Demjanjuk case could set precedent in Germany
There are hundreds if not thousands of retirees who served in Nazi camps and fled to the U.S. after the war.
By Ofer Aderet Tags: Israel news NaziBERLIN - For Bronislaw Hajda, an 85-year-old Polish-American, the trial of John Demjanjuk is a bad omen.
Like Demjanjuk, whose trial began Monday in Germany, Hajda was born in Eastern Europe and taken prisoner by the Nazis at a young age. He too trained in an SS camp and was employed as a Wachman (a non-German SS soldier who assisted German soldiers in killing Jews) at a concentration camp in Poland.
Like Demjanjuk, he too fled to the United States at the end of World War II and has already been put on trial for his crimes. Unlike Demjanjuk, however, no one is hunting Hajda - not even Germany.
On the face of it, it was only fate that brought Demjanjuk to the witness stand in Germany while Hajda spends his remaining years as a free man in Chicago. But in fact the reason for this difference is Germany's policy of not trying suspected war criminals who are not themselves German. Demjanjuk, therefore, represents an unusual precedent, one that could obligate Germany to try similar suspects in the future.
Demjanjuk, 89, is accused of assisting in the murder of 27,000 Jews in 1943 while a prison guard at the Sobibor extermination camp in Poland. Hajda, four years his junior, was charged 12 years ago with aiding in the murder of hundreds of Jews in Treblinka, another extermination camp in Poland, in 1944. Like Demjanjuk, who has already been tried in Israel, Hajda understands the legal process well.
In 1997 a U.S. court ruled that Hajda had "without doubt" committed the crimes attributed to him. But because the offenses were not carried out in U.S. territory the American justice system had no authority to rule on them, but only to deport him to a country with less restrictive laws.
U.S. legal authorities began investigating Hajda's past in 1994 and later revoked his citizenship. Four years later a U.S. immigration court ordered his deportation to Poland, where he was born, or Germany, from which he had immigrated to America. For more than a decade he has been waiting to be deported.
There are hundreds, perhaps thousands of others from Russia, Hungary, Romania and the former Yugoslavia in similar situations - elderly retirees who served in Nazi camps and fled to the U.S. after the war. Over the years 107 of them have been detained by U.S. authorities and had their citizenship revoked. In Europe, however, few seem to care.
Eli Rosenbaum, head of the U.S. Justice Department bureau that investigates potential crimes against humanity, knows their names well. Europe has abandoned its moral and legal responsibility over Nazi crimes," he said, singling out Germany as having thwarted every U.S. attempt to return Nazi criminals to the Continent.
For its part, Germany has long claimed that it is responsible only for trying its own. The official position of its Federal Foreign Office, revealed this week in Die Zeit, is to reject every request to try Nazi criminals if they do not hold or have never held German citizenship, and if the odds of convicting them are low. Underpinning the policy is concern that in the event of an acquittal these war criminals would live out their lives as free men on German soil. The suspects' countries of origin have expressed similar positions, some because of the high cost of legal proceedings, others out of fear of bringing their past to light.
The case of Demjanjuk, therefore, represents a legal precedent of the utmost significance for Germany. If he is convicted the state will find it difficult to refuse to try those suspected of similar crimes. Hajda and others could then find themselves under lock and key - if they live that long.
Why Facebook Connect?
Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.
- Latest
- Most Viewed
- Most Rated
- Open all
Demjanjuk, a Ukrainian private, Prisoner of War from the Soviet Union captured by the Nazis, supposedly committed crimes in Poland for the Nazis, Works as a driver for US Army, supposedly intentionally runs over Jew, migrates to US, raises kids who are US Citizens, retires from Ford Motor Co after 30 years, Falsely accused of being "Ivan the Terrible," US Citizenship denied, deported to face trial using banana justice in Israel using ex post facto law and made up on the spot judicial decisions, convicted using false testimony (witnesses lie) and physical evidence (doctored ID provided by KGB), sentenced to death, conviction overturned after proven to be the wrong person, returned to the US, US citizenship revoked, deported to Germany to face trial using banana justice using ex post facto law and made up on the spot judicial decisions, in which there are no witnesses or physical evidence to link him to any particular incident or crime. To be continued..........
didn't you read article, they found none in 50 years. Well... at least they are honest ;)
Treblinka was not "Polish extermination camp" as you write. Treblinka was Germany extermination camp in occupied Poland. Why you lie???
Demjamjuk.. was I understand a Red Army POW .. of which some 3 million perished at the hands of their German guards.. Self preservation is a strong motivation force.. and if this poor man grasped a straw to try and save his live , by becoming a guard... then who amongst us.. could say for certain that they would not also do likewise. How many Guards are there round the Great gaza prison camp?
My question is the following: why doesnt Germany trial the German Nazis, some of which are still involved in politics. Why not chase the ones in Argentina?
That they were part of the German Holocaust industry once, long ago, does not make Germany their masyter today. International penal law: German territory, a German victim or German wrongdoer.
to send the PM into jail for settlements in occupied territories, for example. There are many war crimes and crimes against humanity around the globe.