Erekat to Haaretz: New proposal more generous than deal we offered Olmert
Chief PA negotiator says peace proposal is more generous to Israel than the demands presented by Mahmoud Abbas to former prime minister Ehud Olmert.
By Avi Issacharoff and Yanir YagnaThe Palestinian Authority has submitted a far-reaching peace proposal to the Obama administration that is more generous to Israel than the demands presented by Mahmoud Abbas to former prime minister Ehud Olmert, the chief PA negotiator told Haaretz on Saturday.
|
From left, U.S. Mideast envoy George Mitchell, Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in May. |
| Photo by: AP |
Saeb Erekat also said the PA's detailed offer would end the conflict with Israel and resolve all Palestinian claims.
"I presented Senator George Mitchell with a series of official documents," Erekat said, referring to the special U.S. envoy to the Middle East. "We gave him maps and papers that clearly state our positions on all the final-status issues: borders, Jerusalem, refugees, water and security. Thus far we have not received any answer from the Israeli side."
When asked if the Palestinian positions were similar to those presented during talks with Olmert, Erekat replied: "It's more than that. I cannot go into details on what exactly was proposed, but Abu Mazen [PA President Mahmoud Abbas] offered more in these documents than what he proposed to Olmert in the past. Abu Mazen took bigger steps to reach peace."
Earlier this year Erekat distributed a document to European diplomats saying the PA had offered Olmert a swap that would let Israel annex 1.9 percent of the West Bank. The document also claimed that the PA had expressed a willingness to accept an Israeli proposal to allow 15,000 Palestinian refugees to return to the country every year over 10 years.
International media outlets reported earlier this year that the PA had agreed to land swaps equaling 2.3 percent, while another report said it had accepted a swap of 3.8 percent. Erekat confirmed to Haaretz that the Palestinians have become more flexible on this issue.
He denied reports in the Arab media over the weekend that the Obama administration had threatened sanctions against the PA - perhaps even the severing of ties - if Abbas did not agree to enter direct talks with Israel over a final-status agreement.
Dr. Hanan Ashrawi, a Palestinian lawmaker and a member of the PLO central committee, told the pan-Arab daily Al-Quds Al-Arabi that Washington "applied tremendous pressures on the Palestinian Authority so that it would move to direct talks."
Ashrawi said the United States threatened to downgrade or even sever ties with Ramallah.
Another Arab language newspaper, Al-Hayat, reported that Obama had sent a special communique to Abbas last month that said Washington would not work to extend the Israeli construction freeze in West Bank settlements if the Palestinian leader continued to oppose direct negotiations. According to the report, Obama made clear to Abbas that the United States would reject any Palestinian efforts to appeal to the Security Council in lieu of direct talks with Israel.
During an Arab League meeting in Cairo on Thursday, Abbas said he had been subject to intense pressure to agree to direct talks. Erekat confirmed that many Arab leaders sought to persuade the Palestinian leader to reconsider his position, but he denied any suggestions that Washington had threatened the PA.
"[The communique] stated that if the Palestinians do not enter direct discussions, reaching a two-state solution will be even more difficult and the Americans' ability to help in that regard will be even more limited," Erekat said. "There were no threats."
Erekat also denied a report by Israel Radio that Haim Ramon, a former minister and lawmaker from the opposition Kadima party, had urged the PA not to enter into direct negotiations with the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
"I am astounded at times to see how low these stories can go," Erekat said. "Ramon didn't tell me to enter direct talks or not to enter them. Such a thing never happened, and no Israeli will tell us anything along those lines."
Erekat also denied that Ramon had been sent at the behest of President Shimon Peres. "Do not drag us into your internal politics," he added.
"Shimon himself tells me every time we meet, 'Go into direct talks,'" Erekat said. "I meet with many Israelis but I do not accept instructions from them or from Ramon."
Peres is scheduled to depart for Cairo Sunday for a meeting with President Hosni Mubarak. The two leaders will discuss the latest efforts to renew direct talks between Israel and the PA.
Peres is expected to urge Mubarak to continue to press Abbas to begin direct discussions with Israel. He is expected to say Israel is serious in its intentions to advance the peace process.
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
to settle in Israel is a non starter.
Stay turned to the ever changing process of land for peace; watch as Netanyahu steps back from his statement Jerusalem is the undivided capitol of Israel. Everyone is watching; no one is blinding yet. Watch as Abbas declares the new PAL state will be Jew free and actually gets away with it. Watch as Obama slides the knife into Israel’s ribs at the last minute. Peace is at hand and so is war; how can this be unless there really is no consensus between the parties. The ME is becoming a millstone around the world’s neck. Wars and rumors of war, Nations rising up against nations. You cannot know the time, but you can know the season. The Judaic/Christian world waits for the Messiah who will bring peace, but the Muslim’s await their Messiah who will bring destruction to the non Muslim word. With all this going on; can peace be achieved?
and Arab delaying tactics till now. Do tell how you know the details you claim? What is the place of the "refugee winning card" in this generous offer.?
let us hope that the interpretation of resolutions 242 and 338 be a little different from 242 dunams for palestine and 338 settlements for israel
The PA has made a generous opening offer. It will give up close to 2% of its land for peace. You don't need a map to work that one out, it's one-fifth of the land east of the Green Line that has been seized by Israel's 'Security barrier'. So the Beitar Illit bloc, most of Gush Etzion, the 10 big settlements around Jerusalem and the Jewish Quarter of the Old City. That's a big hit, Jewish Israelis should be more than content with that undeserved land haul. Now over to Israel - what's it going to offer on its part? The trouble is, Israel never says. They have so many conditions (14) and want so much of Palestine (40% if Bibi is serious about the Jordan Valley), I guess it's difficult to know where to start if you're Israel and on the make. You risk the rest of the world having an apoplectic fit when they realise the full extent of Israeli greed, even the USA and Micronesia will balk at that. Before any ardent Zio says that Olmert presented an Israeli map last time around, do remember that he SHOWED them (didn't give them) a map and said that the deal was conditional upon the PA signing a comprehensive and final agreement based on that map - which showed Israel keeping East Jerusalem, Ariel, Ma'ale Adumim and other impossible Sudetenland-style demands. When the Pals declined to agree the excessive territory that Israel sought to grab (6.3% of the West Bank), the Israelis did not give the PA a copy of the map! Is it remotely possible that Israel can for once put aside the tactics of the souk, the used car salesman and the bullying military oppressor and come up with a genuine and sensible counter-offer? With Netanyahu and his far-right factions wedded to their 19th Century expansionist, nationalist dream of A Greater Jewish Reich, don't think anyone should hold their breath that any commonsense will come out of Jerusalem. But let's see what TANGIBLE proposals Israel presents in return. The world is waiting...
The world will end before this conflict is solved. So let's just stop talking about it. Who cares?
First Hamas must ratify the agreement, without that you don't have an agreement. The only solution is a three state solution with Gaza being its own state, allied with another entity such as Egypt with a loose affiliation with West Bank. You don't ahve a true desire for peace on the PA just more time to get more money for its leaders.
SE is also known in Israel as the Pathological Liar, or Arafat's Remote control. During the battle in Jenin, SE made numerous interviews to the press to claim that the Israelis killed 500 Palestinians. Whatever SE says, I would be very carefull !
Abbas' term of office expired over 2 years ago as did all member of PA legislative council. This little group runs by fiat and dictate refusing to allow new and proper elections. Fattah knows it would lose in Ramallah too as it did in Gaza.
Abbas represents almost nothing for the Palestinians. He is an US's stooge and thus proposes exactly what "controlled" congress tells him to propose. I fear Israel will never get such a wonderful negotiator. Hurry up : it's clearance sales !
If the PA offer is so far-reaching why not disclose the details to the public and thereby put pressure on Netanyahu to accept? Is Abbas frightened that the Israelis will accept the offer but his own people will reject it? Maybe that's because of all the years of incitement. The Palestinians have only ever known leaders who follow, never leaders who lead. If there really was "an Israeli proposal to allow 15,000 Palestinian refugees to return to the country every year over 10 years" (which I very much doubt), the PA is nuts for not grabbing it. How many 1948 refugees are still alive? Olmert's proposed map that he handed to the PA in 2008 was subsequently published in Ha'aretz. Let's see the PA map!
Who will stop Hamas from firing rockets? Or any other Iranian-backed group for that matter?
Sellout by Mr. Abbas that yet will be rejected by the Zionists.
This whole situation is so perverse. One side or the other seeks a little gain based on a sickening "my people deserves more than yours" theory. Both have held the land in dispute. Both say it is theirs. Both have no qualms about killing the other to prove their own right is ascendent. Israelis have more blood on their hands, but Palestinians may have killed more indiscriminately (bus bombs, disco bombs, and missiles with no guidance system). My impression of the situation is that Abbas is doing the right things (without signalling an absolute surrender), Netanyahu is trying to say the right things and do nothing, and Hamas has no interest in a peace agreement whatsoever and would act to sabotage it. On the outside, USA still considers israels interests paramount and does not consider further conflict too great a price if it is what GOI wants. Europe wants peace and a reasonable solution above all else, Russia is a bit inscrutable but probably prefers peace over further conflict, and the UN has granted a little too much influence to its "peace first" bodies which criticize Israel at a hat drop but dismiss too many Palestinian wrongs. Still the only ones who would extend conflict stand in a bad light: Hamas, Israeli government, Yesha, Syria, Iran, and Al Qaeda. I think will for peace is strong among USA, Fatah, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and some factions in Israel. I wish Obama's administration would follow through on their threat to condemn those hindering the peace process. This awful conflict has gone too long, cost too much, and benefited too few.
or just the normal daily delusion. That is the only question about these comments so detached from any factual basis.
The Palestinians have not occupied one square inch or built a single settlement on land Israel claimed as its territory in 1948, yet Israel continues each day to try to take more and more land outside its declared border and then has the nerve to say it is making difficult concessions when ask to leave Do you really believe you will fool anyone by making such an absurd claim when it is absolutely clear that it is Israel who is doing all the grabbing?
When do you plan to accept and proclaim in Arabic and Hebrew and English Erekat right to his own country, west of the Jordan? With Full Sovereignty and based on his and his people's historic, ethical and legal grounds? When will Netanyahu state this unequivocally? I've heard and read that from Erekat and Abbas, but never from Netanyahu or any Likudnik.
There never will be a Pal state, certainly not with Jerusalem as Capital. negotiations will not acheive that.
I astounded to hear that the Palestinians put in detail an offer to Mitchell and haven't heard a single word back from the peace loving Israeli PM. All I've seen for months is you Zionist bad mouthing the Pals for being non committal. Well where is the Israeli peace proposal? Pray tell let the whole world know, we've been waiting for 20 years. I suspect there's nothing. All Israel wants to do is stall. There's always a reason. If they can't give the Palestinians some rough boundary conditions, they this whole thing is a shame. I suggest the Palestinians just throw in the towel. They will never get the Zionist to agree to anything. I suspect Israel wants all of the West Bank, and is looking for a bloody excuse to incite the Palestinians so they can expel them. Just like the did in 48' when they incited panic amongst the indigenous peoples to flee their villages.
150.000 Palestinian refugees into Israel is insane. It doesn't solve the Palestinian refugee issue, and it just is a demographic Troyan horse for Israel. The whole idea is a non starter. Let settlers return to the green line within Israel, and Palestinian refugees to Palestine. Then you do honor the "solve the conflict" mantra.
The refugee idea was an Israeli proposal. It won't affect demographics at all.
West Bank Arabs are shrewd Politicians. Gazan Arabs are Terrorists. Israel is Old Sparta with a High Tech Twist run by shrewd Politicians. Settlers are Mishuginahs. Evangelicals will support all the Jews. I just want to see the end of the Wars. Saddam is gone. Assad Sr. has left this World and an Eye Doctor has taken over. Hezbollah won't listen to anybody and the Lebanese still hate each other. Russia and the U.S. just want the oil and to make some money. The Cold War has ended. The Chinese want peace too but they sympathize with North Korea. Iran is being run by insane people who want Iranians to live with Medieval Laws like stoning and the elections aren't fair. Saudis are keeping tight lipped. Who knows what they are really thinking? People on the Palestinian Side. Erekat is a normal person. I don't agree with Hanan Ashrawi over issues like Jerusalem but if I was in her shoes, I'd probably say the same thing. On the Israeli Side. Barak is a brave statesman and a warrior. Netanyahu is a shrewd politician. The Palestinians in Lebanon will never be satisfied but they shouldn't be unduly persecuted either. They should be resettled in other parts of the Arab World if they're in danger. The Palestinians in Jordan are okay. Actually, I'd feel fine if the Arab League would just accept Israel into it. Then maybe it could all be called something else. I'd name it after me. Yo-Semite Land.
An accommodation of peaceful co-existence between Arab and Jew, between the Arab world and the nation-state of the Jewish people, Israel? Is your problem with the concept of "peaceful"? If so, why should Israel talk to you in the first place? Or, perhaps your problem is with the concept of "co-existence"? Is your goal to eliminate the existence of your opponents? If so, again, why should anyone talk to you? And of course, you may object to accepting Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people? If so, why should anyone accept your demand of a nation-state of the "Palestinian people"? Note, United Nations Security Council Resolution 242 which has been the basis for ALL peace talks and agreements does not call for the setting up of an additional state in the region all together and concepts such as "Palestine" or "Palestinian people" don't appear in the resolution at all. So, the question remains: Why do you, the leaders of the Arab world, local and regional, refuse to accept the concept of "an accommodation of peaceful coexistence between Arab and Jew, between the Arab world and the nation state of the Jewish people, Israel"??!!
require Isreal to give up any disputed or contested land except through a negotiated agreement. thus Israel need do nothing and keep the areas legally. Israel departed siania and Gaza and other areas more than 70% of its gains in ;67
Abbas needs to push the Quartet for support in any direct negotiations. Hillary Clinton has already demonstrated a strong bias favoring Israel and their so-called "facts on the ground". It was Russia that thwarted Hillary's attempts to ram settlements down Abbas' throat. Obama allowed vicious attacks on Goldstone for his impartial assessment of the Israeli invasion of Gaza. Abbas needs to look to Russia and the EU for support and guidance rather than blindly trust the USA. After the USA has empowered Israel in the past to continue their campaign of suppression against Palestine.
care to give your sources for this unreaveled plan?
They parade them out when ever there is a big pay out, so they can further fatten their Swiss bank accounts.
These zionist with their spoiled mentality thinking they can push the envelope by taking in more land. The trouble that my zionist friends is that since we Americans have supported you for decades we get the heat from the rest of the Islamic world because it looks like we condone your greedy mentality. This puts americans in danger like it already has and its about this silliness of yours comes to an end. There is an end to our patience and its coming very soon if you don't give the palestinians a fair resolution to this whole sorted affair. We can't afford to have our people here in America getting attacked and our treasury deplete with wars indefinitely in that part of the world just because you want more land. If you don't think the Islamic world hates us for supporting Israel then you have your heads screwed on wrong.
the article under the above spoke about quassam rockets that bombed Israel today. If the leaders of Gaza cannot control the terrorists what is the use of talking about peace with them?
The offer of which was to remove Israel from planet earth
...the nation-state of the Jewish people, based on historic, ethical and legal grounds, and 2) accept a peace treaty as the "end of the conflict". State the above, in Arabic, Hebrew and English, and you'll see a sea-change of attitude among all the relevant parties; a change for the good, from which all will benefit. Will Mr. Erekat make such a statement, or will Mr. Abbas...??
OR WILL HE JUST PLAY FOR TIME AND DO THE STALL GAME
Will Israel agree to a reciprocal agreement granting the right of the Palestinian people to exist within their mandated lands based on 'historic, ethical and legal grounds'? Of course not. Why is Israel special to anyone but Zionists?
Would Israel then accept: 1) the Palestinians' RIGHT to exist, not merely that they exist (some of your compatriots and supporters don't even accept that!); 2) That peace means the "end of the conflict", i.e no more unjustified land-grabs under the various flimsly excuses that Israel has come up with over the years, and sovereignty for the Palestinians. In Hebrew, Arabic and English of course.
It's one thing to demand that Palestinians to accept Israel's right to live in peace and security. It's something entirely different to ask them to accept Israel's right to exist on "historical, ethical and legal grounds". That's basically asking Palestinians to become Zionists. If I were Palestinians, I certainly wouldn't do that.
Abu Mazen couldn't make peace even if he wanted to.His power and control over the Palestinians is weak at best and it extends only over the West Bank.He doesn't want to get into direct negotiations because he knows his own people won't follow him
Unfortunately for Mr Eirekat, Hanan Ashrawi is more credible.
The real truth is simple. The chance for peace between Israel and Palestine has irrevocably past. There can be no peace until there are no Palestinians left in Judea and Samaria. Clearly Abbas and Erkat understand that once the USA is out of the negotiations, then the negotiations are over. Where they are wrong is that there could be any other outcome. Israel has no interest in making peace with the Palestinians. Indeed Israel is determined that there are no Palestinians, only Arabs who live in Israel. The USA has no interest in securing a homeland for Palestinians. The EU has no desire to sacrifice for a homeland for Palestinians. The Arab League is only interested in blaming Israel for the failure to have a Palestinian homeland. The UN has no ability or desire to promote a Palestinian homeland. To put the conclusions in the simplest possible terms: Aside from Palestinians - who are powerless - there is NO power on Earth willing to lift a finger to preserve a homeland for Palestinians. Solution? Palestinians should try and gain refuge in Europe and America for themselves.
It would be more than the 1850 sq.mile area of the West Bank, and Texans won't even miss it. And best part - no Jews for 200 miles in any direction! (but oops, no Jews for them to blame everything on either).
Doesn't Kinky Friedman live in Texas?
THESE GUYS ARE TALKING ABOUT ETHNICALLY CLEANSING OF THE PALESTINIANS. LIKE MK ZOABI SAID RECENTLY IN A INTERVIEW," We did not immigrate to Israel. Israel immigrated to us. We are the indigenous people of a land from which we are being gradually expelled," THESE GUYS HAVE THE GALL TO TALK ABOUT DISPLACING THESE PEOPLE AGAIN. THE MIND OF THE EUROPEAN, PURE ARROGANCE.
Your statement is false. The profound truth is that the palestinian people will never permit the israelis to uproot them from palestine .
the whole "let's displace a random group of people to give ourselves a homeland because We're Worth It (TM)" thing didn't work out too well 62 years ago, mark, and it isn't going to work now. two wrongs don't make a right. the palestinians should stay put and force a change in their own land, not run away. sooner or later a solution WILL come, either by demographic change or a peace plan or an imposed order from the UN.
Israel, under a non-Likud government, tried sincerely to come to an agreement. Rabin did, Barak did, Olmert did. The U.N. is pro-Palestinian, the E.U. is pro-Palestinian too. The Arab League is pro-Palestinian, and yes, you are right, they want to blame Israel forever. Palestinians don't belong elsewhere, and that is as outrageous as saying Jews belong elsewhere. A two-state solution is realistic, simple, and everybody knows the price. It's just that no doctors have the nerve to do the surgery. Obama wants, or would like to. Netanyahu doesn't, and Abu Mazen doesn't either. So maybe after Netanyahu, if Iran is not entrenched and has toppled the PA, and if the settlers are still to be brought within the green line. I don't see the two-state solution past, but very present, despite the odds.
Then again there is LA County. But why should anybody move? It is just a matter of sovereignty. Israel is addicted to sovereignty over the Palestinian population. Brnd just wants to remove the Palestinians so he can see who wins in the argument over who can be a Jew. Reestablishing the Judean Empire of David is unlikely. Jordanians and Iraqis and Jordanians will object. And like before, lots of non-Judean Israelis will object to monarchy.
Any time I set foot in Israel, I have to answer never ending questions of Israelis on "how to get a green card and become an American citizen".
on the vast majority of mandate Palestine? Why there were no attempts to create a a Palestine on the Wert Bank and Gaza and the part of Jerusalem ehnically cleansed of Jews and ruled by Arabs? They did not want their own state they wanted the Jewish state- out ! So stop being a martyr by proxy and offering something that everybody knows the US & EU will not accept. Arabs have much more of the Palestine that was promised to Israel than the Jews ever got.
Do you ever read my posts psm. " In 1938, Ben-Gurion made it clear of his support for the "Jewish state" on part of Palestine was only as a stepping ground for a complete conquest. He wrote: "[I am] satisfied with part of the country, but on the basis of the assumption that after we build up a strong force following the establishment of the state--we will abolish the partition of the country and we will expand to the whole Land of Israel." (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 107 & One Palestine Complete, p. 403) * One day after the UN vote to partition Palestine, Menachem Begin, the commander of the Irgun gang and Israel's future Prime Minister between 1977-1983, proclaimed: "The Partition of Palestine is illegal. It will never be recognized .... Jerusalem was and will for ever be our capital. Eretz Israel will be restored to the people of Israel. All of it. And for Ever." (Iron Wall p. 25) * ""Shamir has said Israel must keep the territories in order to accommodate the immigrants. "A great aliyah [immigration]," he said, "requires a Greater Israel."(5) He has insisted that, although Soviet Jews are not being directed to the territories, any Jew has the right to live anywhere in the land of Israel, which for most Israelis includes the territories. As Foreign Minister David Levy said in August: "The right to settle every part of Israel is unequivocally clear even if there are disagreements over this matter. "Now read the likud charter and tell us where it offers a state to Palestinians. Cut the zio propo psm.We are all onto you long long ago.
Texas and SW has it own problems with up to 20,000 illegals crossing per day, which is about the total population of Israel per year. We could use some help from IDF to train our border guards.
Without the details, Netanyahu can continue to lie to the Israeli people. Erekat should know this. If Erekat keeps the details secret, the Israeli people will never know how generous the offer is. All they will be told is that "Arabs want it all!" Mr. Erekat - You are already Israeli internal politics. All politics is local.
Please come up with some details or shut up.
you know this from texas or you trust haaretz to tell the truth. haaretz is as anti israel as it gets
It is easy to mistake, he is so smooth. He even fooled Larry King when he was last in the US. He said that Israel had withdrawn from every square inch of Lebanon. He said the same of Gaza when the IDF prohibits anything living within a KM of the border on the Gaza side, except IDF troops. He ignores the village of Ghajar that is 50% occupied by the IDF and the Shabaa Farms, 100% occupied.
belong to syria or so they claimed. we pulled out of lebanon mark. if we give back the golan to syria, what is to stop them from terrorizing our north like they did prior to the 67, 73 and 82 wars... which they started and lost.
Read Moshe Dyan's memoirs about the Golan. The attacks were provoked by Israel at the urging of the settlers, because they were "mad for the land"
Israel needs land for greater Israel, and no one can stop them, except the United States. If Abbas cannot get the land back then he must seek the vote.
Which land did he posses in order to "to get it back," in the first place? Tell us exactly which territory was his at any point in history so he can, "get it back."
The Palestinians won't.
come to a solution to end this conflict already!
The Israeli Government will Fall right after the US mid-term elections.
The settlements are not "illegal" as sometimes charged. The Fourth Geneva Convention does not apply to settlements even though you will often hear the claim that it does. Israel took over the land in a defensive war in 1967 from rulers (Jordan, Egypt) who themselves had recently acquired control of the land by aggressive war. The only internationally recognized agreements are those of the Oslo process which do not in any sentence prohibit settlements. At some points in time Israel has voluntarily agreed to a temporary halt to new settlements in anticipation of negotiating breakthroughs. But the repeated reversion to terrorism by the Palestinian Arabs has ended such restraint. The endlessly repeated refrain about "occupied territories" is propaganda, since a) the territories never belonged to Palestinian Arabs, b) the Palestinian Authority was given control of the areas, and c) the only reason Israel continues to exert control is in reaction to Palestinian Arab violence.
Peace is not compatible with the demands of the Palestinians,including their refugee "winning card" and the fact that Hamas,their elected government, openly says they will never accept peace with and recognition of Israel. The Pals have refused every opportunity for a state since 1948 There were no settlers in 1967 but there was No negotiations No recognition No peace from the Arabs as a unit. Netanyahu has gone on record often enough accepting a Palestinian state. It is very" intellectual" to blame Israel for everything but even more ignorant and dishonest,grossly so.
cut the zio propo psm. We are all aware of what it is you dream of. THE GREATER ISRAEL. ARAB FREI.
Nothing new here at all
That's why the world is in favor of direct peace talks.
The US is third party, a witness. Even though the US is not an honest broker at least there is some semblance of an empire.
The reason why Palestinians need a "broker" a go between as they are used to since time immerorial everybody babied them so they are used to the royal treatment... its over now Pales we see you the way you are liars and cheats while the Bosses reap the goodies and have fat savings accounts in European Banks stolen from the very Palestinians whom the world sees as "suffering" to conclude, a broker is a messenger and doesnt have to really see the RED faces and the Pinochio noses the Palestinian leadership grew from all the lies they think they can snowball the world and you at Haaretz who is eager to post anything that will cause a sensation!!!
The US is more honest than anyother country and there is nothing empiril about the US
But empire suits. ; )
Reaching a deal is important but implementing the deal is more crucial. I hope that a deal can be achieved. Because a small piece of desert became a deadlock for regional peace. Furthermore, it instigates the radical movements all over the world.