operation Cast Lead, the Lebanon Offensive, now this. How much longer will it take for the government to realize that the boot its crushing the Palestinians with is starting to wear out?

  • 1. 9 95
    Theater of Absurd - Kafka Would Be Proud.
    • massaraksh
    • 12.07.10
    • 05:50

    Neither Navy nor Army bears any responsibility for this terrorist act - the IHH, Turkish government, and the European Leftists do. One doesn't have to be a brain surgeon to understand that. Unfortunately, it looks like the Israeli political and intellectual elites have completly lost their mind and would do anything to satisfy the so-called "world community's" demands. It's been long overdue to tell them that enough is enough.