• Published 01:13 19.03.10
  • Latest update 05:40 19.03.10

Haredi lobby pressures gov't into scrapping animal fur ban

By Cnaan Liphshiz Tags: Israel news

The Knesset this week moved to scrap a bill that would ban fur, amid pressure from leading Canadian furriers who lobbied here with local ultra-Orthodox leaders against the precedent-setting legislation, Haaretz has learned.

The leader of Israel's anti-fur lobby, an immigrant from France, reacted by saying that by scrapping the bill - which would have made Israel the first nation to outlaw the fur industry - Jerusalem "missed a chance" to win liberal minds in the West. Lobby members have vowed to launch a campaign to revitalize the legislation.

The decision to shelve the proposed legislation came at the end of a discussion by the coalition's coordinating body, presided over by MK Zevulun Orlev (Habayit Hayehudi). He said he "personally supports" the bill, but cannot promote it because of opposition by MK Menachem Eliezer Moses (United Torah Judaism), a coalition member.

"I have no interest in offending the Haredi public," Orlev said.

The bill sought to ban trading, producing and processing fur in Israel except for religious purposes - a stipulation designed to accommodate the needs of the Haredi community, some of whom traditionally wear sable on their hats.

Moses opposed the bill despite the exception, explaining it could affect kosher slaughter abroad. Shas also opposed it.

"I'm pleased to see that common sense has prevailed," Alan Herscovici, executive vice president of the Fur Council of Canada, told Anglo File after his whirlwind visit to Israel last week, in which he lobbied against the bill.

"This ban would have very little impact on Israel's own economy," the Canadian trade union leader said, "but would have had grave ramifications elsewhere."

The scrapped bill already passed its first of three readings in the Knesset prior to Herscovici's visit, triggering no vocal opposition from ultra-Orthodox Knesset members.

Herscovici, who is Jewish, said he came to Israel with another colleague from Canada because he was concerned the Knesset "might find the bill to be an easy cookie," adding: "It might be easy to pass laws when the people you're hurting live far away and don't vote in your country."

Canada's Ministry of International Trade last month sent its Israeli counterpart a letter warning against the fur bill and expressing concern that it might prejudice Canadian fur trade interests or World Trade Organization obligations. It also stressed Canada and Israel's long-standing relations and shared democratic values and commitment to free trade.

According to the International Anti-Fur Coalition - an umbrella organization of groups in 60 countries - Israel has a tiny $500,000 share in the world's $16 billion annual fur industry.

The figures for Israel include synthetic fur. Canada - where Jews made up nearly half of those involved in the fur trade in the 1930s - is one of the leading countries in the field, with annual sales of roughly $500 million.

The Israeli fur bill, Herscovici said, was being promoted here by non-Israeli pressure groups "because it's easier to push through here" by people who "are hoping to throw it back to other countries as a precedent."

But Israel "should be the last to proceed with this kind of legislation," Herscovici said, because Israel "is being demonized and delegitimized in the West in the same way that the fur industry is being demonized - and often by the same people and circles."

The founder of the International Anti-Fur Coalition, Jane Halevy, who immigrated to Israel from France 19 years ago, says the International Fur Trade Federation concedes that people who support banning may be more politically critical of Israel than people who support the fur trade or are indifferent to it.

However, she adds that this instance presents Israel with a rare opportunity to make headway with exactly those circles by leading the way in banning fur.

Herscovici - whose father chaired both the Fur Council of Canada and the country's United Jewish Appeal - said Israeli support for banning fur would end up hurting many Jews in Canada and elsewhere. "It'd make it harder to oppose attempts to ban kosher slaughter in the West," he said.

Over the past few weeks Halevy has used her contacts with European celebrities and politicians who congratulated the Knesset for considering the bill and urged the parliament to continue the process.

Moses, of United Torah Judaism, says he met with Herscovici several times on the latter's visit to Israel. He says that he has become convinced that the same organizations fighting fur are also fighting kosher slaughter, believed by some to be inhumane.

Moreover, he says he is concerned that "Israel is being used as the stage for an international struggle." His research into the issue, he says, shows that 70 percent of fur consumption in Israel is for the Haredi community. "It therefore makes no sense to make an exception to a rule," he said.

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 8. 0 0
    you all missed the point
    • yael g
    • 19.03.10
    • 16:15

    the article says hareidim did not protest!!! the fur coalition of canada leader rushed to israel and hinted that if the bill is passed a lot of jews would be hurt outside of israel and give less money to israeli charities pathetic

  • 7. 0 0
    Sorry, but cannot understand why shreimels not made from
    • Esther
    • 19.03.10
    • 13:00

    ... artificial fur, like most of the "fur"-coats etc that civilized folk wear nowadays... ... is genuine-fur also an edict that comes-out-of-the-Bible?...

  • 6. 0 0
    Fur industry and anti-semitism
    • Critical Observer
    • 19.03.10
    • 12:45

    Herscovici: Israel "is being demonized and delegitimized in the West in the same way that the fur industry is being demonized -" Extending anti-semitism to the fur industry is something quite surprising, isn't it?

  • 5. 0 0
    Hurrah for common sense...
    • vernon marriott
    • 19.03.10
    • 12:43

    Thanks goodness the Knesset have dropped this piece of nonsense. Perhaps now they will focus on things that really matter, like the lamentable state of the education system, improving public transport, the lack of affordable housing, poverty etc - rather than a piece of legislation that would probably have not been followed pushed through by a lobby that are out of touch with most Israelis (who really don't give two hoots about fur...)

  • 4. 0 0
    haredi nonsense logic
    • eddie
    • 19.03.10
    • 11:54

    1) I am not opposed to use of animal skins, but if so, the animals should be treated humanely and not skinned alive. That is contrary to Jewish law. 2) The haredi fur shtreimel has nothignwhatsoever to do with the Torah. They have simply adopted the dress of the cossack opressors who murdered hundrds of thousands of innocent jews. If they insisnt on dressing like that, they can have faux shtreimels. There is no obligation to wear a dead animal on your head. Furthermore , it can cost several thousand dolalrs - that money could be put to better use, eg feeding their children. I suppose the difference between leather and fur is that the leather is a by product of meat , which is legitimate. On th eother hand, those species which are bred for human use, tend to survive better than those who have no use to us domineering humans.

  • 3. 0 0
    #1 Mark Lincoln and #2 David
    • Yonatan
    • 19.03.10
    • 10:58

    The reason the Hasidim wear those funny clothes and fur hats is because, when Hasidism began in the late 17th century, that's the way polish nobles used to dress. The poor, downtrodden Jews wanted to feel like Christian nobles at least some of the time.

  • 2. 0 0
    haredi traditions vs jewish law
    • david
    • 19.03.10
    • 06:57

    Not being religious, I may be mistaken, but I don't recall hearing that there was anything in the Torah, Talmud, Maimonides, Rashi, etc, etc which requires Jews to wear fur hats, black coats, funny robes or to go around looking like some character out of Fiddler on the Roof.

  • 1. 0 0
    The 21st century capitulates to the retards from the 15th century
    • Mark Lincoln
    • 19.03.10
    • 05:54

    How any nation which lets mental defective determine it's destiny can be considered civilized is a BIG question. Is Iran run by a bunch of 7th century retards a civilized natio? Or what about Israel which is run by 16th century retards? Is it a civilized nation. I don't know about Civilized, but any nation which allows it's destiny to be determined by the insane is in deep trouble.