• Published 15:59 27.06.10
  • Latest update 15:59 27.06.10

Envoy to Washington fears U.S.-Israeli relations in ‘tectonic rift,’ diplomats say

According to the Israeli diplomats, Oren said relations between the two countries are not in a crisis because a crisis is something that passes.

By Barak Ravid

Israel’s ambassador to Washington, Michael Oren, painted a dark picture of U.S.-Israeli relations during a briefing at the Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem last week. Israeli diplomats say Oren described the current situation as a “tectonic rift” in which Israel and the United States are like continents drifting apart.

Oren’s comments come in the run-up to the July 6 meeting between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. President Barack Obama at the White House.

Ambassador Michael Oren

Ambassador Michael Oren.

Photo by: Natasha Mozgovaya

Oren visited Israel over the past week, briefing Israelis at the ministry’s North America and research divisions. Five Israeli diplomats, some of whom took part in the briefing or were informed about the details, said Oren described relations between the two countries in bleak terms.

Oren, however, has denied making such statements.

According to the Israeli diplomats, Oren said relations between the two countries are not in a crisis because a crisis is something that passes. Oren opted to use terms from geology: “Relations are in the state of a tectonic rift in which continents are drifting apart.”

Oren noted that contrary to Obama’s predecessors − George W. Bush and Bill Clinton − the current president is not motivated by historical-ideological sentiments toward Israel but by cold interests and considerations. He added that his access as Israel’s ambassador to senior administration officials and close advisers of the president is good. But Obama has very tight control over his immediate environment, and it is hard to influence him.

“This is a one-man show,” Oren is quoted as saying.

The Israeli ambassador said the events of the Gaza-bound flotilla stirred a great deal of anti-Israel reaction − in the United States, too. Only after a few days did the situation balance out.

“Even our close friends came out against us,” Oren said. “Only after some time, when video from the ship arrived and was aired by the American media, did public opinion begin to shift in Israel’s favor.”

In the days after the violent takeover of the Turkish ship bound for the Gaza Strip, Oren granted more than 20 media interviews in the United States, helping give Israel’s version of the story.

Meanwhile, Netanyahu is scheduled to meet for the fifth time with Obama in a bid to build trust and rehabilitate ties with the United States.

Defense Minister Ehud Barak visited Washington last week and met with Vice President Joe Biden, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Senator John Kerry, who heads the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee, is due to visit Israel and meet with Netanyahu, Barak and President Shimon Peres.

Also last week, Pentagon and Defense Ministry officials held talks in Israel within the framework of the two countries’ strategic dialogue that focuses on maintaining the Israel Defense Forces’ technological edge over Arab armies.

The U.S. undersecretary of defense for policy, Michele Flournoy, told Haaretz that “defense ties between Israel and the United States are stronger than ever.” She said the United States is giving Israel access to the most advanced systems of the American defense industry.

The special U.S. envoy to the Middle East, George Mitchell, is due for a fifth round of indirect talks between Israel and the Palestinians Authority.

Late last week, for the first time since the Netanyahu government formed, senior officials from Israel and the Palestinian Authority − Dan Meridor and Saeb Erekat − met with representatives of the 15 members of the UN Security Council.

 

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 5. 0 0
    to No1, Peter Burman
    • DC
    • 29.06.10
    • 03:42

    We know how you guys work: You never do wrong, when caught and if someone says something: kill the messenger, and if all else fails, deflect and say "they do it and nobody stops them, why us? You're anti-semitic". Let me help you, the The Roma of Europe are suffering, when are they gonna give then their land? The sarcasm is obvious, your deceitful thoughts and negligence to give the Pals a state is also obvious. Man up, Either free them or give them full rights.

  • 4. 0 0
    Rift with the US administration.
    • Jon
    • 28.06.10
    • 11:58

    I would entirely agree about the term "rift", but not with the vision of a rift between the US and Israel. It seems to me that the rift is between the Obama administration and Israel, and that it will last as long as the Obama administration can maintain it. The mid terms in November will have an impact on the sustainability of this rift, which could be perhaps described visually as a team pushing hard against a ship roped to a dock. you can push it a few centimeters, but you have to keep pushing as otherwise the immensely strong ropes of mutual interest ans shared philosophy will drad it back to the place you started from, and which frankly there will be no visible impact an hour of so after you have stopped pushing. This rift is a waste of Obama's energy, in a "lost cause" to get the Arabs to ally themselves with the US despite Iraq, 9/11, the increasing menace of Islamo-Fascism, and just plain brownian motion.

  • 3. 0 0
    Pragmatism please
    • op
    • 27.06.10
    • 18:45

    With any luck this will be the end of the recent surge of rightwing extremism. It's roots were planted in US aquiescence - land for peace now!

  • 2. 0 0
    israel and the usa
    • dsm
    • 27.06.10
    • 18:34

    the only reason the US is creating a rift is to gain leverage vis a vis negotiations w the PA. if true, why would Israel acknowledge the rift? why not ignore it and go about business as ususal? put differently why is Israel giving the US what it wants by acknowledging the obvious? and more importantly, on a more fundamental level there is a major shift going on among the public which is far less pro israel than in the past. this shift is obfuscated to most israeli govt officials because they spend their time w wealthy jewish community and w members of Congress who are largely pro Israel. This is the same Congress that that is held in such low repute by the US public. The real shift going on is the US losing economic power, the alientation of the public and the consequences on the publics view of Israel. Israeli govt officials are blind to this mega trend and will be caught flat footed once the economy takes a 2nd and 3rd leg down.

  • 1. 0 0
    When will the Kurds be given an independent Kurdistan?
    • Peter Burman
    • 27.06.10
    • 17:23

    There are more Kurds than Palestinians and the Kurds have suffered much worse over history than the Palestinians -- no billions of UN aid for the Kurds; no UNWRA for the Kurds. It's time that the world demand fair treatment for the Kurds and an independent Kurdistan!

    • 0 0
      Smoke and MIrrors
      • DC
      • 29.06.10
      • 03:40

      We know how you guys work: You never do wrong, when caught and if someone says something: kill the messenger, and if all else fails, deflect and say "they do it and nobody stops them, why us? You're anti-semitic". Let me help you, the The Roma of Europe are suffering, when are they gonna give then their land? The sarcasm is obvious, your deceitful thoughts and negligence to give the Pals a state is also obvious. Man up, Either free them or give them full rights.