• Published 00:42 19.06.11
  • Latest update 00:42 19.06.11

Defense Ministry: Altalena fallen were 'murdered'

The Altalena, carrying members of the right-wing Irgun militia, was sunk in 1948 after arriving in Tel Aviv against the Israeli government's orders.

By Amir Oren

The Defense Ministry said Friday the Irgun members who died in 1948 when the ship the Altalena was sunk by the Israel Defense Forces were "murdered."

The Altalena, carrying members of the right-wing Irgun militia, was sunk after arriving in Tel Aviv against the Israeli government's orders. Friday's announcement was put out ahead of a memorial ceremony for the dead, which will be held today with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on hand.

Altalena memorial (Nir Kafri)

A memorial to the Altalena in Tel Aviv.

Photo by: Nir Kafri

The ministry's statement did not specify who the murderers were. The order to shell the Altalena was given by David Ben-Gurion, both prime minister and defense minister at the time. The clash took place in June 1948 out of fear the fledgling state's authority could be undermined.

The Palmach force that shelled the ship was commanded by Yitzhak Rabin. Ben-Gurion opposed the existence of an independent paramilitary force that did not recognize the new government's authority.

Friday's announcement was published by the soldier memorial unit of the Defense Ministry's families and commemoration department. The ceremony, to be held today at the Nahalat Yitzhak military cemetery, is being organized by the organization of Irgun soldiers in Israel.

The clash in 1948 left 16 Irgun members and three IDF soldiers dead. Rabin wrote in his memoirs that Irgun reinforcements were streaming to the shore both from the ship and Tel Aviv. He said the Palmach headquarters was shot at, and the Palmach returned fire. He said one of the Irgun commanders shouted, "why are you shooting Jews?" "I told him, when Jews stop shooting us, we'll stop shooting Jews," Rabin wrote. He said he was at peace with Ben-Gurion's order.

Haaretz has asked the Defense Ministry whether Defense Minister Ehud Barak, currently in Paris, believes that the Altalena casualties were "murdered," with all that entails for Ben-Gurion, Rabin and the IDF. The head of information at the ministry, Shlomi Am-Shalom, said Barak gave an order to "investigate the severe mishap, ensure that it doesn't recur and publish a corrected announcement this morning, before the ceremony."

The head of the families and commemoration department at the ministry, Aryeh Mualem, was away from work because of a death in the family last week and did not see the draft of the announcement before it went to print. Following the incident, announcements by the ministry will now be monitored by the information department.

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
 
 
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 6. 0 0
    Rabin was the one shooting?
    • dan Raban
    • 19.06.11
    • 15:30

    I didn't know it was Rabin who was carrying the orders of Ben Gurion to murder fellow Jews. Was Yigal Amir following orders too ? I found it real strange that Rabin was at peace with his actions. Where do you draw the line? Did Amir followed what Rabin did decades ago? Shouldn't both actions be condemned?

  • 5. 0 0
    Ben-Gurion and Begin were both right
    • ERSB
    • 19.06.11
    • 15:09

    The Israeli right has incorrectly and unjustly turned the Altelena affair into a cause-celebre with which to bash first Ben-Gurion and later Rabin, for political reasons of course. We should remember that Ben-Gurion's political philosophy was centered on "mamlachtiut" (I don't know how to translate it, something like a philosophy of sovereignty). He understood that the voluntary organizations (largely party affiliated) that had organized everything from education, healthcare, culture and sports to defense in the pre-state Yishuv period had to be subordinated to state institutions once the State had been declared and nowhere was that as important as in military matters. Few remember this now, but the Palmach was widely seen as being associated with Mapam, a powerful rival of Ben-Gurion's Mapai party and Ben-Gurion disbanded the Palmach's autonomous command structure (much to the displeasure of the Palmach's fighters and political patrons) well before the Altelana affair. Getting back to Altelena, after the declaration of independence, Ben-Gurion recognized that in order to secure Israel's survival and sovereignty he needed to abolish all of the pre-state militias and integrate them into the fledgling IDF and Irgun units were already being integrated into the IDF at the time of the Altelana. The problem was that the Irgun wanted to be able to direct the course of the war outside the IDF's chain of command so when it obtained a shipment of weapons (the Altelena's cargo) it demanded the right to determine where the guns would go (i.e. to remaining Irgun units and IDF units containing a lot of former Irgun members) but Ben-Gurion refused to permit the Irgun to determine military priorities based on political considerations. A number of attempts were made by B-G to solve the dispute peacefully. The order to open fire on the Altelena was only give after the impasse had carried on for a number of days and it became known that Irgun fighters were abandoning their units in the field and heading towards Tel Aviv. B-G feared an Irgun sponsored coup if the Altelena affair wasn't brought to a prompt end and only then ordered the IDF to open fire. As to Begin, though he should have recognized that with independence, times had changed and he could no longer expect to command his own militia, he still deserves a lot of credit for calming the situation and preventing the out-break of a civil war.

  • 4. 0 0
    If Ben Gurion and Rabin
    • Andyboy
    • 19.06.11
    • 14:10

    and the others involved in the action to destroy the Altalena and all those on board did not participate in murder - what else would you call the action? Assassination for the benefit of the state? It was a monstrous decision then - and the stain is with us - and those who carried out the action - to this day!

  • 3. 0 0
    Is Assad murdering his citizens?
    • Ilan
    • 19.06.11
    • 12:50

    No, they are opposing his authority so the order to kill them is valid. Or at least that is the logic of those opposing referring to those killed by the authorities on the Atalena as murdered.

    • 0 0
      What?
      • Avi
      • 19.06.11
      • 15:29

      How is a clash between the army and an armed group guarding a stockpile of weapons in an event that happened like 70 years ago has anything to do with an Arab dictator butchering thousands of his own people?

  • 2. 0 0
  • 1. 0 0
    • 0 0
      Finish reading, please
      • Ralph
      • 19.06.11
      • 12:01

      "The head of information at the ministry, Shlomi Am-Shalom, said Barak gave an order to "investigate the severe mishap, ensure that it doesn't recur and publish a corrected announcement this morning, before the ceremony." "Following the incident, announcements by the ministry will now be monitored by the information department."

    • 0 0
      @Ralph
      • li
      • 19.06.11
      • 19:05

      The timing is not coincidence. It is a line Zionists want to draw for Jews by blaming "Jews" for an act against Zionists.